- Page 4 and 5: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 6 and 7: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 8 and 9: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 10 and 11: The faculty and administrators of t
- Page 12 and 13: Mr. Adolph OjardChairman, American
- Page 14 and 15: Initial Research Focus: After the i
- Page 16 and 17: Outreach Events, Presentations and
- Page 18 and 19: - May 19, 2006 Dr. Stewart was keyn
- Page 20 and 21: - Testing Relationships between Pro
- Page 22 and 23: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 24 and 25: This page intentionally left blank.
- Page 26 and 27: 1. IntroductionThe BallastFree Sh
- Page 28 and 29: maintain the vessel’s capacity to
- Page 30 and 31: 3. General Description of Design Pr
- Page 32 and 33: Figure 3.3: BallastFree Bulk Carr
- Page 34 and 35: 5. Model Propeller Selection and Ge
- Page 36 and 37: Figure 6.1: Pressure Contours Veloc
- Page 38 and 39: 7. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CF
- Page 40 and 41: Figure 8.2: Aft Portion of the Scal
- Page 42 and 43: 10. ReferencesBallast Water News (2
- Page 45: Table of Contents__________________
- Page 48 and 49: 6. Port Operations Data such as Ton
- Page 50 and 51: ___________________________________
- Page 52 and 53:
Data AcquisitionMuch of the data ac
- Page 54 and 55:
1. Commodity type (SIC, NAICS) of e
- Page 56 and 57:
“follow the cargo” to consider
- Page 58 and 59:
Meeting participants contributed a
- Page 60 and 61:
Given the inherent spatial nature o
- Page 62 and 63:
ConclusionThe initial phase of the
- Page 65:
APPENDIX ASchematic Diagram of the
- Page 69:
APPENDIX BSample of Map Output from
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure B.4MWFV provides users with
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure B.10User points to a single
- Page 76 and 77:
Example 4: Linking the GreatLakes M
- Page 79 and 80:
Code Specifications for Great Lakes
- Page 81:
Pennsylvania: 01 ErieQuebec: 01
- Page 85 and 86:
ATTENDEESName Organization TitleJef
- Page 88 and 89:
AcknowledgementsResearch Team:UMD L
- Page 90 and 91:
Table of ContentsExecutive Summary.
- Page 92 and 93:
Great Lakes Panama Canal Commission
- Page 94 and 95:
Executive SummaryThis project inven
- Page 96 and 97:
of Minnesota is reported in 2005 do
- Page 98 and 99:
1.2 Background.Figure 1: Overview o
- Page 100 and 101:
a user fee to support the operation
- Page 102 and 103:
− St. Lawrence Seaway Management,
- Page 104 and 105:
Chapter 2: Great Lakes Maritime Tax
- Page 106 and 107:
transiting the Canal or to pilot th
- Page 108 and 109:
4) Tables of Assessments by Stakeho
- Page 110 and 111:
Table 2.4: Great Lakes Assessments
- Page 112 and 113:
Agreement Filing Under DelegatedAut
- Page 114 and 115:
Agreement Amendment FilingRequiring
- Page 116 and 117:
Table 2.11: Fee Assessments on Grea
- Page 118 and 119:
Petition for Investigation to Deter
- Page 120 and 121:
2.3 Challenges of Great Lakes Marit
- Page 122 and 123:
Detroit District2000 St Clair River
- Page 124 and 125:
2.4 Highlighting the Harbor Mainten
- Page 126 and 127:
some of the first taxes imposed by
- Page 128 and 129:
Problems with the Harbor Maintenanc
- Page 130 and 131:
from Europe) but not on exports is
- Page 132 and 133:
HMT Revenue is a Small Portion of T
- Page 134 and 135:
loaded at a port in the Great Lakes
- Page 136 and 137:
Table 3.5: U.S. Tax Collections and
- Page 138 and 139:
Chapter 4: Potential Economic Impac
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 5. ConclusionAnalysis of th
- Page 142 and 143:
[15] St. Lawrence Seaway Management
- Page 144 and 145:
[48] Swisher International v. Unite
- Page 146 and 147:
[80] Representative English. United
- Page 148 and 149:
Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
- Page 150 and 151:
Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
- Page 152 and 153:
Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix B: Commercial Maritime Ass
- Page 156 and 157:
Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconci
- Page 158 and 159:
Tax Reform Act of 1986, P. L. 99-51
- Page 160 and 161:
U.S. Grains Standards Act, c.313, P
- Page 162 and 163:
HMT UPDATE6/01Wondering what all th
- Page 164 and 165:
01/01With the holding in IBM v. US,
- Page 166 and 167:
The HMT was assessed as a percentag
- Page 168 and 169:
Relying on the holding in Chevron,
- Page 170 and 171:
HMF REPLACEMENT PROPOSED8/98The Cli
- Page 172 and 173:
Depending on the source, Customs ei
- Page 174 and 175:
D-2
- Page 176 and 177:
Lake-wise cargo movements for 2002
- Page 178 and 179:
AcknowledgementsResearch Team:UMD C
- Page 180 and 181:
References ........................
