12.07.2015 Views

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

for personal consumption contrary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention, <strong>the</strong> 1961Convention as amended or <strong>the</strong> 1971 Convention.…4.…d) The Parties may provide, ei<strong>the</strong>r as an alternative <strong>to</strong> conviction or p<strong>un</strong>ishment, or inaddition <strong>to</strong> conviction or p<strong>un</strong>ishment of an offence any offence with respect <strong>to</strong> narcotic<strong>drug</strong>s or psychotropic substances established in accordance with paragraph 2 o<strong>the</strong>r thanas required by paragraph 1 of this article, measures for <strong>the</strong> treatment, education,aftercare, rehabilitation or social reintegration of <strong>the</strong> offender.4. Option 2 − remove obligations <strong>to</strong> prohibit domestic nonmedicaland non-scientific markets in <strong>drug</strong>sThe purpose of this option is <strong>to</strong> allow Parties <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Conventions <strong>to</strong> legalise domesticmarkets and international trade in controlled substances that will be used for o<strong>the</strong>r thanmedical or scientific purposes. Under Option 2, Parties would no longer be required <strong>to</strong>limit cultivation, production, manufacture, domestic trade, distribution, use orpossession of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes. Nor would Parties be required <strong>to</strong>limit import and export of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>se purposes. However, <strong>the</strong>y would continue <strong>to</strong> beprohibited from allowing <strong>the</strong> export of <strong>drug</strong>s o<strong>the</strong>r than in accordance with <strong>the</strong>receiving co<strong>un</strong>try or terri<strong>to</strong>ry’s laws and regulations, and <strong>the</strong>y would still be required <strong>to</strong>control import and export <strong>un</strong>der licence, control all parties and enterprises <strong>un</strong>dertakingimport and export, and require specific import and export authorisations. In addition, ifParties were <strong>to</strong> decide <strong>to</strong> permit domestic non-medical and non-scientific markets in<strong>drug</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>y would also be required <strong>to</strong> apply most of <strong>the</strong> existing control measures in <strong>the</strong>Conventions <strong>to</strong> those markets. For example, Parties would be required <strong>to</strong> ensure (<strong>un</strong>derArticles 23, 26 and 28 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) that cultivation of and domestic trade inopium poppy, cannabis and coca for non-medical and non-scientific purposes would becontrolled by a government agency. They would also be required <strong>to</strong> ensure (<strong>un</strong>derArticles 29 and 30 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention and Articles 7 and 8 of <strong>the</strong> 1971 Convention)that <strong>the</strong> manufacture, domestic trade in, and distribution of <strong>drug</strong>s for non-medical ornon-scientific purposes would be <strong>un</strong>der licence or authorisation. It is also proposed<strong>un</strong>der Option 2 that <strong>the</strong> requirements for co<strong>un</strong>tries and terri<strong>to</strong>ries <strong>to</strong> furnish estimates(in Article 19 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) and statistical returns in relation <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>drug</strong> useand production (in Article 20 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention and Article 16(4) of <strong>the</strong> 1971Convention) and <strong>to</strong> prevent manufacture and import beyond <strong>the</strong>ir requirements (inArticle 21 of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention) would be extended <strong>to</strong> non-medical or non-scientificuse of <strong>drug</strong>s.Under Option 2, <strong>the</strong> International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) would no longer beresponsible for limiting domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes.Instead, <strong>the</strong> INCB’s main roles in relation <strong>to</strong> domestic <strong>drug</strong> control would be <strong>to</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>rmedical and scientific and non-medical and non-scientific domestic markets in <strong>drug</strong>s40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!