From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7 Predicting Protein Function from Surface Properties 185Devos D, Valencia A (2000) Practical limits of function prediction. Proteins 41:98–107.Ebner S, Sharon N, Ben-Tal N (2003) Evolutionary analysis reveals collective propertiesand specificity in the C-type lectin and lectin-like domain superfamily. Proteins53:44–55.Elcock AH (2001) Prediction of functionally important residues based solely on the computedenergetics of protein structure. J Mol Biol 312:885–896.Fauchere JL, Pliska V (1983) Hydrophobic paramaters-pi of amino-acid side-chains from the partitioningof N-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur J Med Chem 18:369–375.Fogolari F, Brigo A, Molinari H (2002) The Poisson-Boltzmann equation for biomolecular electrostatics:a tool for structural biology. J Mol Recognit 15:377–392.Garvie CW, Phillips SE (2000) Direct and indirect readout in mutant Met repressor-operator complexes.Structure 8:905–914.Getzoff ED, Tainer JA, Weiner PK, et al. (1983) Electrostatic recognition between superoxide andcopper, zinc superoxide dismutase. Nature 306:287–290.Goodford PJ (1985) A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable bindingsites on biologically important macromolecules. J Med Chem 28:849–857.Hajduk PJ, Huth JR, Fesik SW (2005) Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMRbasedscreening data. J Med Chem 48:2518–2525.Hendlich M, Rippmann F, Barnickel G (1997) LIGSITE: automatic and efficient detection ofpotential small molecule-binding sites in proteins. J Mol Graph Model 15:359–363.Hopkins AL, Groom CR (2002) The druggable genome. Nat Rev Drug Discov 1:727–730.Jackson RM (2002) Q-fit: a probabilistic method for docking molecular fragments by samplinglow energy conformational space. J Comput Aided Mol Des 16:43–57.Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE (1993) Protein surface area defined. Nature 366:638.Janin J, Chothia C (1990) The structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J Biol Chem265:16027–16030.Janin J, Miller S, Chothia C (1988) Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins.J Mol Biol 204:155–164.Jones S, Thornton JM (1995) Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures.Prog Biophys Mol Biol 63:31–65.Jones S, Thornton JM (1996) Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA93:13–20.Jones S, Thornton JM (1997) Prediction of protein-protein interaction sites using patch analysis.J Mol Biol 272:133–143.Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2003) Identification of protein biochemical functions by similaritysearch using the molecular surface database eF-site. Protein Sci 12:1589–1595.Ko J, Murga LF, André P, et al. (2005) Statistical criteria for the identification of protein activesites using Theoretical Microscopic Titration Curves. Proteins 59:183–95.Laskowski RA (1995) SURFNET: a program for visualizing molecular surfaces, cavities, andintermolecular interactions. J Mol Graph 13:323–330.Laskowski RA, Luscombe NM, Swindells MB, et al. (1996) Protein clefts in molecular recognitionand function. Protein Sci 5:2438–2452.Laskowski RA, Chistyakov VV, Thornton JM (2005) PDBsum more: new summaries and analysesof the known 3D structures of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D266–268.Laurie AT, Jackson RM (2005) Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligandbinding sites. Bioinformatics 21:1908–1916.Laurie AT, Jackson RM (2006) Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites forstructure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:395–406.Lee B, Richards FM (1971) The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility.J Mol Biol 55:379–400.Levitt DG, Banaszak LJ (1992) POCKET: a computer graphics method for identifying and displayingprotein cavities and their surrounding amino acids. J Mol Graph 10:229–234.Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE (1996) Evolutionarily conserved Galphabetagamma bindingsurfaces support a model of the G protein-receptor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA93:7507–7511.
