15 MB - Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

From the U.S. domestic marine sector to the Great Lakes detail, we see vessel bunkeringdata by Great Lakes use as almost 170 million gallons in 2004.Table 3.2: Diesel Consumption: Vessel Bunkering, Sales of Distillate Fuel Oil by EnergyUse in the Great Lakes States: 2004 (in thousands of gallons)Destination Vessel Bunkering 2004 % of Great LakesNew York 13,296 8%Pennsylvania 22,964 14%Illinois 107,110 63%Indiana 7,289 4%Michigan 8,792 5%Minnesota 5,367 3%Ohio 3,104 2%Wisconsin 1,949 1%Great Lakes Total 169,871U.S. Total 2,139,643 100%Source: DOE EIAhttp://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/fuel_oil_and_kerosene_sales/historical/2004/foks_2004.html*Note: these data are used in the impact modeling for Chapter 4.Biodiesel B20 prices increased from $1.23 in July in 2002 to a peak of $2.84 inSeptember 2005. The price came back somewhat in February 2006.Table 3.3: U.S. Biodiesel Prices October 2000to February 2006DatePetroleum Diesel($/gal)Biodiesel B20($/gal)10Oct00 1.443Jul01 1.5622Oct01 1.33 1.4711Feb02 1.13 1.2715Apr02 1.31 1.2522Jul02 1.30 1.2328Oct02 1.46 1.6010Feb03 1.65 1.488Dec03 1.45 1.558Mar04 1.59 1.6514Jun04 1.66 1.7315Nov04 2.10 2.0921Mar05 2.20 2.1815Sep05 2.77 2.8409Feb06 2.56 2.64Source: Biodiesel prices, DOE.gov18
Demand Forecast. Table 3.4 below shows 2005 to 2015 projected consumption ofhighway diesel and B100 from soybeans and other feedstock. B100 demand is expectedto increase almost ninefold, rising from 75 million gallons in 2005 to 648 million gallonsby 2015. It is unlikely that the Great Lakes maritime industry will experience theseexplosive growth rates, but this is an indication of the expected acceptance of biodieselfuels.HighwayDieselUse /1(Bil gal)Table 3.4: U.S. Diesel Fuel and Biodiesel ForecastB100Volume(Milgal)BiodieselFromSoybeans(Pct)BiodieselFromSoybeans(Mil gal)BiodieselFrom otherFeedstocks(Mil gal)SoybeanOil Equiv /2(Mil lb)SoybeanEquiv /3(Mil Bu)2005 43.2 75.0 91.5% 68.6 6.4 51 462006 44.4 150.0 90.8% 136.1 13.9 1,021 922007 45.5 172.5 90.0% 15.3 17.3 1,164 1052008 46.4 215.6 89.3% 192.4 23.2 1,443 1302009 47.4 269.5 88.5% 238.5 31.0 1,789 1612010 48.4 323.4 87.8% 283.8 39.6 2,129 1912011 49.4 388.1 87.0% 337.7 50.5 2,533 2272012 50.2 465.8 86.3% 401.7 64.0 3,013 2702013 51.0 535.6 85.5% 457.9 77.7 3,435 3082014 51.6 589.2 84.8% 499.3 89.8 3,745 3362015 52.3 648.1 84.0% 544.4 103.7 4,083 367Source: Forecast prepared by LECG, LLC1. Annual Energy Outlook 2006. High Oil Price Case. Table 2.Converted from btu at 138,690 btu/gal2. Converted using 7.5 lb soybean oil = 1 gal biodiesel3. Assumes 11.1 lbs sbo/bu soybeans3.2.2 SupplyFollowing the data for soybean feedstock supply, we compare the Great Lakes states’ability to supply feedstock for biodiesel production of fuel for maritime commerce. The19962006 production level trend for soybean production and prices for the U.S. is shownbelow. In 2006 production topped 3 billion bushels.Table 3.5: U.S. Soybean Production and Price Trends 19962006Year Area Production (thousands of bushels) Price($ per bushel)1996 U.S. 2,380,274 $7.351997 U.S. 2,688,750 $6.471998 U.S 2,741,014 $4.931999 U.S 2,653,758 $4.632000 U.S 2,757,810 $4.542001 U.S 2,890,682 $4.382002 U.S 2,756,147 $5.532003 U.S 2,453,665 $7.342004 U.S 3,123,686 $5.742005 U.S 3,086,432 $5.502006 U.S 3,092,970Source: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service19
Page 3 and 4:
Mission StatementThe Great Lakes Ma
Page 5 and 6:
Technical Report Documentation1. Re
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTSOverview and Backg