- Page 182 and 183:
Executive SummaryBiodiesel: An Alte
- Page 184 and 185:
gallons per year, should be feasibl
- Page 186 and 187:
Chapter 3: Economic Impacts, Supply
- Page 188 and 189:
Biodiesel, as discussed in this rep
- Page 190 and 191:
volume. The byproduct glycerin ha
- Page 192 and 193:
A few simple “cleansing” steps
- Page 194 and 195:
introduction of ultra low sulfur di
- Page 196 and 197:
A potential problem with maritime o
- Page 198 and 199:
Chapter 3: Biodiesel: An Alternativ
- Page 200 and 201:
productive) than mandating change t
- Page 202 and 203:
From the U.S. domestic marine secto
- Page 204 and 205:
The detail in the U.S. trend for th
- Page 206 and 207:
Cumulative 2005 Payment Information
- Page 208 and 209:
Consumers:Table 3.13: Consumers’
- Page 210 and 211:
Chapter 4:Potential Economic Impact
- Page 212 and 213:
Comprehensive and detailed data cov
- Page 214 and 215:
EmploymentIMPLAN measures of direct
- Page 216 and 217:
Table 4.4: Employment, Impact from
- Page 218 and 219:
Table 4.8: Employment Impacts from
- Page 220 and 221:
Chapter 5: Conclusions and Recommen
- Page 222 and 223:
Studying incentives for fuel emissi
- Page 224 and 225:
- Emissions reduction/improvement i
- Page 226 and 227:
[17] U.S. Environmental Protection
- Page 228 and 229:
Minneosta and St. Olaf College. 200
- Page 230 and 231:
Table A1: Great Lakes States Soyb
- Page 232 and 233:
Table A4: Minnesota Producers of
- Page 234:
Feasibility study: Usefulness of mo
- Page 238 and 239:
1. AbstractThis project is a feasib
- Page 240 and 241:
indications about the source and th
- Page 242 and 243:
4. Results and DiscussionWe success
- Page 244 and 245:
Single track images of the sidescan
- Page 246 and 247:
Figure 6. Single track (detailed) s
- Page 248 and 249:
The multibeam data provide a detail
- Page 250 and 251:
Figure 11. Detailed multibeam bathy
- Page 252 and 253:
6. References1. Farrand, W.R., and
- Page 254 and 255:
Lakes Visitor Center, Marquette cit
- Page 256 and 257:
• I loved being treated like an h
- Page 258 and 259:
Appendix BGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
- Page 260 and 261:
Appendix CGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
- Page 262 and 263:
Appendix EGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
- Page 264 and 265:
Intermodal Freight Transport http:/
- Page 266 and 267:
canals, ships, lighthouses, and muc
- Page 268 and 269:
6. What is “Operation Taconite”
- Page 270 and 271:
Great Lakes Shipping: Did You Know
- Page 272 and 273:
Appendix GGreat Lakes Maritime Ship
- Page 274:
RadarPilothousePortQuarryRangeSaggi