<strong>CUVX</strong> <strong>Design</strong> – VT Team 2 Page 14optimized for this particular use. The structural characteristics are well known. Conventional monohulls have alarge residuary resistance at high speeds. The radar cross-section for a ship with bow flare and vertical or flaredsides may be significant. Compared to multi-hulls <strong>the</strong>re is less usable deck area.• Wave Piercing Tumble<strong>home</strong> MonohullThe Wave Piercing Tumble<strong>home</strong> Hull form (WPTH) has negative flare for all sections of <strong>the</strong> hull above <strong>the</strong>waterline. It is designed to penetrate waves, reducing <strong>the</strong> potential for slamming and extreme bow and sternaccelerations, and decreasing resistance in waves. The tumble<strong>home</strong> hull form offers an inward-sloping ruledfreeboard to potential threats, minimizing RCS. Since <strong>the</strong> WPTH hullform is a monohull, <strong>the</strong> construction costwould be lower than multi-hulls of <strong>the</strong> same displacement. There is more large-object space than in multi-hulls of<strong>the</strong> same displacement.The negative flare reduces arrangeable volume and area high in <strong>the</strong> ship. Deck area is a particular concern forflight operations where <strong>the</strong> recovery and launch decks must be of sufficient size. Flare also provides an increasingrighting moment with heel; tumble<strong>home</strong> exhibits <strong>the</strong> opposite, limiting <strong>the</strong> acceptable operational envelope toprevent capsize. Damage stability also suffers. The risk associated with this hull form is significant, since no largenaval WPTH has been built.Table 7. Hullform Advantages (+) / Disadvantages (-)LowRCSEndurance @Low SpeedLowCostResistanceat SustainedSpeedGood Large-ObjectSpacesRecoveryDeckGoodSeakeepingCatamaran - - ++ - ++ ++SWATH - - -- - - ++ +++SurvivabilityTrimaran - - ++ - ++ ++ +ConventionalMonohull+ ++ ++ + -WPTH +++ + + + + - + ?Modified-RepeatLPD-17+ + +++ ++ + +Table 7 summarizes <strong>the</strong> preliminary assessment of hull forms for <strong>CUVX</strong>. Based on this preliminaryassessment of hull forms, <strong>the</strong> conventional monohull, WPTH and LPD-17 mod-repeat hull forms were selected forfur<strong>the</strong>r investigation and trade-off in Concept Exploration and optimization.3.2.2 Sustainability AlternativesSustainability characteristics for <strong>CUVX</strong> include endurance range, endurance stores duration, aircraft weaponsstorage, and aircraft fuel storage. A threshold value of 4000 nm is a typical minimum for surface-combatantendurance range. Auxiliary and amphibious ships typically have values closer to 12000 nm. These values are usedas <strong>the</strong> threshold and goal values, respectively. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>CUVX</strong> trade-off study, <strong>the</strong> values of 4000 nm, 8000 nm, and12000 nm are considered.Endurance stores duration is typically 60-120 days for naval ships. Values of 60, 90 and 120 days areconsidered for <strong>CUVX</strong>. CV 67 data is used to specify goals and thresholds for <strong>CUVX</strong> space required for aircraftammo and fuel. CV 67 is non-nuclear and more similar to <strong>CUVX</strong> than CVNs. CV 67 carries 49 aircraft, 609.6MT of ammo, and 3353 MT of fuel. CV 67 aircraft ammo and fuel weights per aircraft are: 12.4 MT for ammo and68.4 MT for fuel. The <strong>CUVX</strong> threshold value for ammo storage was determined to be 5 MT/UCAV and <strong>the</strong> goalvalue 15 MT/UCAV. The threshold value for fuel was determined to be 30 MT/UCAV and <strong>the</strong> goal value 60MT/UCAV.3.2.3 Propulsion and Electrical Machinery Alternatives3.2.3.1 Machinery RequirementsBased on <strong>the</strong> ADM and Program Manager guidance, pertinent propulsion plant design requirements aresummarized as follows:General Requirements - The propulsion engines must be non-nuclear, grade A shock certified, and Navy qualified.The machinery system alternatives must span a total power range of 40000–80000 SHP with total ship service++++
<strong>CUVX</strong> <strong>Design</strong> – VT Team 2 Page 15power greater than 8000 kW MFLM. The IPS options must provide 30000-60000 kW pulse power for aircraftlaunch. The propulsion engines should have a low IR signature, and cruise/boost options should be considered forhigh endurance.LPD-17 Machinery Plant – Based on <strong>the</strong> ADM requirement to consider an LPD-17 modified-repeat as one of <strong>the</strong>design options, <strong>the</strong> LPD-17 machinery plant shall be one of <strong>the</strong> <strong>CUVX</strong> machinery plant alternatives.Sustained Speed and Propulsion Power - The ship shall be capable of a minimum sustained speed of 20 knots in<strong>the</strong> full load condition, calm