roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
for personal consumption contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention, <strong>the</strong> 1961Convention as amended or <strong>the</strong> 1971 Convention.…4.…d) The Parties may provide, ei<strong>the</strong>r as an alternative <strong>to</strong> conviction or p<strong>un</strong>ishment, or inaddition <strong>to</strong> conviction or p<strong>un</strong>ishment of an offence any offence with respect <strong>to</strong> narcotic<strong>drug</strong>s or psychotropic substances established in accordance with paragraph 2 o<strong>the</strong>r thanas required by paragraph 1 of this article, measures for <strong>the</strong> treatment, education,aftercare, rehabilitation or social reintegration of <strong>the</strong> offender.4. Option 2 − remove obligations <strong>to</strong> prohibit domestic nonmedicaland non-scientific markets in <strong>drug</strong>sThe purpose of this option is <strong>to</strong> allow Parties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conventions <strong>to</strong> legalise domesticmarkets and international trade in controlled substances that will be used for o<strong>the</strong>r thanmedical or scientific purposes. Under Option 2, Parties would no longer be required <strong>to</strong>limit cultivation, production, manufacture, domestic trade, distribution, use orpossession of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes. Nor would Parties be required <strong>to</strong>limit import and export of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>se purposes. However, <strong>the</strong>y would continue <strong>to</strong> beprohibited from allowing <strong>the</strong> export of <strong>drug</strong>s o<strong>the</strong>r than in accordance with <strong>the</strong>receiving co<strong>un</strong>try or terri<strong>to</strong>ry’s laws and regulations, and <strong>the</strong>y would still be required <strong>to</strong>control import and export <strong>un</strong>der licence, control all parties and enterprises <strong>un</strong>dertakingimport and export, and require specific import and export authorisations. In addition, ifParties were <strong>to</strong> decide <strong>to</strong> permit domestic non-medical and non-scientific markets in<strong>drug</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>y would also be required <strong>to</strong> apply most of <strong>the</strong> existing control measures in <strong>the</strong>Conventions <strong>to</strong> those markets. For example, Parties would be required <strong>to</strong> ensure (<strong>un</strong>derArticles 23, 26 and 28 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) that cultivation of and domestic trade inopium poppy, cannabis and coca for non-medical and non-scientific purposes would becontrolled by a government agency. They would also be required <strong>to</strong> ensure (<strong>un</strong>derArticles 29 and 30 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention and Articles 7 and 8 of <strong>the</strong> 1971 Convention)that <strong>the</strong> manufacture, domestic trade in, and distribution of <strong>drug</strong>s for non-medical ornon-scientific purposes would be <strong>un</strong>der licence or authorisation. It is also proposed<strong>un</strong>der Option 2 that <strong>the</strong> requirements for co<strong>un</strong>tries and terri<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>to</strong> furnish estimates(in Article 19 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) and statistical returns in relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>drug</strong> useand production (in Article 20 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention and Article 16(4) of <strong>the</strong> 1971Convention) and <strong>to</strong> prevent manufacture and import beyond <strong>the</strong>ir requirements (inArticle 21 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) would be extended <strong>to</strong> non-medical or non-scientificuse of <strong>drug</strong>s.Under Option 2, <strong>the</strong> International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) would no longer beresponsible for limiting domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes.Instead, <strong>the</strong> INCB’s main roles in relation <strong>to</strong> domestic <strong>drug</strong> control would be <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>rmedical and scientific and non-medical and non-scientific domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s40