12.07.2015 Views

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8 3D Motifs 195Table 8.1 (continued)Name and URL Server function 3D motif database aProFuncwww.ebi.ac.uk/thorn<strong>to</strong>nsrv/databases/profuncProKnowProknow.mbi.ucla.eduProtemotprotemot.csbb.ntu.edu.twSuMosumo-pbil.ibcp.fr commercialsite: www.medit.fr/products-page2-medsumo.htmlMulti-search including motifsearch <strong>with</strong> JESS: wholequery vs. motif database,query fragments vs. wholechains; estimates significanceMulti-search including motifsearches <strong>with</strong> RIGOR,returns GO annotationsCompares query <strong>to</strong> all or asubset (enzymes only orspecific class) of ligandbindingmotifsCompares query structure,chain, or ligand-bindingsite <strong>to</strong> database of structuresor just their ligandbindingsites bActive site motifs from theCSA, 13,057 ligand-bindingand 1,200 DNA-bindingmotifs from individualstructures, 11,750 wholechains; residues are representedby side chain a<strong>to</strong>ms,smaller residues also byone or more backbonea<strong>to</strong>ms10,230 motifs <strong>with</strong> GOannotations from theirsource structures, 7,819 ifelectronic annotations areexcluded2,362 alpha-carbon bindingsite motifs, 1,051 fromenzymes34,210 ligand-binding sites inaddition <strong>to</strong> whole structuresdescribed as spatial patternsof functional groupsa<strong>From</strong> publication, web site, or communications <strong>with</strong> authors; may not be currentbNoncommercial use onlya derived 3D motif could still reflect common ancestry or coincidence rather thanshared function.Interpretation of matches <strong>to</strong> motifs generated by the “individual structures”method is rather subjective. Often, as in sequence-based inference, annotations aresimply transferred <strong>to</strong> the query from the source of the best-matching motif. Amatch <strong>to</strong> a binding site motif might be interpreted conservatively as a prediction ofbinding specificity, but other annotations like catalytic activity, family, and superfamilymight also be inferred (rightly or wrongly). It should be noted that mereproximity <strong>to</strong> a ligand does not guarantee that a residue is important for binding orcatalysis; substitutions may be well <strong>to</strong>lerated. Besides using residues near a ligand,another way <strong>to</strong> derive a motif from a single structure is <strong>to</strong> use annotations in thePDB file called SITE records. Although these annotations are intended <strong>to</strong> list residuesin binding sites, the meaning of matches <strong>to</strong> such motifs is also unclear, sincethere are no definitive criteria as <strong>to</strong> which residues should be listed. Furthermore,many PDB files of ligand-bound structures do not contain any SITE records.Another important consideration is match stringency, which depends on themotif size and representation and on the qualitative rules and numerical cu<strong>to</strong>ffs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!