4.5.2 Option 1 – changes <strong>to</strong> Article 9(4)Article 9(4) does not give <strong>the</strong> INCB any direct powers <strong>to</strong> limit non-medical and nonscientificcultivation, production, manufacture and use of <strong>drug</strong>s within <strong>the</strong> terri<strong>to</strong>ries ofco<strong>un</strong>tries, but it provides for <strong>the</strong> INCB <strong>to</strong> endeavour <strong>to</strong> do this in cooperation withParties. This would be co<strong>un</strong>ter <strong>to</strong> allowing Parties <strong>to</strong> permit non-commercial domesticactions in relation <strong>to</strong> small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s for o<strong>the</strong>r than medical or scientificpurposes <strong>un</strong>der Option 1. It would also be inconsistent with allowing Parties <strong>to</strong> permitnon-medical and non-scientific domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>un</strong>der Option 2. Therefore,<strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions <strong>un</strong>der Article 9(4) in relation <strong>to</strong> domestic <strong>drug</strong> controlwould need <strong>to</strong> be limited <strong>to</strong> commercial and/or larger than small-scale actions <strong>un</strong>derOption 1. The nature of <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions <strong>un</strong>der Article 9(4) would need <strong>to</strong>substantially change <strong>un</strong>der Option 2.The proposed new Article 3 bis would exempt non-commercial actions in relation <strong>to</strong>small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s from <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> Convention. Since Article 9(4) isexpressed <strong>to</strong> be ‘subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> terms of this Convention’, <strong>the</strong> technical effect of <strong>the</strong> newarticle would be <strong>to</strong> confine <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions set out in Article 9(4) − thatis, limiting cultivation, production, manufacture and use of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> an amo<strong>un</strong>t requiredfor medical and scientific purposes − only <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong>se actions are <strong>un</strong>dertakencommercially and/or involve more than a small quantity of <strong>drug</strong>s. In addition, <strong>the</strong> thirdof <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions <strong>un</strong>der paragraph 4 is <strong>to</strong> prevent ‘illicit cultivation, productionand manufacture of <strong>drug</strong>s, and illicit trafficking in and use of <strong>drug</strong>s’. The effect of <strong>the</strong>new provision would be that cultivation, production, manufacture of, and trade in,small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s for non-commercial purposes would no longer be governed by<strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Convention, and accordingly, would no longer be ‘illicit’. (Thedefinition of ‘illicit traffic’ in Article 1 of <strong>the</strong> Convention – ‘cultivation or trafficking in<strong>drug</strong>s contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions of this Convention’ – indicates that ‘illicit’ is intended <strong>to</strong>mean contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Convention.) Therefore, technically, <strong>the</strong> INCB’sf<strong>un</strong>ctions <strong>un</strong>der <strong>the</strong> Convention would no longer include endeavouring <strong>to</strong> prevent noncommercialactions in relation <strong>to</strong> small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s, and <strong>the</strong>re would be no needfor direct amendment of Article 9(4) for <strong>the</strong> purposes of Option 1.However, relying on <strong>the</strong> new provision alone may not sufficiently signal that <strong>the</strong>intention is <strong>to</strong> limit <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions in this way, and may not affect how <strong>the</strong> INCBoperates in practice. A specific amendment <strong>to</strong> Article 9, paragraph 4 may be needed <strong>to</strong>make it clear that <strong>the</strong> INCB is no longer intended <strong>to</strong> have f<strong>un</strong>ctions or powers <strong>to</strong> preven<strong>to</strong>r limit non-commercial actions in relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>drug</strong>s. Therefore, it is proposed thatArticle 9(4) should be amended directly <strong>to</strong> restrict <strong>the</strong> INCB’s f<strong>un</strong>ctions <strong>to</strong> endeavouring<strong>to</strong> limit commercial production, manufacture and use of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> an adequate amo<strong>un</strong>trequired for medical and scientific purposes.4.5.3 Option 1 – amendment of Article 9(4)In Article 9(4), after ‘limit’, insert ‘commercial’.91
