12.07.2015 Views

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Parties would be allowed <strong>to</strong> permit small-scale cultivation, manufacture, production,import and export of <strong>drug</strong>s for personal use, and import, export and distribution ofsmall quantities of <strong>drug</strong>s for o<strong>the</strong>rs’ personal use. They would also be allowed <strong>to</strong> permitpossession of <strong>drug</strong>s for personal use, and personal use itself, whe<strong>the</strong>r or not for medicalpurposes. The new provision would not affect Parties’ obligation <strong>to</strong> limit ‘trade in’ <strong>drug</strong>sexclusively <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposes. Parties would not be allowed <strong>to</strong> permitany of <strong>the</strong>se activities <strong>to</strong> be <strong>un</strong>dertaken for pec<strong>un</strong>iary gain, <strong>un</strong>less for a medical orscientific purpose.The proposed new Article 3 bis would limit <strong>the</strong> scope of Parties’ obligations <strong>un</strong>derArticle 4(c) without any technical need for direct amendment of <strong>the</strong> provision, which isalready subject <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Convention. The new Article 3 bis would make itclear that non-commercial and small-scale actions with respect <strong>to</strong> <strong>drug</strong>s are entirelyexempt from all <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> Convention (o<strong>the</strong>r than Article 30(2)(b)).However, since Article 4(c) sets out Parties’ general obligations <strong>un</strong>der <strong>the</strong> Convention,ideally <strong>the</strong>se obligations should be clear from <strong>the</strong> text of that article, without <strong>the</strong> need <strong>to</strong>refer <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r provisions. Accordingly, it is proposed that Article 4(c) should beamended <strong>to</strong> make it clear that its scope extends only <strong>to</strong> actions that involve more than asmall quantity of <strong>drug</strong>s or that are <strong>un</strong>dertaken for commercial purposes.In addition, <strong>the</strong> reference <strong>to</strong> ‘use’ of <strong>drug</strong>s in Article 4(c) would effectively be madered<strong>un</strong>dant by <strong>the</strong> new Article 3 bis. This is because, for <strong>the</strong> reasons discussed above, it islikely that Parties’ obligation <strong>to</strong> limit ‘use’ of <strong>drug</strong>s <strong>to</strong> medical and scientific purposeswould cover only personal consumption. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>re would be no need <strong>to</strong> retain<strong>the</strong> word ‘use’ in Article 4(c), and <strong>to</strong> do so may give rise <strong>to</strong> <strong>un</strong>certainty as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> effect of<strong>the</strong> new article. Accordingly, it is suggested that ‘use’ should be deleted from Article4(c).4.4.3 Option 1 – amendment of Article 4(c)The following amendments should be made <strong>to</strong> Article 4(c):1. After ‘medical and scientific purposes’:a) insert a colonb) on a new line, insert ‘(i) trade in <strong>drug</strong>s; and’c) on a new line, insert ‘(ii)’2. Delete ‘trade in, use’3. After ‘possession of <strong>drug</strong>s’, insert ‘, <strong>un</strong>less in small quantities and for a noncommercialpurpose’.Article 4. General ObligationsThe parties shall take such legislative and administrative measures as may be necessary:…87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!