186 N.J. Burgoyne and R.M. JacksonLijnzaad P, Berendsen HJ, Argos P (1996) Hydrophobic patches on the surfaces of protein structures.Proteins 25:389–397.Lo Conte L, Chothia C, Janin J (1999) The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites.J Mol Biol 285:2177–2198.Ma B, Elkayam T, Wolfson H, et al. (2003) Protein-protein interactions: structurally conservedresidues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 100:5772–5777.Murakami Y, Jones S (2006) SHARP2: protein-protein interaction predictions using patch analysis.Bioinformatics 22:1794–1795.Murga LF, Ondrechen MJ, Ringe D (2008) Prediction of interaction sites from apo 3D structureswhen the holo conformation is different. Proteins 72:980–992.Neuvirth H, Raz R, Schreiber G (2004) ProMate: a structure based prediction program to identifythe location of protein-protein binding sites. J Mol Biol 338:181–199.Newman M, Lunnen K, Wilson G, et al. (1998) Crystal structure of restriction endonuclease BglIbound to its interrupted DNA recognition sequence. EMBO J 17:5466–5476.Nissink JWM, Verdonk ML, Klebe G (2000) Simple knowledge-based descriptors to predict protein-ligandinteractions. methodology and validation. J Comput Aided Mol Des 14:787–803.O’Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer EL (2005) Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryoticorthologs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D476–480.Oledzki PR, Laurie AT, Jackson RM (2006) Protein–ligand docking and structure-based drugdesign. Edited by Westhead DR, Dunn MJ In, Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics,Proteomics and Bioinformatics, 1–17.Ondrechen MJ, Clifton JG, Ringe D (2001) THEMATICS: a simple computational predictor ofenzyme function from structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12473–12478.Pettit FK, Bare E, Tsai A, et al. (2007) HotPatch: a statistical approach to finding biologically relevantfeatures on protein surfaces. J Mol Biol 369:863–879.Pupko T, Bell RE, Mayrose I, et al. (2002) Rate4Site: an algorithmic tool for the identification offunctional regions in proteins by surface mapping of evolutionary determinants within theirhomologues. Bioinformatics 18(Suppl 1):S71–77.Radzicka A, Pedersen L, Wolfenden R (1988) Influences of solvent water on protein folding: free energiesof solvation of cis and trans peptides are nearly identical. Biochemistry 27:4538–4541.Rocchia W, Sridharan S, Nicholls A, et al. (2002) Rapid grid-based construction of the molecularsurface and the use of induced surface charge to calculate reaction field energies: applicationsto the molecular systems and geometric objects. J Comput Chem 23:128–137.Stawiski EW, Gregoret LM, Mandel-Gutfreund Y (2003) Annotating nucleic acid-binding functionbased on protein structure. J Mol Biol 326:1065–1079.Thorn KS, Bogan AA (2001) ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the freeenergy of binding in protein interactions. Bioinformatics 17:284–285.Todd AE, Orengo CA, Thornton JM (2002) Sequence and structural differences between enzymeand nonenzyme homologs. Structure 10:1435–1451.Tong W, Williams RJ, Wei Y, et al. (2008) Enhanced performance in prediction of protein activesites with THEMATICS and support vector machines. Protein Sci 17:333–341.Tsuchiya Y, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H (2005) PreDs: a server for predicting dsDNA-binding siteon protein molecular surfaces. Bioinformatics 21:1721–1723.Valdar WS (2002) Scoring residue conservation. Proteins 48:227–241.Wang Y, Zhang H, Li W, et al. (1995) Discriminating compact nonnative structures from the nativestructure of globular proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:709–713.Wolfenden R, Andersson L, Cullis PM, et al. (1981) Affinities of amino acid side chains for solventwater. Biochemistry 20:849–855.Xu D, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R (1997) Hydrogen bonds and salt bridges across protein-protein interfaces.Protein Eng 10:999–1012.Yadav A, Jackson RM, Holbrook JJ, et al. (1991) Role of solvent reorganization energies in thecatalytic activity of enzymes. J Am Chem Soc. 113:4800–4805.Zhou H-X, Qin S (2007) Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment.Bioinformatics 23:2203–2209.
