CUVX Design Report - the AOE home page - Virginia Tech

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CUVX Design – VT Team 2 Page 18PropulsionOptionsDescriptionPropulsionSystem TypePSYS TYPPropellerShafts, N propTotalPropulsionEngine BHPP BPENGTOT (hp)SSG Power(ea)KW G (kW)Number ofSSGsN SSGEndurancePropulsionSFC ePE(kg/kwhr)EnduranceSSG SFC eG(kg/kwhr)MachineryBoxMinimumLengthL MBreq (m)MachineryBoxMinimumWidthw MBreq (m)MachineryBoxMinimumHeightH MBreq (m)Basic ElectricMachineryWeightW BMG (MT)BasicPropulsionMachineryWeightW BM (MT)Table 13. Propulsion Alternative Data1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 142xLM25003x3000kwSSGTG2xICR3x3000kwSSGTGCOGAG1xICR1xLM25003x3000kwSSGTG(LPD-17)4xPC2.5V165x2500kwSSDGCODAG2xLM25002xPC2.5V165x2500kwSSDG2xLM25002x3000kwSSGTG2xICR2x3000kwSSGTG5xPC2.5V162x2500kwSSDG1xICR1xLM25002x3000kwSSGTG3xLM25002x3000kwSSGTG3xICR2x3000kwSSGTG5xPC2.5V162x2500kwSSDG2xLM25001xICR2x3000kw SSGTGMech. Mech. Mech. Mech. Mech. IPS IPS IPS IPS IPS IPS IPS IPS IPS1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 22xLM25002xPC2.5V162x2500kwSSDG52500 58100 55300 41600 73300 52500 58100 52000 55300 78800 87100 52000 81500 733003000 3000 3000 2500 2500 3000 3000 2500 3000 3000 3000 2500 3000 25003 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 20.264 0.199 0.202 0.210 0.266 0.261 0.198 0.213 0.198 0.264 0.198 0.211 0.264 0.2100.300 0.298 0.299 0.187 0.186 0.301 0.299 0.192 0.300 0.298 0.296 0.193 0.297 0.19315.86 15.87 16.13 15.96 16.39 16.16 16.36 13.91 16.36 16.16 16.36 13.91 16.36 16.166.63 6.63 6.63 16.07 16.07 6.83 6.83 17.94 6.83 6.83 6.83 17.94 6.83 17.946.14 6.22 6.22 6.67 6.67 6.62 6.63 7.59 6.63 6.62 6.63 7.59 6.63 7.59198.9 198.9 198.9 304.8 304.8 132.9 132.9 122.6 132.9 132.9 132.9 122.6 132.9 122.6655.2 745.8 767.2 902.9 1187.6 651.1 740.8 1934.5 705.2 935.5 1069.9 2051.0 981.1 1746.1PropulsionUptake AreaA PIE (m 2 )SSG UptakeAreaA GIE (m 2 )MachineryBox RequiredVolumeV MBreq (m 3 )28.0 27.2 27.7 11.6 33.8 28.0 27.2 14.5 27.7 42.0 41.55 14.5 41.9 33.810.8 10.8 10.8 1.0 1.0 7.2 7.2 0.4 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.4 7.2 0.45888 6536 6285 7816 7852 5138 5261 9487 5217 6982 7189 11127 7069 8514Ship Service Generator Options – Two alternatives are selected for ship service generator sets, one diesel andone gas turbine. The diesel generator alternative uses the CAT 3608 IL8 engine. This is a Navy standard, shockqualified generator set that is used in AOE-6 and LPD-17. This generator set has excellent fuel consumption. Thegas turbine generator option is the DDA 501-K34. This is the newer version of the DDA 501-K17 with a higherpower output. This generator is Grade A shock qualified and US Navy certified. It has a high power density. TheCAT 3608 engine is heavier and larger than the DDA 501-K34, but is more fuel efficient. Characteristics for thegenerator sets engines are listed in Table 14 and Table 15.
CUVX Design – VT Team 2 Page 19Table 14. CAT 3608 Specifications and DimensionsTable 15. DDA 501-K34 Gas Turbine Specifications and Dimensions3.2.4 Automation and Manning ParametersTo minimize CUVX acquisition cost, life cycle cost and personnel vulnerability during combat, it is veryimportant to reduce manning. A number of automation technologies for aircraft launch and recovery, handling,maintenance, and weapons handling were considered for CUVX including an electromagnetic aircraft launchingsystem (EMALS), advanced arresting gear (AAG) or electromagnetic aircraft recovery system (EARS), pit stopconcepts for fueling and arming aircraft, a shipboard weapons loader (SWL), and the use of fuel and weaponsaircraft modules.In concept exploration it is difficult to deal with automation manning reductions explicitly, so ship andaviation manning factors are used. These factors represent reductions from “standard” manning levels that resultfrom automation. This leads to the regression based manning equations shown in Figure 5. The manning factorsCManShip and CManAir, which vary from 0.5 to 1.0, are used as CUVX design parameters DP14 and DP19. Aship manning factor, CManShip, of 1.0 corresponds to CV-like manning. A ship manning factor of 0.5 correlatesto a 50% reduction in manning compared to a CV. These manning factors are also applied using simpleexpressions based on expert opinion for ship accommodations and support, automation cost, automation risk,damage control performance and repair capability performance. The standard manning calculations are shown inFigure 5. The values of performance for repairs and damage control are shown in Figure 6. The calculation forautomation impact on cost and risk is shown in Figure 7. A more detailed manning analysis is performed inconcept development.The simple regression-based equations are based on the following independent variables:W P : total payload weight W VP : variable payload weightW F23 : total weight of aircraft V FL : full load hull displacement volumeN SSG : number of ship service generators V D : deckhouse volumeN prop : number of propellersThe simple regression-based equations calculate the following:N EShip : number of ship enlisted men (including CPO-Chief Petty Officers)N EAir : number of air enlisted men (including CPO-Chief Petty Officers)N OShip : number of ship officersN OAir : number of air officersN E : total number of enlisted men N O : total number of officers
