roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
roadmaps to reforming the un drug conventions - Beckley Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Parties’ obligations <strong>un</strong>der Articles 29 and 30, as discussed above. Parties would only beobliged <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>the</strong> control measures in Article 8 <strong>to</strong> distribution and manufacture ofpsychotropic substances where <strong>un</strong>dertaken for commercial purposes.It may be that irrespective of <strong>the</strong> new Article 2 bis ‘manufacture’ and ‘distribution’ inArticle 8 would be interpreted as commercial manufacture and distribution, sinceArticle 8 deals with <strong>the</strong> control of trade in psychotropic substances. As noted above, <strong>the</strong>1988 Commentary suggests that ‘distribution’ (as used in <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> 1988Convention dealing with criminalisation of illicit traffic in <strong>drug</strong>s) may be best<strong>un</strong>ders<strong>to</strong>od as meaning <strong>the</strong> commercial role of ensuring that goods pass frommanufacturer or importer <strong>to</strong> wholesaler or retailers. 200 But, as in relation <strong>to</strong> Article 30(1)of <strong>the</strong> 1961 Convention (discussed above), it is also arguable that <strong>the</strong> ordinary meaningof ‘distribution’ is sharing out <strong>to</strong> recipients, and that ‘trade’ and ‘distribution’ in Article8 would not have been intended <strong>to</strong> have overlapping meanings. Therefore, it is alsopossible that ‘distribution’ in Article 8 may include distribution o<strong>the</strong>r than in trade. Thenew Article 2 bis would remove any <strong>un</strong>certainty, and ensure that non-commercialdistribution and manufacture of psychotropic substances were exempt from Article 8.5.3.3. Option 2 – changes <strong>to</strong> Article 8Similarly <strong>un</strong>der Option 2, <strong>the</strong> proposed new Article 2 bis would exempt manufacture,distribution of small quantities of Schedule II, III and IV substances for o<strong>the</strong>r thancommercial purposes from <strong>the</strong> scope of Article 8 so that Parties would not be required <strong>to</strong>apply <strong>the</strong> control measures in Article 8 <strong>to</strong> those activities. However, Parties would berequired <strong>to</strong> apply <strong>the</strong> control measures <strong>to</strong> manufacture and distribution of thosesubstances where more than a small quantity is involved or <strong>the</strong> purpose is commercial,and <strong>to</strong> trade (including international trade) in any quantity of <strong>the</strong> substances, whe<strong>the</strong>r ornot <strong>the</strong> manufacture, distribution or trade were for medical/scientific or nonmedical/non-scientificmarkets.Parties would be required <strong>to</strong> make manufacture, distribution, trade, import and expor<strong>to</strong>f Schedule II, III and IV substances o<strong>the</strong>r than in compliance with <strong>the</strong> Article 8 controlmeasures p<strong>un</strong>ishable offences <strong>un</strong>der Article 22 of <strong>the</strong> 1971 Convention. Article 22 isdiscussed below.5.4. Article 9 – medical prescriptionsPrescriptionsArticle 9 [Existing text]1. The Parties shall require that substances in Schedules II, III and IV be supplied ordispensed for use by individuals pursuant <strong>to</strong> medical prescription only, except when2001988 Commentary, p. 55.149