12.07.2015 Views

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5. Proposed treaty amendments <strong>to</strong> allow possessionand use, or <strong>to</strong> allow regulated domestic markets1. Two Options in Amending <strong>the</strong> UN Drug ConventionsIN THIS CHAPTER we turn <strong>to</strong> proposing treaty language which would adapt <strong>the</strong> presentinternational <strong>drug</strong> control framework <strong>to</strong> allow for national or subnational experimentsin two directions. The first alternative involves proposing minimum changes <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>major international <strong>drug</strong> <strong>conventions</strong> that would <strong>un</strong>ambiguously allow Parties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>Conventions <strong>to</strong> permit <strong>the</strong> use and possession of <strong>drug</strong>s for o<strong>the</strong>r than commercialpurposes. The second alternative, which includes <strong>the</strong> first, proposes more significantchanges that would allow Parties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conventions <strong>to</strong> legalise domestic markets andinternational trade in <strong>drug</strong>s (between co<strong>un</strong>tries with legal domestic markets), and make<strong>the</strong>ir own decisions about how domestic markets should be regulated.Section 2 below explains <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> first of <strong>the</strong>se options, and section 3 spells out<strong>the</strong> actual amendments of <strong>the</strong> treaties which are proposed <strong>to</strong> put this option in<strong>to</strong> effect.In parallel fashion, section 4 explains <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong> second option, and sections 5spells out <strong>the</strong> actual amendments <strong>to</strong> put <strong>the</strong> option in<strong>to</strong> effect.The rationales for <strong>the</strong> language proposed here are more fully discussed in <strong>the</strong> Appendixof this volume. Since Option 2 includes within it Option 1, <strong>the</strong> general discussion in <strong>the</strong>Appendix deals with both options, while maintaining a separation concerning <strong>the</strong>changes in treaty language proposed for Option 1 and for Option 2.2. Option 1 – remove obligations <strong>to</strong> prohibit actions relating<strong>to</strong> personal use of <strong>drug</strong>sThis option would involve making changes <strong>to</strong> wording in <strong>the</strong> Conventions that wouldrelieve Parties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conventions from existing obligations <strong>to</strong> prohibit (through legal oradministrative measures) personal use or possession of <strong>drug</strong>s, or cultivation,production, manufacture, supply, acquisition, purchase, import or export of <strong>drug</strong>s,when <strong>the</strong>se actions involved only a small quantity of <strong>drug</strong>s and were for o<strong>the</strong>r thancommercial purposes.The aim of <strong>the</strong>se changes would be <strong>to</strong> allow Parties <strong>to</strong> elect not <strong>to</strong> prohibit personal useor possession of <strong>drug</strong>s, or o<strong>the</strong>r actions relating <strong>to</strong> personal use of <strong>drug</strong>s. Personal use of<strong>drug</strong>s would refer <strong>to</strong> consumption of <strong>drug</strong>s by an individual, including for non-medicalpurposes. These changes would allow people <strong>to</strong> use <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>the</strong>mselves, supply smallquantities of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs for <strong>the</strong>ir personal use, transfer small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>sbetween co<strong>un</strong>tries for <strong>the</strong>ir own or o<strong>the</strong>rs’ personal use, or produce, cultivate,manufacture, purchase, acquire or possess small quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s for <strong>the</strong>se purposes.Currently <strong>un</strong>der <strong>the</strong> Conventions, Parties are required <strong>to</strong> limit international anddomestic markets in narcotic <strong>drug</strong>s and psychotropic substances, and not <strong>to</strong> allowpossession and use of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>drug</strong>s and substances except for medical and scientificpurposes. Subject <strong>to</strong> certain limited exceptions, Parties must prohibit <strong>the</strong> cultivation,production, manufacture, distribution of, trade in, and possession of <strong>drug</strong>s, for o<strong>the</strong>r33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!