water, and clean hull using no more than 80% of <strong>the</strong> installed engine rating (maximumcontinuous rating, MCR) of <strong>the</strong> main propulsion engine(s) or motor(s), as applicable for mechanical drive plants orelectric propulsion plants. For integrated electric propulsion plants, <strong>the</strong> power required to achieve this speed mustnot be greater than 80% of <strong>the</strong> installed generator set rating following deductions for at-sea ship service powerrequirements and electric plant growth margins. To satisfy this requirement, and assuming a full load displacementof 20000 to 30000 MT, machinery plant options with total propulsion brake horsepower in <strong>the</strong> range of40000 to 80000 SHP shall be considered.Range and Endurance- The ship shall have sufficient burnable fuel in <strong>the</strong> full load condition for a minimum rangeof 4000 nautical miles at 20 knots. Endurance options up to 12000 nautical miles shall be considered. The totalfuel rate for <strong>the</strong> propulsion engines, generator sets, and auxiliary boilers to be used in determining <strong>the</strong> endurancefuel requirements shall be calculated using methods described in DDS 200-1. Fuel efficient propulsion optionssuch as diesel engines and ICR gas turbines shall be considered.Ship Control and Machinery Plant Automation – In order to reduce manning from prohibitive CVN levels, anintegrated bridge system shall be provided in <strong>the</strong> Navigating Bridge to incorporate integrated navigation, radiocommunications, interior communications, and ship maneuvering equipment and systems and shall comply withABS Guide for One Man Bridge Operated (OMBO) Ships. Propulsion control shall be possible from <strong>the</strong> shipcontrol console (SCC) on <strong>the</strong> Navigating Bridge and <strong>the</strong> main control console (MCC) at <strong>the</strong> Enclosed OperatingStation (EOS). In addition to compliance with ABS ACCU requirements for periodically unattended machineryspaces, <strong>the</strong> machinery centralized control system shall be designed to continuously monitor auxiliary systems,electric plant and damage control systems from <strong>the</strong> SCC, MCC and Chief Engineer’s office, and control <strong>the</strong>systems from <strong>the</strong> MCC and local controllers.Propulsion Engine and Ship Service Generator Certification – Because of <strong>the</strong> criticality of propulsion and shipservice power to many aspects of <strong>the</strong> ship’s mission and survivability, this equipment shall be Navy-qualifiedand Grade-A shock certified.Temperature and Humidity – <strong>Design</strong> environmental conditions shall be based on <strong>the</strong> requirement for extendedvessel operations in <strong>the</strong> Persian Gulf. For internal combustion engines which draw combustion air from <strong>the</strong>wea<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> propulsion engine ratings shall be based on <strong>the</strong> ship operating temperatures listed in Table 8.Table 8. Ship Operating TemperaturesCondition Summer WinterOutside Dry Bulb 40 degrees C -18 degrees COutside Wet Bulb30 degrees CSeawater 35 degrees C -2 degrees CFor IC engines that draw combustion air from <strong>the</strong> surrounding machinery space, engines shall be rated at <strong>the</strong> airtemperature of <strong>the</strong> machinery space and sea water temperature based on <strong>the</strong> summer conditions in Table 8.Fuel - The machinery plant shall be designed for continuous operation using distillate fuel in accordance withASTM D975, Grade 2-D; ISO 8217, F-DMA, DFM (NATO Code F-76 and JP-5 (NATO Code F-44).Steam - Steam shall not be used as a means of providing power for main propulsion. Auxiliary steam may beconsidered for catapult launch in mechanical drive alternatives.3.2.3.2 Machinery Plant AlternativesFourteen machinery plant alternatives are considered in <strong>the</strong> <strong>CUVX</strong> trade-off study. These alternatives areshown in Figure 4. Alternatives 1-5 are mechanical drive systems and Alternatives 6-14 are electric drive systems(IPS). Alternatives 1-3 are single shaft configurations that require two gas turbine engines with greater than 20000BHP each with single reduction gears. The fourth alternative is <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> configuration used in <strong>the</strong> LPD-17,and <strong>the</strong> fifth alternative is a two shaft CODAG configuration, combining <strong>the</strong> efficiency of a diesel and <strong>the</strong> power ofa gas turbine. Alternatives 6-9 are single shaft IPS configurations that have <strong>the</strong> same propulsion engines asAlternatives 1-3, but Alternatives 6, 7 and 9 only require two generators instead of three because <strong>the</strong>y use <strong>the</strong>