Page 9 and 10:
Overview and Background:During Marc
Page 11 and 12:
Advisory Board:One of the first tas
Page 13 and 14:
University of MichiganDr. Armin Tro
Page 15 and 16:
Specific Project Awards to Universi
Page 17 and 18:
- October 8, 2005 GLMRI Affiliate U
Page 19 and 20:
- October 7, 2006 The 2 nd GLMRI Af
Page 21 and 22:
SeawaySized Bulk Carrier Model fo
Page 23 and 24:
Table of Contentspage1. Introductio
Page 25 and 26:
List of FigurespageFigure 2.1: Typi
Page 27 and 28:
2. BackgroundThe initial Sea Grant
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 2.2: Typical Forward Plenum
Page 31 and 32:
Table 3.1: BallastFree Bulk Carri
Page 33 and 34:
4. Model Construction ConstraintsTh
Page 35 and 36:
6. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CF
Page 37 and 38:
Figure 6.3: Velocity Vectors at the
Page 39 and 40:
8. Model ConstructionThe model of t
Page 41 and 42:
9. Potential Economic Impacts of th
Page 43:
Expanding Regional Freight Informat
Page 47 and 48:
___________________________________
Page 49 and 50:
Workshop participants also effectiv
Page 51 and 52:
information to share with governmen
Page 53 and 54:
Most of this information has been c
Page 55 and 56:
A New Perspective on Information De
Page 57 and 58:
• Assemble data and report inform
Page 59 and 60:
Looking Ahead: Next StepsThe main o
Page 61 and 62:
Again, according to MISNA, the mari
Page 63:
References Cited[1] Maritime Inform
Page 67:
Schematic Diagram of the Structure
Page 71 and 72:
Example 1: Basic Mapping FunctionsF
Page 73 and 74:
Figure B.7User now queries the port
Page 75 and 76:
Example 3: Mapping the NetworkFigur
Page 77:
APPENDIX CCode Specifications for G
Page 80 and 81:
Michigan: 01 Alpena 19 Marine C
Page 83:
APPENDIX DMeeting Participants in t
Page 86:
Tax Systems and Barriersto Great La
Page 89 and 90:
This page intentionally left blank.
Page 91 and 92:
The HMT Generates Substantially Mor
Page 93 and 94:
vii
Page 95 and 96:
paid by the now terminated Incan Su
Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 1: Introduction1.1 Research
Page 99 and 100:
presentation, “A Transportation I
Page 101 and 102:
− United States General Accountin
Page 103 and 104:
− Short Sea Vessel Service and Ha
Page 105 and 106:
Detailed views of these data presen
Page 107 and 108:
Guarantee Fee for MARAD'sTitle XI P
Page 109 and 110:
Table 2.4: Great Lakes Assessments
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Table 2.10: Duty Assessments on Gre
Page 117 and 118:
Certification Fee for Payment of Ve
Page 119 and 120:
6) HMT TablesAs noted above and in
Page 121 and 122:
Table 2.14: Total Bid Dollars by Co
Page 123 and 124:
2003 Arcadia Harbor, Mi $33,2462003
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 3: The U.S. Harbor Maintena
Page 127 and 128:
providing for - (1) revenue from im
Page 129 and 130:
Community’s RC. No panel has been
Page 131 and 132:
evenue to fund current and future h
Page 133 and 134:
The Support for Harbor Investment P
Page 135 and 136:
Table 3.3: Percent Change in U.S. F
Page 137 and 138:
Harbor Maintenance Tax Time Line198
Page 139 and 140:
Table 4.3: Output ImpactIndustry Di
Page 141 and 142:
ReferencesChapter 1[1] Stewart, Ric
Page 143 and 144:
[31] United States V. United States
Page 145 and 146:
[66] American Association of Port A
Page 147 and 148:
Appendix A: Tax Inventory DataSourc
Page 149 and 150:
Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
Page 151 and 152: Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
Page 153 and 154: Overview of Maritime Tax Inventory
Page 155 and 156: 31 U.S.C. 9701; P.L. 100-710, 46 C.
