Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2012

List of Figures and TablesTable 1.6.Table 1.7.Table 1.8.Table 1.9.Table 1.10.Change in key macroeconomic indicators comparedto the baseline option 30Change in key macroeconomic indicators comparedto the baseline option 31Change in key macroeconomic indicators comparedto the baseline option 32Change in key macroeconomic indicators comparedto the baseline option 33Assessment of the gap in economic efficiencyand scientific and technological developmentcompared to the OECD countries 34Table 1.11. Assessment of integration effects at the sectoral level 35Table 1.12.Table 3.1.Table 3.2.Sectoral breakdown of the Ukrainian economy,in constant prices 38Comparative analysis of the CU CCT andKyrgyzstan’s CT 66-70The structure of Kyrgyzstan’s state budgetrevenues 73Table 5.1. Three concepts of Eurasia 86Table 6.1. CAREC Operations in 2001-2010 109Table 7.1. Grouping indicators for the CIS countries 123Table 7.2.Table 8.1.Table 8.2.Table 8.3.Table 8.4.Geographical distribution of trade in the CIScountries 127Accumulated exported and imported directinvestment in CIS countries and Georgiaas at late 2010 131The geography of accumulated direct investmentof CIS countries as at late 2010 132The geography of Ukrainian direct investmentaccumulated abroad (share capital) 133Projects involving direct investment in CIScountries and Georgia (as at late 2011) 138Table 8.5. Accumulated FDI in Russia, by country 140Table 8.6.Table 8.7.The largest FDI pairs in the post-Soviet spacenot involving Russia 141The largest investment projects in the MMI CISdatabase 142-143Table 8.8. The key recipients of direct investment 144Table 10.1.Cargo transported between EurAsEC member statesby road, rail and air in 2010 165 EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2012