to avoid binaristic traps, rejecting on <strong>the</strong> one hand a non-innocent nostalgicreturn to some bygone, fictionalized pre-technological moment while refusingto swallow whole market-driven, teleological tropes of technology’s inevitableability to deliver and equitably mete out social justice, we appear to departmost notably from second <strong>wave</strong> instructors in <strong>the</strong> un spoken, though requisitenecessity to be able to translate such knowledge into pedagogic practice intwenty-first century classroom spaces. 13 Put ano<strong>the</strong>r way, <strong>the</strong> choices thatwere second <strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> to make, “to blog or not to blog,” to remain,for a portion of <strong>the</strong>ir careers anyway, outside <strong>the</strong> purview and surveillance ofstudents’ Google searches, to refrain from keeping tabs on <strong>the</strong> most recentviral incarnation to come out of You Tube, or to ignore incipient techno-mediaflavors of <strong>the</strong> month, no longer seems feasible for <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> feminist instructors,particularly if integrating students’ intellectual learning <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir personalexperiences remains at <strong>the</strong> fore of <strong>the</strong> <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> intellectual and activist project.If consciousness is, as Braidotti observes, “about co-synchronicity: shared timezones, shared memories, and share-able time-lines of projects,” <strong>the</strong>n <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong>feminist pedagogic practice requires that we think between and across our aswell as our students’ techno-mediated, multiple screen locations in findingmindfully intelligible, meaningfully synchronized means of affinity and modesof knowledge transfer. This may mean, for example, asking questions we maynot be typically accustomed to asking our students. Practical questions such aslearning more about and excavating in greater depth <strong>the</strong> websites our studentsregularly visit, asking how <strong>the</strong>y search, ga<strong>the</strong>r, disseminate and make sense of<strong>the</strong> visual and informatic content <strong>the</strong>y are daily exposed to, and investigatingwhat <strong>the</strong>ir techno-media consumer habits consist of, and how <strong>the</strong>y negotiatein-vivo, corporeal interactions <strong>with</strong> fellow students and instructors juxtaposedto more distanced e-learning environments.These questions, along <strong>with</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs, may assist <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> instrategizing how best to bring media and technology into <strong>the</strong> dynamic realm ofteaching gender in a European landscape. Such questions also set <strong>the</strong> stage forenvisaging ways in which second and <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> might collaboratein cross-generational discussions and research about how to teach gender whileutilizing <strong>new</strong> media and technology. If, for example, e-learning “provides <strong>new</strong>possibilities for challenging <strong>the</strong> de facto hierarchy of students and teachers,”13Nina Lykke and Rosi Braidotti, “Postface,” in Between Monsters, Goddesses, and Cyborgs: Feminist Confrontations<strong>with</strong> Science, Medicine, and Cyberspace, eds. Nina Lykke and Rosi Braidotti (London: Zed Books, 1996); DonnaHaraway; Rosi Braidotti, Transpositions.106
perhaps organizing workshops wherein <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> demonstrativelyshowcase <strong>the</strong>ir techno-practices to second <strong>wave</strong> mentors, may likewise shiftand reroute <strong>the</strong> methods by which knowledge about teaching and technologyare transferred 14Implications for <strong>Teaching</strong>In this short chapter, I have endeavored to flesh out some looming questionsand personal reflections regarding <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong>’ navigation and integrationof technology and media into <strong>the</strong>ir feminist classrooms. From this<strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> feminist’s perspective, it does not seem feasible or productive todefinitively strike all things technological or media oriented from <strong>the</strong> pedagogicrecord of teaching gender, though an equal mix of mindfulness and creativity arecertainly welcome. Here Braidotti’s prescriptive diagnosis is useful. She finds,“The merger of <strong>the</strong> human <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> technological, or <strong>the</strong> machine-like, notunlike <strong>the</strong> symbiotic relationship between <strong>the</strong> animal and its habitat, results ina <strong>new</strong> compound, a <strong>new</strong> kind of unity…it marks <strong>the</strong> highlight of radical imminence– an ethics of interdependence.” 