Article 9. Composition and F<strong>un</strong>ctions of <strong>the</strong> Board4. The Board, in co-operation with Governments, and subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> terms of thisConvention, shall endeavour <strong>to</strong> limit <strong>the</strong> commercial cultivation, production,manufacture and use of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> an adequate amo<strong>un</strong>t required for medical and scientificpurposes, <strong>to</strong> ensure <strong>the</strong>ir availability for such purposes and <strong>to</strong> prevent illicit cultivation,production and manufacture of, and illicit trafficking in and use of, <strong>drug</strong>s.4.5.4 Option 2 – changes <strong>to</strong> Article 9(4)The f<strong>un</strong>ctions of <strong>the</strong> INCB would need <strong>to</strong> be changed such that it would no longer haveany role in limiting <strong>the</strong> creation (cultivation, production, or manufacture), import,export, supply or use of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes, because <strong>the</strong> purposeof Option 2 is <strong>to</strong> allow Parties <strong>to</strong> permit non-medical and non-scientific markets in<strong>drug</strong>s. The INCB would continue <strong>to</strong> have <strong>the</strong> f<strong>un</strong>ction of endeavouring <strong>to</strong> prevent illicitinternational trade in <strong>drug</strong>s. However, ‘illicit' international trade would no longer meanany non-medical and non-scientific import or export of <strong>drug</strong>s. Instead, it would becomeinternational import or export of <strong>drug</strong>s in breach of applicable control measures, orexport of <strong>drug</strong>s for non-medical and non-scientific use <strong>to</strong> co<strong>un</strong>tries that do not havelegal domestic non-medical/non-scientific markets.Parties would be subject <strong>to</strong> obligations <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>the</strong> control measures in <strong>the</strong> Convention<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> creation, supply and use of <strong>drug</strong>s for non-medical and non-scientific purposes, aswell as for medical and scientific purposes, for example, controls on <strong>the</strong> production ofopium, <strong>the</strong> cultivation of <strong>the</strong> opium poppy, coca bush and cannabis plant, and <strong>the</strong>manufacture of <strong>drug</strong>s. Accordingly, it seems reasonable that <strong>the</strong> INCB should have arole in moni<strong>to</strong>ring non-medical and non-scientific domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s, andParties’ implementation of <strong>the</strong>se control measures. This moni<strong>to</strong>ring would be consistentwith <strong>the</strong> INCB’s continued role in administering <strong>the</strong> estimates system, and would allowit <strong>to</strong> assess Parties’ adherence <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir Convention obligations. It would also help <strong>the</strong>INCB <strong>to</strong> perform its f<strong>un</strong>ction of endeavouring <strong>to</strong> prevent illicit international trade in<strong>drug</strong>s, by assisting it <strong>to</strong> prevent over-supply of <strong>drug</strong>s and diversion <strong>to</strong> illicitinternational markets.As noted, <strong>the</strong> INCB would continue <strong>to</strong> be responsible for administering <strong>the</strong> estimatessystem, though <strong>the</strong> aim of this would become <strong>to</strong> ensure <strong>the</strong> availability of adequatequantities of <strong>drug</strong>s for medical and scientific purposes, and <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r <strong>the</strong> cultivation,production, manufacture, use and distribution of <strong>drug</strong>s, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>to</strong> limit <strong>the</strong> use anddistribution of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes.To bring about this shift in f<strong>un</strong>ctions of <strong>the</strong> INCB, Article 9(4) would need <strong>to</strong> beamended <strong>to</strong> remove <strong>the</strong> requirements for <strong>the</strong> INCB <strong>to</strong> endeavour <strong>to</strong> limit <strong>the</strong> cultivation,production, manufacture and use of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> an adequate amo<strong>un</strong>t required for medicaland scientific purposes, and <strong>to</strong> prevent <strong>the</strong> illicit cultivation, production, manufacture92
- Page 2 and 3:
ROADMAPS TO REFORMINGTHE UN DRUG CO
- Page 4 and 5:
ContentsPreface ...................