Page 3:
Daniel John RigdenEditorFrom Protei
Page 8 and 9:
ContentsSection I Generating and In
Page 10 and 11:
Contentsxi4.2.1 Alpha-Helical Bundl
Page 12 and 13:
Contentsxiii7.4.2 Predicting Bindin
Page 14 and 15:
Contentsxv12.3 Accuracy and Added V
Page 16 and 17:
4 J. Lee et al.about 5.3 million pr
Page 18 and 19:
6 J. Lee et al.Table 1.1 A list of
Page 20 and 21:
8 J. Lee et al.2000; Sorin and Pand
Page 22 and 23:
10 J. Lee et al.Although most knowl
Page 24 and 25:
12 J. Lee et al.Fig. 1.3 Two exampl
Page 26 and 27:
14 J. Lee et al.rugged containing m
Page 28 and 29:
16 J. Lee et al.1.3.4 Mathematical
Page 30 and 31:
18 J. Lee et al.potentials, each re
Page 32 and 33:
20 J. Lee et al.viewpoint of struct
Page 34 and 35:
22 J. Lee et al.Hsieh MJ, Luo R (20
Page 36 and 37:
24 J. Lee et al.Sippl MJ (1990) Cal
Page 38 and 39:
Chapter 2Fold RecognitionLawrence A
Page 40 and 41:
2 Fold Recognition 29It has long be
Page 42 and 43:
2 Fold Recognition 31Fig. 2.2 Graph
Page 44 and 45:
2 Fold Recognition 33distribute the
Page 46 and 47:
2 Fold Recognition 35Table 2.1 (a)
Page 48 and 49:
2 Fold Recognition 37dependent on t
Page 50 and 51:
2 Fold Recognition 39based on the r
Page 52 and 53:
2 Fold Recognition 41The idea of co
Page 54 and 55:
2 Fold Recognition 43query sequence
Page 56 and 57:
2 Fold Recognition 452.3.4 Consensu
Page 58 and 59:
2 Fold Recognition 472.4 Alignment
Page 60 and 61:
2 Fold Recognition 49statistical me
Page 62 and 63:
2 Fold Recognition 51methods (e.g.
Page 64 and 65:
2 Fold Recognition 53Berman HM, Wes
Page 66 and 67:
2 Fold Recognition 55Tress ML, Jone
Page 68 and 69:
58 A. Fiserwith more than 50% seque
Page 70 and 71:
60 A. FiserIn contrast to ab initio
Page 72 and 73:
62 A. FiserTable 3.1 (continued)SWI
Page 74 and 75:
64 A. Fiserbetween fold recognition
Page 76 and 77:
66 A. FiserFig. 3.1 Comparing accur
Page 78 and 79:
68 A. Fiserinto conserved core regi
Page 80 and 81:
70 A. Fiseralignments are built and
Page 82 and 83:
72 A. Fiserfold, such as the hyperv
Page 84 and 85:
74 A. Fiserfunctions delivers impro
Page 86 and 87:
76 A. Fiserfrom efforts of genome s
Page 88 and 89:
78 A. FiserA rigorous statistical e
Page 90 and 91:
80 A. Fiser(Clore et al. 1993). Cha
Page 92 and 93:
82 A. FiserImproved and new methods
Page 94 and 95:
84 A. FiserClaessens M, Van Cutsem
Page 96 and 97:
86 A. FiserHavel TF, Snow ME (1991)
Page 98 and 99:
88 A. FiserPetrey D, Xiang Z, Tang
Page 100 and 101:
90 A. Fiservan Vlijmen HW, Karplus
Page 102 and 103:
92 T. Nugent and D.T. Jones4.2 Stru
Page 104 and 105:
94 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesFig. 4.2
Page 106 and 107:
96 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesTable 4.
Page 108 and 109:
98 T. Nugent and D.T. Jones2000), d
Page 110 and 111:
100 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesTable 4
Page 112 and 113:
102 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesFig. 4.
Page 114 and 115:
104 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesFig. 4.