15 Braidotti’s notion of <strong>the</strong> <strong>new</strong>-foundunity wrought by human/non-human interface bears resemblance to <strong>the</strong> kindof techno-mindfulness I am suggesting, whereby mindfulness acts as a sort ofconnective tissue linking <strong>the</strong> technological <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> corporeal <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> express,though non-deterministic purpose of enmeshing students, instructors, andmachines alike in a more creative, techno-mediated classroom space. Mindfulpedagogic practice might entail a re-constituting of what we talk about <strong>with</strong>students when we talk about media and technology and a conscious re-orientationand re-imagining about how to engage <strong>with</strong> technologies and media thathave o<strong>the</strong>rwise been shored up outside <strong>the</strong> bounds of <strong>the</strong> feminist classroom for<strong>the</strong> purposes of de-politicized consumption. In conclusion, <strong>third</strong> <strong>wave</strong> feministinstructors have an exciting opportunity to think about how to syncreticallyenfold technology and media into <strong>the</strong>ir pedagogic toolboxes and reinvent <strong>the</strong>tools requisite for teaching gender in a European landscape.14Enikö Demény, Clare Hemmings, Ulla Holm, Päivi Korvajärvi, Theodossia-Soula Pavlidou, and Veronica Vesterling;Mervi Heikkinen, Suvi Pihkala, and Vappu Sunnari. “Constructing a pedagogical approach for an e-learningprogramme on gender and sexual violence” (paper presented at conference From Violence to Caring: Gendered andSexualised Violence as Challenge on <strong>the</strong> Life-Span, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland, December 4-5, 2008).15Rosi Braidotti, Metamorphoses: Towards a Materialist Theory of Becoming, 225-226.107
- Page 1:
Teaching with the Third WaveNew Fem
- Page 4 and 5:
© Åse Bengtsson and Catti Brandel
- Page 6 and 7:
“This Is Not Therapy!” 75Un/Exp
- Page 9 and 10:
PrefaceThe idea of writing this boo
- Page 11 and 12:
IntroductionDaniela Gronold, Brigit
- Page 13 and 14:
Brandelius who is portrayed on the
- Page 15 and 16:
The institutional context of Women
- Page 17:
The chapters present new feminist e
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionSecond-wave feminism is
- Page 22 and 23:
Second-Wave Feminist Generationalit
- Page 24 and 25:
and conflictual ones), and since th
- Page 26 and 27:
This allows her to conceptualize a
- Page 28 and 29:
The Anglo-American and the French t
- Page 30 and 31:
To traverse the classifications of
- Page 32 and 33:
ing system without a General and wi
- Page 34 and 35:
Let me end this chapter by providin
- Page 36 and 37:
Buikema tells the story of Sarah Ba
- Page 38 and 39:
Roof, Judith. “Generational Diffi
- Page 40 and 41:
postmodern capitalism and the impli
- Page 42 and 43:
European scope and its neoliberal c
- Page 44 and 45:
front. A strong motivation offered
- Page 46 and 47:
In her editorial response to Hemmin
- Page 48 and 49:
Gender Studies’, 28 I agree with
- Page 50 and 51:
expected to play a central role as
- Page 52 and 53:
Implications for teaching gender: d
- Page 54 and 55:
These re- appropriations cannot be
- Page 56 and 57:
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Fle
- Page 58 and 59: We are both white scholars who grew
- Page 60 and 61: mapped in the first part of project
- Page 62 and 63: able much earlier; therefore the pe
- Page 64 and 65: Using the example of Germany Wollra
- Page 66 and 67: of a link to already existing stere
- Page 68 and 69: The alien’s green colour tells of
- Page 70 and 71: Implications of teaching Critical W
- Page 72 and 73: ness to people with different backg
- Page 74 and 75: theories. This concept can be fruit
- Page 76 and 77: Räthzel, Nora. “Nationalism and
- Page 78 and 79: nism’ in the classroom. Thus, whi
- Page 80 and 81: As a method, memory work focuses on
- Page 82 and 83: ence on the teaching. This was beca
- Page 84 and 85: when we wanted them to do memory wo
- Page 86 and 87: in the consciousness-raising groups
- Page 88 and 89: as a therapeutic method, they not o
- Page 90 and 91: “Empowerment has, however, someti
- Page 92 and 93: fascination with the strong commona
- Page 94 and 95: practice”. 43 She explains MacKin
- Page 96 and 97: has been exposed to subjection by o
- Page 98 and 99: Sebastien, Amanda. “Tendencies in
- Page 100 and 101: a historical moment when technologi
- Page 102 and 103: As earlier noted, there are certain
- Page 104 and 105: new per se, they like Internet-base
- Page 106 and 107: where technological and media accou
- Page 110 and 111: ReferencesBraidotti, Rosi. Metamorp
- Page 112 and 113: IntroductionIn 2007, with two other
- Page 114 and 115: WoMen at workIn all, it took us alm
- Page 116 and 117: Facing Uncertainties and Self-quest
- Page 118 and 119: Doctorate degree’s curricula for
- Page 120 and 121: In addition, many feminist academic
- Page 122 and 123: and duties which are seen as comple
- Page 124 and 125: answers adapted to their own profes
- Page 126 and 127: As the form of the message counts a
- Page 128 and 129: ReferencesBlanchard, Soline, Jules
- Page 130 and 131: As the learning outcomes demonstrat
- Page 132 and 133: Within the organizational structure
- Page 134 and 135: Gender-sensitive didactics can be p
- Page 136 and 137: A further dimension is knowledge ab
- Page 138 and 139: Teaching materialsSince language is
- Page 140 and 141: and absences, both short term and p
- Page 142 and 143: The cliché cloakroomSometimes it w
- Page 144 and 145: and goatees, later almost all wante
- Page 146 and 147: Presentations from the working grou
- Page 148 and 149: ConclusionTeachers’ self-reflecti
- Page 150 and 151: Mühlen Achs, Gitta. Geschlecht bew
- Page 152: Milka Metso, PhD Candidate, Univers