12.07.2015 Views

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

made a reservation concerning criminalising possession or purchase for personalconsumption (§2), as well as on provisions urging that offences <strong>un</strong>der <strong>the</strong> article beregarded as serious, and be treated with limits on discretion and with long statutes oflimitations (§§6,7,8). The Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands also reserved concerning §§6, 7 and 8, anddeclared a number of ‘<strong>un</strong>derstandings’ upon signing <strong>the</strong> treaty concerning Article 3 and<strong>the</strong> definition of ‘illicit traffic’ in Article 1.Yemen’s reservation is open-ended, reserving its ‘right <strong>to</strong> enter reservations in respect <strong>to</strong>such articles as it may see fit at a time subsequent <strong>to</strong> this signature’.Seventeen parties, including European Union members, Mexico, Turkey and <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates, filed objections <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> reservations <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1988 treaty. The objections concernedmatters of extradition, confiscation, mutual assistance, and <strong>the</strong> law of <strong>the</strong> sea. Only <strong>the</strong>U.S. objection <strong>to</strong> Colombia’s reservations and declarations makes reference <strong>to</strong> areservation concerning Article 3. The objections do not block any of <strong>the</strong> reservations,since <strong>the</strong> 1988 treaty has no specific provision which allows that. However, several of <strong>the</strong>objections considered <strong>the</strong> reservation in question ‘<strong>to</strong> be contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> object andpurpose of <strong>the</strong> Convention’ – as France stated, for instance, concerning Lebanon’sreservations concerning banking secrecy, and Vietnam’s concerning extradition.As noted, France’s language here points <strong>to</strong> possible challenges of future reservations<strong>un</strong>der <strong>the</strong> 1969 Vienna Convention on <strong>the</strong> Law of Treaties. But what is meant by <strong>the</strong>‘object and purpose’ of a treaty, as a leading treatise on international law notes drily, ‘isnot free from <strong>un</strong>certainty’. 52 A footnote <strong>to</strong> this statement quotes two guidelines <strong>to</strong>practice, in draft <strong>the</strong>n but now adopted by <strong>the</strong> International Law Commission, which donot do much <strong>to</strong> give a more specific meaning:3.1.5 Incompatibility of a reservation with <strong>the</strong> object and purpose of <strong>the</strong> treatyA reservation is incompatible with <strong>the</strong> object and purpose of <strong>the</strong> treaty if it affectsan essential element of <strong>the</strong> treaty that is necessary <strong>to</strong> its general tenor, in such away that <strong>the</strong> reservation impairs <strong>the</strong> raison d’être of <strong>the</strong> treaty.3.1.5.1 Determination of <strong>the</strong> object and purpose of <strong>the</strong> treatyThe object and purpose of <strong>the</strong> treaty is <strong>to</strong> be determined in good faith, takingacco<strong>un</strong>t of <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> treaty in <strong>the</strong>ir context, in particular <strong>the</strong> title and <strong>the</strong>preamble of <strong>the</strong> treaty. Recourse may also be had <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> prepara<strong>to</strong>ry work of <strong>the</strong>treaty and <strong>the</strong> circumstances of its conclusion and, where appropriate, <strong>the</strong>subsequent practice of <strong>the</strong> parties. 5352Shaw, M.N. International Law, 6 th edition. 1 st South Asian edition, p. 921. Cambridge, etc.: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2010.53International Law Commission. Guide <strong>to</strong> Practice on Reservations <strong>to</strong> Treaties, 2011. New York: UnitedNations, 2011. http://<strong>un</strong>treaty.<strong>un</strong>.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/1_8_2011.pdf(accessed 7 April, 2012).21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!