15 MB - Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[15] St. Lawrence Seaway Management, Transport Canada and St. Lawrence Seaway Devel . US Deptof Transportation. St. Lawrence Seaway Traffic Report 2005 Navigation Season. 2005. 17 May 2006.[16] United States. Maritime Administration. Dept of Transportation. Environmental Advantages ofInland Barge Transportation. 1994.[17] United States. Maritime Administration. Dept of Transportation. Transportation ModeComparison Energy Environment Efficiency. 7 Jan. 2002. 6 June 2006.[18] United States. Institute for Water Resources. Army Corps of Engineers. Status of the HarborMaintenance Trust Fund Fiscal Years 2000, 2001, 2002. 12 June 2006.[19] United States. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Dept of Transportation. GovernmentTransportation Financial Statistics 2003. 2004. 9 June 2006.[20] United States. Congressional Budget Office. Impose a New Harbor-Maintenance Fee. 12 June2006 .[21] The U.S Harbor Maintenance Tax Controversy: Is there a solution? Kumar, Shashi N. " The U.SHarbor Maintenance Tax Controversy: Is There a Solution?" International Journal of Maritime Economics4 (2002): 149-163. 12 June 2006.[22] National Ports & Waterways Institute. Short Sea Vessel Service and Harbor Maintenance Tax.Oct. 2005. Short Sea Shipping Cooperative Program, SCOOP; University of New Orleans. 9 June 2006.[23] Duluth Superior Dredging Report from United States. Detroit District. Army Corps of Engineers.Annual Report/Contract Dredging Report. 10 Feb. 2006. 26 July 2006.[24] The National Dredging Needs Study of Ports and Harbors Planning and ManagementConsultants, Ltd Illinois. The National Dredging Needs Study of Ports and Harbors. 12 June 2006.[25] The National Dredging Needs Study of Ports and Harbors Planning and ManagementConsultants, Ltd Illinois. The National Dredging Needs Study of Ports and Harbors. 12 June 2006.Chapter 3[26] Treasury Education Office. "History of the U.S. Tax System." United States Department of theTreasury. 2002. 13 Sept. 2006 .[27] American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA). "The History of the Harbor MaintenanceTax." AAPA. 2006. 13 Sept. 2006 .[28] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[29] American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA). "The History of the Harbor MaintenanceTax." AAPA. 2006. 13 Sept. 2006 .[30] Kumar, Shashi. "User Charges for Port Cost Recovery: the US Harbour Maintenance TaxControversy." International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (2002): 149-163. 13 Sept. 2006.46
[31] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[32] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[33] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[34] American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA). "The History of the Harbor MaintenanceTax." AAPA. 2006. 13 Sept. 2006 .[35] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[36] Kumar, Shashi. "User Charges for Port Cost Recovery: the US Harbour Maintenance TaxControversy." International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (2002): 149-163. 13 Sept. 2006.[37] Kumar, Shashi. "User Charges for Port Cost Recovery: the US Harbour Maintenance TaxControversy." International Journal of Maritime Economics 4 (2002): 149-163. 13 Sept. 2006.[38] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[39] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[40] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[41] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 ..[42] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[43] Evansville Airport v. Delta Airlines. No. 405 U.S. 707. United States Supreme Court. 19 Apr.1972. 13 Sept. 2006 .[44] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[45] Pace v. Burgess. No. 92 U.S. 372. United States Supreme Court. Oct. 1875. 13 Sept. 2006.[46] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .[47] United States V. United States Shoe Corporation. No. 97-372. Supreme Court of the UnitedStates. 31 Mar. 1998. 13 Sept. 2006 .47
Page 3 and 4:
Mission StatementThe Great Lakes Ma
Page 5 and 6:
Technical Report Documentation1. Re
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTSOverview and Backg
Page 9 and 10:
Overview and Background:During Marc
Page 11 and 12:
Advisory Board:One of the first tas
Page 13 and 14:
University of MichiganDr. Armin Tro
Page 15 and 16:
Specific Project Awards to Universi
Page 17 and 18:
- October 8, 2005 GLMRI Affiliate U
Page 19 and 20:
- October 7, 2006 The 2 nd GLMRI Af
Page 21 and 22:
SeawaySized Bulk Carrier Model fo
Page 23 and 24:
Table of Contentspage1. Introductio
Page 25 and 26:
List of FigurespageFigure 2.1: Typi
Page 27 and 28:
2. BackgroundThe initial Sea Grant
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 2.2: Typical Forward Plenum
Page 31 and 32:
Table 3.1: BallastFree Bulk Carri
Page 33 and 34:
4. Model Construction ConstraintsTh
Page 35 and 36:
6. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CF
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6.3: Velocity Vectors at the
Page 39 and 40:
8. Model ConstructionThe model of t
Page 41 and 42:
9. Potential Economic Impacts of th
Page 43:
Expanding Regional Freight Informat
Page 47 and 48:
___________________________________
Page 49 and 50:
Workshop participants also effectiv
Page 51 and 52:
information to share with governmen
Page 53 and 54:
Most of this information has been c