Page 157 and 158: Merchant Marine Act of 1936 as amen
Page 159 and 160: Reform Act of 1998, P. L. 105-258,
Page 161 and 162: Appendix C: Detailed HMT TimelineHA
Page 163 and 164: complete and refunds are issued.Imp
Page 165 and 166: There was unexpected good news for
Page 167 and 168: Articles... assembled abroad in who
Page 169 and 170: that each and every regulation is s
Page 171 and 172: Another challenge to the HMF as app
Page 173 and 174: Appendix D: Estimating Harbor Maint
Page 175 and 176: D-3
Page 177 and 178: Alternatives to Petroleum Based Fue
Page 179 and 180: Table of ContentsExecutive Summary
Page 181 and 182: Table 4.10:Great Lakes Biodiesel Pl
Page 183 and 184: of a longterm lowtemperature st
Page 185 and 186: Chapter 1: Overview1.1 Introduction
Page 187 and 188: Chapter 2: Biodiesel: An Alternativ
Page 189 and 190: 2.2.2 Properties of BiodieselThe pr
Page 191 and 192: e renewable fuels (e.g. ethanol and
Page 193 and 194: 2.4 Engine Test DataSummaries of th
Page 195 and 196: OEM manufacturer should be consulte
Page 197 and 198: A review of the literature addressi
Page 199 and 200: credit and a biodiesel mixture cred
Page 201: Figure 2: U.S. Diesel DemandMoving
Page 205 and 206: fuels (ethanol and biodiesel) be us
Page 207 and 208: Minnesota incentivesTable 3.11: Min
Page 209 and 210: Figure 3: Glycerin as Market RiskSo
Page 211 and 212: Figure 4: Great Lakes Region IMPLAN
Page 213 and 214: Definitions used in this report:Mea
Page 215 and 216: column shows that in Year 1 of cons
Page 217 and 218: Operations. Tables below show the e
Page 219 and 220: When operations for the biodiesel p
Page 221 and 222: verify that separation of the blend
Page 223 and 224: was considered the hot topic, very
Page 225 and 226: ReferencesChapter 1No referencesCha
Page 227 and 228: http://www.irs.gov/publications/p37
Page 229 and 230: Appendix A: Demand and Supply Suppo
Page 231 and 232: Table A2: Minnesota Soybean Produ
Page 233 and 234: Table A6: Marine Diesel Sales, Co
Page 236: Table of ContentsSections Page #1.
Page 239 and 240: 2. Introduction: Background and Obj
Page 241 and 242: 3. MethodsThe LLO has a surveygra
Page 243 and 244: Figure 2. Sidescan sonar mosaic of
Page 245 and 246: Figure 4. Single track (detailed) s
Page 247 and 248: Figure 7. Single track (detailed) s
Page 249 and 250: Figure 10. Detailed multibeam bathy
Page 251 and 252: 5. Potential Economic Impacts of th
Page 253 and 254:
Final Report: Great Lakes Maritime
Page 255 and 256:
Evaluation Measures and ResultsTo e
Page 257 and 258:
Appendix ASummary of Publicity & Re
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix BGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
Page 261 and 262:
Appendix DGreat Lakes Maritime Tran
Page 263 and 264:
REFERENCESDuluth Port Authority. 20
Page 265 and 266:
Steel Starts Here (12:00 minutes) b
Page 267 and 268:
Appendix FGreat Lakes Shipping: Did
Page 269 and 270:
15. What are the top 3 products shi
Page 271 and 272:
Properly Loaded Ship Listing ShipHO
Page 273 and 274:
FoghornGreenhouse gasGroundedHarbor
show all

15 MB - Great Lakes Maritime Research Institute

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?