Page 116 and 117:
106 T. Nugent and D.T. Jonessubdivi
Page 118 and 119:
108 T. Nugent and D.T. Jonescomplex
Page 120 and 121:
110 T. Nugent and D.T. JonesMartell
Page 122 and 123:
Chapter 5Bioinformatics Approaches
Page 124 and 125:
5 Structure and Function of Intrins
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143: 5 Structure and Function of Intrins
Page 150 and 151: Chapter 6Function Diversity Within
Page 152 and 153: 6 Function Diversity Within Folds a
Page 174 and 175: Chapter 7Predicting Protein Functio
Page 176 and 177: 7 Predicting Protein Function from
Page 190 and 191: Table 7.1 Online resources and tool
Page 194 and 195: Chapter 83D MotifsElaine C. Meng, B
Page 196 and 197: 8 3D Motifs 189clustering similar s
Page 198 and 199: 8 3D Motifs 191To improve the signa
Page 200 and 201: 8 3D Motifs 193structures together.
Page 202 and 203: 8 3D Motifs 195Table 8.1 (continued
Page 204 and 205: 8 3D Motifs 1978.3.1 User-Defined M
Page 206 and 207: 8 3D Motifs 199Fig. 8.3 The FFF mot
Page 208 and 209: 8 3D Motifs 2018.3.2 Motif Discover
Page 210 and 211: 8 3D Motifs 203In addition to SITE
Page 212 and 213: 8 3D Motifs 205folds; they shared a
Page 214 and 215: 8 3D Motifs 207from a training set
Page 216 and 217: 8 3D Motifs 209Table 8.3 Web server
Page 218 and 219: 8 3D Motifs 211its greater overall
Page 220 and 221: 8 3D Motifs 213Ideally, a 3D motif
Page 222 and 223: 8 3D Motifs 215Ivanisenko VA, Pintu
Page 224 and 225: Chapter 9Protein Dynamics: From Str
Page 226 and 227: 9 Protein Dynamics: From Structure
Page 242 and 243:
9 Protein Dynamics: From Structure
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
252 R.A. LaskowskiConsequently, man
Page 260 and 261:
254 R.A. Laskowskiucla.edu, and Pro
Page 262 and 263:
256 R.A. LaskowskiFig. 10.2 Gene On
Page 264 and 265:
258 R.A. Laskowski10.2.5 Protein In
Page 266 and 267:
260 R.A. LaskowskiFig. 10.4 Schemat
Page 268 and 269:
262 R.A. Laskowskiaccessibility and
Page 270 and 271:
264 R.A. LaskowskiFig. 10.6 A ligan
Page 272 and 273:
266 R.A. LaskowskiGly97Gly99Tyr98Ty
Page 274 and 275:
268 R.A. LaskowskiFig. 10.8 Example
Page 276 and 277:
270 R.A. LaskowskiReferencesAltschu
Page 278 and 279:
272 R.A. LaskowskiXenarios I, Salwi
Page 280 and 281:
274 J.D. Watson and J.M. ThorntonTh
Page 282 and 283:
276 J.D. Watson and J.M. ThorntonTa
Page 284 and 285:
278 J.D. Watson and J.M. Thorntonva
Page 286 and 287:
280 J.D. Watson and J.M. Thorntonfo
Page 288 and 289:
282 J.D. Watson and J.M. Thorntonin
Page 290 and 291:
284 J.D. Watson and J.M. Thorntonan
Page 292 and 293:
286 J.D. Watson and J.M. ThorntonFi
Page 294 and 295:
288 J.D. Watson and J.M. ThorntonPD
Page 296 and 297:
290 J.D. Watson and J.M. ThorntonKi
Page 298 and 299:
Chapter 12Prediction of Protein Fun
Page 300 and 301:
12 Prediction of Protein Function f
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
320 IndexConsensus templates, 205Co
Page 326 and 327:
322 IndexLigand-binding templates,
Page 328:
324 IndexStructure-function linkage
show all

From Protein Structure to Function with Bioinformatics.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?