Page 55 and 56:
A New Perspective on Information De
Page 57 and 58:
• Assemble data and report inform
Page 59 and 60:
Looking Ahead: Next StepsThe main o
Page 61 and 62:
Again, according to MISNA, the mari
Page 63:
References Cited[1] Maritime Inform
Page 67:
Schematic Diagram of the Structure
Page 71 and 72:
Example 1: Basic Mapping FunctionsF
Page 73 and 74:
Figure B.7User now queries the port
Page 75 and 76:
Example 3: Mapping the NetworkFigur
Page 77:
APPENDIX CCode Specifications for G
Page 80 and 81:
Michigan: 01 Alpena 19 Marine C
Page 83:
APPENDIX DMeeting Participants in t
Page 86:
Tax Systems and Barriersto Great La
Page 89 and 90:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 91 and 92: The HMT Generates Substantially Mor
Page 93 and 94: vii
Page 95 and 96: paid by the now terminated Incan Su
Page 97 and 98: Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 Research
Page 99 and 100: presentation, “A Transportation I
Page 101 and 102: − United States General Accountin
Page 103 and 104: − Short Sea Vessel Service and Ha
Page 105 and 106: Detailed views of these data presen
Page 107 and 108: Guarantee Fee for MARAD'sTitle XI P
Page 109 and 110: Table 2.4: Great Lakes Assessments
Page 115 and 116: Table 2.10: Duty Assessments on Gre
Page 117 and 118: Certification Fee for Payment of Ve
Page 119 and 120: 6) HMT TablesAs noted above and in
Page 121 and 122: Table 2.14: Total Bid Dollars by Co
Page 123 and 124: 2003 Arcadia Harbor, Mi $33,2462003
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 3: The U.S. Harbor Maintena
Page 127 and 128: providing for - (1) revenue from im
Page 129 and 130: Community’s RC. No panel has been
Page 131 and 132: evenue to fund current and future h
Page 133 and 134: The Support for Harbor Investment P
Page 135 and 136: Table 3.3: Percent Change in U.S. F
Page 137 and 138: Harbor Maintenance Tax Time Line198
Page 139 and 140: Table 4.3: Output ImpactIndustry Di
Page 141: ReferencesChapter 1[1] Stewart, Ric
Page 145 and 146: [66] American Association of Port A
Page 147 and 148: Appendix A: Tax Inventory DataSourc
Page 149 and 150: Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
Page 155 and 156: 31 U.S.C. 9701; P.L. 100-710, 46 C.
Page 157 and 158: Merchant Marine Act of 1936 as amen
Page 159 and 160: Reform Act of 1998, P. L. 105-258,
Page 161 and 162: Appendix C: Detailed HMT TimelineHA
Page 163 and 164: complete and refunds are issued.Imp
Page 165 and 166: There was unexpected good news for
Page 167 and 168: Articles... assembled abroad in who
Page 169 and 170: that each and every regulation is s
Page 171 and 172: Another challenge to the HMF as app
Page 173 and 174: Appendix D: Estimating Harbor Maint
Page 175 and 176: D-3
Page 177 and 178: Alternatives to Petroleum Based Fue
Page 179 and 180: Table of ContentsExecutive Summary
Page 181 and 182: Table 4.10:Great Lakes Biodiesel Pl
Page 183 and 184: of a longterm lowtemperature st
Page 185 and 186: Chapter 1: Overview1.1 Introduction
Page 187 and 188: Chapter 2: Biodiesel: An Alternativ
Page 189 and 190: 2.2.2 Properties of BiodieselThe pr
Page 191 and 192: e renewable fuels (e.g. ethanol and
Page 193 and 194:
2.4 Engine Test DataSummaries of th
Page 195 and 196:
OEM manufacturer should be consulte
Page 197 and 198:
A review of the literature addressi
Page 199 and 200:
credit and a biodiesel mixture cred
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 2: U.S. Diesel DemandMoving
Page 203 and 204:
Demand Forecast. Table 3.4 below sh
Page 205 and 206:
fuels (ethanol and biodiesel) be us
Page 207 and 208:
Minnesota incentivesTable 3.11: Min
Page 209 and 210:
Figure 3: Glycerin as Market RiskSo
Page 211 and 212:
Figure 4: Great Lakes Region IMPLAN
Page 213 and 214:
Definitions used in this report:Mea
Page 215 and 216:
column shows that in Year 1 of cons
Page 217 and 218:
Operations. Tables below show the e
Page 219 and 220:
When operations for the biodiesel p
Page 221 and 222:
verify that separation of the blend
Page 223 and 224:
was considered the hot topic, very
Page 225 and 226:
ReferencesChapter 1No referencesCha
Page 227 and 228:
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p37
Page 229 and 230:
Appendix A: Demand and Supply Suppo
Page 231 and 232:
Table A2: Minnesota Soybean Produ
Page 233 and 234:
Table A6: Marine Diesel Sales, Co
Page 236:
Table of ContentsSections Page #1.
Page 239 and 240:
2. Introduction: Background and Obj
Page 241 and 242:
3. MethodsThe LLO has a surveygra
Page 243 and 244:
Figure 2. Sidescan sonar mosaic of
Page 245 and 246:
Figure 4. Single track (detailed) s
Page 247 and 248:
Figure 7. Single track (detailed) s
Page 249 and 250:
Figure 10. Detailed multibeam bathy
Page 251 and 252:
5. Potential Economic Impacts of th
Page 253 and 254:
Final Report: Great Lakes Maritime
Page 255 and 256:
Evaluation Measures and ResultsTo e
Page 257 and 258:
Appendix ASummary of Publicity & Re
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix BGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix DGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
Page 263 and 264:
REFERENCESDuluth Port Authority. 20
Page 265 and 266:
Steel Starts Here (12:00 minutes) b
Page 267 and 268:
Appendix FGreat Lakes Shipping: Did
Page 269 and 270:
15. What are the top 3 products shi
Page 271 and 272:
Properly Loaded Ship Listing ShipHO
Page 273 and 274:
FoghornGreenhouse gasGroundedHarbor
show all

15 MB - Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?