Page 1: CUVX Design ReportUnmanned Combat A
Page 5 and 6: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 54.12
Page 7 and 8: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 7feasi
Page 9 and 10: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 92 Mis
Page 11 and 12: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 11ROC
Page 13 and 14: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 13cata
Page 15 and 16: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 15powe
Page 17: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 17much
Page 21 and 22: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 21requ
Page 23 and 24: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 23a hi
Page 25 and 26: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 25AAG
Page 27 and 28: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 273.2.
Page 29 and 30: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 29Tabl
Page 31 and 32: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 31Figu
Page 33 and 34: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 33chec
Page 35 and 36: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 35Requ
Page 37 and 38: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 37(gen
Page 39 and 40: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 39ROCA
Page 43 and 44: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 43one
Page 49 and 50: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 494 Co
Page 51 and 52: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 51Hang
Page 55 and 56: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 55The
Page 65 and 66: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 65Endu
Page 67 and 68: CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 67Fuel
Page 69 and 70:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 69Figu
Page 71 and 72:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 71spee
Page 73 and 74:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 73were
Page 75 and 76:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 75Medi
Page 77 and 78:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 77acce
Page 79 and 80:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 79bolt
Page 81 and 82:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 81Tabl
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 854.12
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 91Modu
Page 93 and 94:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 935 Co
Page 95 and 96:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 95Refe
Page 97 and 98:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 97b. M
Page 99 and 100:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 99Appe
Page 101 and 102:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 101exc
Page 103 and 104:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 1038.
Page 105 and 106:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 105NSF
Page 107 and 108:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 107row
Page 109 and 110:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 109V D
Page 111 and 112:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 1111.0
Page 113 and 114:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 113The
Page 115 and 116:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 115i17
Page 117 and 118:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 117+ P
Page 119 and 120:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 11912.
Page 121 and 122:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 121D.3
Page 123 and 124:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 123Equ
Page 125 and 126:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 125D.4
Page 127 and 128:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 127LAU
Page 129 and 130:
CUVX Design - VT Team 2 Page 129too
show all

CUVX Design Report - the AOE home page - Virginia Tech

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?