2012 New Releases Catalogue December - Learningemall.com

the FCA?What are the common defenses inFCA cases?How are qui tam cases filed by privatecounsel and how are they handled byDOJ?Who qualifies as a proper qui tamplaintiff?What are the Fraud Enforcement andRecovery Act of 2009 amendments tothe FCA and the Patient Protectionand Affordable Care Act of 2010?Item no. : ZU11200575Format : CD-ROM (Win)Duration : 90 minutesCopyright : 2011Price : USD 150.00RUSSIA, CHINA AND INDIA:DESIGNING COMPLIANCEPROGRAMS FORDEVELOPING ANTITRUSTENFORCEMENT REGIMESBy Maria Ankoudinova, Susan Ning,Pallavi Shroff, D. Daniel Sokol, Mark D.WhitenerGiven the size of the economies and therelative youth of their antitrust agencies,compliance with competition law in Russia,China and India presents significantpotential issues for any in-house lawyer.The purpose of this program is to providecorporate counsel with an overview of howto manage compliance with these legalsystems. The panel addresses not just theapplication of the laws, but also discussesthe political and economic factors that mayinfluence enforcement priorities in thesecountries.Item no. : LN11200585Format : CD-ROM (Win)Duration : 90 minutesCopyright : 2011Price : USD 150.00TO SHARE OR NOT TOSHARE? WHERE TO DRAWTHE LINE INBENCHMARKING ANDOTHER INFORMATIONEXCHANGES AMONGCOMPETITORSBy Diane Bieri, Vianney Boiteau, David L.Meyer, J. Thomas Rosch, Carter B.SimpsonInformation on markets and the activitiesof competitors is the essential lifeblood ofmost corporate decision making. Oftenthough, the only source of this informationis the competitors themselves. Whether itis a benchmarking exercise, a tradeassociation, or outside consultant that hasbeen hired to compile information on salesgrowth or market shares based onproduction figures, these informationexchanges expose the participants toantitrust risk. When might an agreementbe inferred? Might the FTC view anexchange as a "facilitating practice" thatcan be reached by Section 5? Could theeffect of the information exchange onthe participants' market behavior bedeemed a violation even if there is noactual agreement on price or output?This program explores these and otherissues under both U.S. law and thearguably more stringent EU standards,and provide a discussion of "bestpractices" and other practical advice forin-house counsel on how to manage therisks in this area.Item no. : DT11200605Format : CD-ROM (Win)Duration : 85 minutesCopyright : 2011Price : USD 150.00APPELLATEADVOCACY2011-2012 2012 NATIONALAPPELLATE ADVOCACYCOMPETITION NATIONALFINALSThe 2011-12 Law Student DivisionNational Appellate Advocacy CompetitionNational FinalsTopic: Insurance Coverage for AutismThis year's problem involves access tohealth care. It is a civil case involving ayoung boy with autism and his efforts toget coverage for the therapy that hisdoctor prescribed. The case raises twofederal questions, one under the "EarlyPeriodic Screening, Diagnosis andTreatment" provisions of the Medicaid Act,and the other under the Paul Wellstoneand Pete Domenici Mental Health Parityand Addiction Equity Act of 2008. Bothissues raise realistic, cutting-edgequestions for which there is no clearanswer in current law.The Law Student Division created theNAAC to emphasize the development oforal advocacy skills through a realisticappellate advocacy experience.Competitors participate in a hypotheticalappeal to the United States SupremeCourt. The competition involves writing a40-page brief as either respondent orpetitioner and then arguing the case infront of the mock court.The 34th National Appellate AdvocacyCompetition National Finals took placeApril 12-14, 2012 at the U.S. District Courtfor the Northern District of Illinois with theChampionship round taking place at thecourtroom of the Illinois Supreme CourtChicago Courtroom. Two hundred andeight teams from 120 ABA-approved lawschools entered this year's competition.The top two teams out of the 26 thatadvanced to the National Finals square offteams from Washington University Schoolof Law and Pepperdine University Schoolof Law demonstrating their skills in oraladvocacy while competing for the 2011-12National Appellate Advocacy CompetitionNational Championship.This video captures the NationalChampionship final round in its entirety -including the judges' critique. It alsoincludes the portable document files of thecompetition problem (the record) and thebench memo allowing viewers to gaingreater insight into the competitors'presentation, as well as the judges'critiques. Use the video, competitionproblem, and bench memo to help youprepare for the NAAC or as a tutorial ineffective appellate advocacy techniques.Item no. : LN11200243Format : DVD-ROMDuration : Approx. 90 minutesCopyright : 2012Price : USD 170.00LITIGATION BEFORE THETRADEMARK TRIAL ANDAPPEAL BOARD:STRATEGIC ANDEFFECTIVE BESTPRACTICESBy Cheryl Butler, Jonathan Hudis, Mary L.Kevlin, Angela LykosThis 90 minute audio CD-ROM covers theintricacies of practicing before theTrademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB).Topics discussed include strategic andeffective deployment of inter partes matters and prefilingconsiderations; pleadings and commencement ofproceedings; disclosures and discovery; motion practice; trial procedures and rules ofevidence; the use of experts; and briefs on final hearing and oralargument.The panel includes expert practitionersbefore the USPTO Board as well as aUSPTO Board member and interlocutoryattorney.Item no. : DC11200309Format : CD-ROM (Win)Duration : 90 minutesCopyright : 2012Price : USD 150.00TAKING THE RAND CASETO TRIALBy Eric Benisek, Richard VasquezHow do you try a RAND case? Much inkhas been spilled on the academicdiscussion of standards settingorganizations (SSOs), patent hold- up,in this informative video, which shows________________________________________________________________________________________________________Learning Rendezvous LimitedEmail: inquiry@learningemall.com Websites: http://www.learningemall.com & http://www.learningemall.com.hk9