From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

88 A. FiserPetrey D, Xiang Z, Tang CL, et al. (2003) Using multiple structure alignments, fast model building,and energetic analysis in fold recognition and homology modeling. Proteins 53(Suppl6):430–435Pieper U, Eswar N, Davis FP, et al. (2006) MODBASE: a database of annotated comparative proteinstructure models and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D291–295Pillardy J, Czaplewski C, Liwo A, et al. (2001) Recent improvements in prediction of proteinstructure by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA98:2329–23233Qian B, Ortiz AR, Baker D (2004) Improvement of comparative model accuracy by free-energyoptimization along principal components of natural structural variation. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 101:15346–15351Rai BK, Fiser A (2006) Multiple mapping method: a novel approach to the sequence-to-structurealignment problem in comparative protein structure modeling. Proteins 63:644–661Rai BK, Madrid-Aliste CJ, Fajardo JE, et al. (2006) MMM: a sequence-to-structure alignmentprotocol. Bioinformatics 22:2691–2692Reddy BV, Li WW, Shindyalov IN, et al. (2001) Conserved key amino acid positions (CKAAPs)derived from the analysis of common substructures in proteins. Proteins 42:148–163Ring CS, Cohen FE (1993) Modeling protein structures: construction and their applications.FASEB J 7:783–890Ring CS, Sun E, McKerrow JH, et al. (1993) Structure-based inhibitor design by using proteinmodels for the development of antiparasitic agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3583–3587Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Chivian D, et al. (2004) Modeling structurally variable regions in homologousproteins with rosetta. Proteins 55:656–677.Rost B (1997) Protein structures sustain evolutionary drift. Fold Des 2:S19–S24Rost B (1999) Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng 12:85–94Rudolph MG, Stanfield RL, Wilson IA (2006) How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors.Annu Rev Immunol 24:419–466Rusch DB, Halpern AL, Sutton G, et al. (2007) The Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling expedition:northwest Atlantic through eastern tropical Pacific. PLoS Biol 5:e77Rychlewski L, Jaroszewski L, Li W, et al. (2000) Comparison of sequence profiles. Strategies forstructural predictions using sequence information. Protein Sci 9:232–241Rykunov D, Fiser A (2007) Effects of amino acid composition, finite size of proteins, and sparsestatistics on distance-dependent statistical pair potentials. Proteins 67:559–568Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints.J Mol Biol 234:779–815Sali A, Matsumoto R, McNeil HP, et al. (1993) Three-dimensional models of four mouse mast cellchymases. Identification of proteoglycan binding regions and protease-specific antigenicepitopes. J Biol Chem 268:9023–9034Sali A, Shakhnovich E, Karplus M (1994) How does a protein fold? Nature 369:248–251Samudrala R, Moult J (1998) A graph-theoretic algorithm for comparative modeling of proteinstructure. J Mol Biol 279:287–302Sanchez R, Sali A (1997) Evaluation of comparative protein structure modeling by MODELLER-3. Proteins(Suppl 1):50–58Sanchez R, Sali A (1998) Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiaegenome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13597–13602Sangar V, Blankenberg DJ, Altman N, et al. (2007) Quantitative sequence-function relationshipsin proteins based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 8:294Saraste M, Sibbald PR, Wittinghofer A (1990) The P-loop–a common motif in ATP- and GTPbindingproteins. Trends Biochem Sci 15:430–434Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL, Jr. (2000) Large-scale comparison of protein sequencealignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins 40:6–22Schaffer AA, Aravind L, Madden TL, et al. (2001) Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST proteindatabase searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res29:2994–3005