- Page 6 and 7:
PrefaceTHE IDEA FOR this Report cam
- Page 8:
PART I. POSSIBLE ROADMAPS
- Page 11 and 12:
hope for serious progress, but we c
- Page 13 and 14:
We do not underestimate the difficu
- Page 15 and 16:
also imposes requirements concernin
- Page 17 and 18:
domestic market, just as producers
- Page 19 and 20:
Protocol strengthened some provisio
- Page 21 and 22:
ut considerably less potency than s
- Page 23 and 24:
has announced its intention to reac
- Page 25 and 26:
objected to. Concerning the 1971 tr
- Page 27 and 28:
Table 2. Summary of reservations to
- Page 29 and 30:
Reservations about traditional use
- Page 31 and 32:
As Swaine notes, ‘the Vienna Conv
- Page 33 and 34:
unhappy about a country implementin
- Page 35 and 36:
Preemption by a new ‘single conve
- Page 37 and 38:
and their effort was rejected by a
- Page 39 and 40:
national or subnational level. Proh
- Page 42 and 43:
Chapter 5. Proposed treaty amendmen
- Page 44 and 45:
Article 1. DefinitionsExcept where
- Page 46 and 47:
Article 36 - penal provisionsIn Art
- Page 48 and 49:
Article 7. Special Provisions regar
- Page 50 and 51: and to ensure adequate supplies of
- Page 52 and 53: Article 1 − definition of ‘cons
- Page 54 and 55: Article 19 - estimates of drug requ
- Page 56 and 57: Article 21. Limitation of Manufactu
- Page 58 and 59: contrary to a law or regulation ado
- Page 60 and 61: 1. in subparagraph (a):a) after ‘
- Page 62 and 63: ) for ‘in accordance with paragra
- Page 64 and 65: include a number of general stateme
- Page 66 and 67: the legality of drug possession. A
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 7. Conforming the 1961 Conv
- Page 70 and 71: solely by Article 30, which require
- Page 72 and 73: on trade activities referred to in
- Page 74 and 75: (c) Require that licensed manufactu
- Page 76 and 77: issued in the form of counterfoil b
- Page 78: APPENDIXDETAILED COMMENTARY ON AMEN
- Page 81 and 82: Articles 21-34 of the Convention im
- Page 83 and 84: dispatch, transport, supply, purcha
- Page 85 and 86: actions involving commercial quanti
- Page 87 and 88: In the 1971 Convention the followin
- Page 89 and 90: 4.1.3 Option 2 - changes to Preambl
- Page 91 and 92: separate estimates and statistical
- Page 93 and 94: After ‘scientific research’, in
- Page 95 and 96: would also include transforming a d
- Page 97 and 98: (c) subject to the provisions of th
- Page 99: endangered’ by a Party’s failur
- Page 103 and 104: 2. The Board shall, in respect of c
- Page 105 and 106: for the right of the INCB to establ
- Page 107 and 108: ) Subject to the deductions referre
- Page 109 and 110: excess quantity must be deducted fr
- Page 111 and 112: prohibition in Article 31(1)(b) aga
- Page 113 and 114: 4.8 Article 20 - statistical return
- Page 115 and 116: separate returns would be required
- Page 117 and 118: 4.9.1 General comments on Article 2
- Page 119 and 120: distributors), and any quantity tak
- Page 121 and 122: a) The quantity consumed, within th
- Page 123 and 124: Article 21 bis. Limitation of Produ
- Page 125 and 126: to engage in cultivation; and culti
- Page 127 and 128: the purposes of Option 2. However,
- Page 129 and 130: in Article 29 to manufacture of mor
- Page 131 and 132: ) (i) Require medical prescriptions
- Page 133 and 134: 4.15 Article 31(1) - international
- Page 135 and 136: commercial use. Export to a state o
- Page 137 and 138: would automatically mean that posse
- Page 139 and 140: preparatory acts, conspiracy and at
- Page 141 and 142: offering for sale, distribution, 17
- Page 143 and 144: Article 36. Penal Provisions1. a) S
- Page 145 and 146: Article 36. Penal Provisions1. a) S
- Page 147 and 148: Conference would have intended to a
- Page 149 and 150: drugs (in more than small quantitie
- Page 151 and 152:
substances into its country or one
- Page 153 and 154:
apply to Schedule 1 substances. In
- Page 155 and 156:
substances (of more than a small qu
- Page 157 and 158:
1. The Parties shall require that t
- Page 159 and 160:
individuals may lawfully obtain, us
- Page 161 and 162:
4. The Parties shall furnish to the
- Page 163 and 164:
2. In subparagraph (b):a) after ‘
- Page 165 and 166:
obligations on Parties in respect o
- Page 167 and 168:
penalise preparatory acts in connec
- Page 169 and 170:
accordance with subparagraph (a) of
- Page 171 and 172:
Article 3(1)(c)(iii) warrants speci
- Page 173 and 174:
6.1.2. Option 1 - changes to the 19
- Page 175 and 176:
uncertainty. Accordingly, Article 3
- Page 177 and 178:
Consequently, Parties would also no
- Page 179:
…4. d) The Parties may provide, e