12.07.2015 Views

Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice - Åbo Akademi

Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice - Åbo Akademi

Contextual Determinants of Electoral System Choice - Åbo Akademi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ware (1991: 66) point out that there are three basic dimensions to consider as forthe constituency structure. Are there on the whole any constituencies? On whatbasis are the constituencies organized? Are the constituencies single-member ormulti-member? Most countries are divided into constituencies but the electionsmay also be conducted ‘at large’, which means that the whole country is one singleconstituency. The constituencies are usually defined territorially, but may also bedefined by population groups.Plurality and majority systems mostly use single-member districts, whereas PRrequires a minimum <strong>of</strong> two seats per district. Within PR systems, however, thenumber <strong>of</strong> seats varies a lot between countries and between constituencies withincountries. In these countries, the district magnitude is measured by the arithmeticmean <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> representatives to be elected in each constituency. Theremay also be two or even more district levels. In addition to the nominal districtlevel, there may be a national district superimposed on the lower-level districts. InRae’s terminology, this phenomenon is called ‘complex districting’ (1967: 124).The district magnitude is closely related to proportionality. When more seats arebeing allocated in one constituency, the possibility <strong>of</strong> allocating seat shares inaccordance with vote shares equally increases. Several studies have proved thatamong the basic characteristics <strong>of</strong> electoral systems, the district magnitude has thestrongest effect on the overall proportionality <strong>of</strong> election results (Gallagher 1991:33-51; Jones 1993: 64-66; Lijphart 1994b; Sartori 1986: 53; Taagepera andShugart 1989b: 112-125).2.1.3 <strong>Electoral</strong> FormulaThe electoral formula determines how votes are translated into seats. There are,broadly speaking, three methods by which votes can be allocated to seats. Seatscan be allocated to a candidate or a party winning a plurality <strong>of</strong> the vote, a majority<strong>of</strong> the vote, or proportionally among the competitors. In this manner, one maydistinguish between plurality formulas, majority formulas and proportionalformulas. In addition, some electoral systems combine the proportional formulawith the plurality or the majority formula in one election. These are called mixedelectoral systems. Despite the large range <strong>of</strong> voting procedures, all electoralformulas constitute subtypes <strong>of</strong> these four categories. This study makes use <strong>of</strong> thetraditional approach in classifying electoral systems, i.e. according to electoral15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!