Master Thesis - Fachbereich Informatik
Master Thesis - Fachbereich Informatik
Master Thesis - Fachbereich Informatik
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
126 CHAPTER 5. RESULTS AND EVALUATION<br />
Larger tubes can be covered by the 16mm focal length lens like 50mm tubes, but the<br />
camera has to be placed further away from the conveyor to yield a larger field of view. The<br />
resulting pixel representation, i.e. the length a pixel represents in the measuring plane,<br />
increases as mentioned before. Hence, the precision decreases.<br />
In each experiment a charge of 50 tubes (transparent and black) of 30mm and 70mm<br />
length and 8mm diameter is used as test data. Each charge has been measured by hand and<br />
is evaluated with respect to mean and standard deviation. Each tube passes the measuring<br />
area once in this experiment and is measured as often as possible (single measurements)<br />
while it is in the visual field of the camera. The mean over the computed total lengths<br />
as well as the standard deviation are determined and compared to the ground truth data.<br />
The results are summarized in Table 5.8 and visualized in Figure 5.21 in terms of Gaussian<br />
distributions.<br />
The number of per tube measurements ΩPTM of 30mm tubes is slightly smaller compared<br />
to experiments with 50mm tubes at the same velocity. This is due to the smaller<br />
field of view of the camera. Obviously the tubes leave the measuring area faster. However,<br />
there are still more than 3 single measurements of each tube both for black and transparent<br />
tubes on average. The larger 70mm tubes have been measured even more often<br />
than 50mm tubes with 6.12 single measurements for black and 4.85 for transparent tubes<br />
respectively. This can be explained by a larger field of view.<br />
The mean value over a sequence of tubes µseq equals the expectation µGT in almost<br />
all experiments. Only the 30mm transparent tubes differ from the ground truth of about<br />
0.01mm which is acceptable small. This indicates the calibration factor between pixels<br />
and mm has been trained perfectly in all experiments.<br />
The standard deviation is much smaller for 30mm tubes both in the manual and automated<br />
measurements compared to 70mm tubes. In general black tubes are measured with<br />
higher precision than transparent tubes by the system according to the observations in<br />
previous experiments. The higher precision for 30mm tubes is important with respect to<br />
the specified tolerances (see Table 1.2). In all experiments beside the 70mm black tubes<br />
the manual precision is only slightly better than the precision of the visual inspection<br />
system. However, the results of the system have been always precise enough to allow for<br />
reliable measurements in terms of the allowed tolerances. At 70mm black tubes the system<br />
performed even better than humans with a standard deviation of 0.14 compared to 0.16<br />
measured by hand.<br />
It is important to state that the precision in these experiments depends both on the<br />
measuring variance of the system and the real variance of the tubes. Accordingly one<br />
can not compare the results directly with those in Section 5.3.5 where only one tube was<br />
measured several times in one experiment.<br />
One can conclude the visual inspection system is able to measure also tubes of different<br />
lengths as accurate as humans on average.<br />
5.3.8. Performance<br />
Finally, the performance of the system is evaluated on an Athlon64 FX-55 (2.6GHz, 2GB<br />
RAM) platform.<br />
The total processing time can be divided into five main groups including profile analysis,<br />
compensation for radial distortion, edge detection and template matching, as well as length