13.07.2015 Views

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Second-Wave Feminist Generationality:Patriarchal and Anti-Patriarchal ConceptualizationsThe conceptualization of generationality that is featured in most (feminist)socio-political and <strong>the</strong>oretical imaginaries has two characteristics. First of all,generationality in analyses and understandings, such as Roof’s, involvessequential negation. This is <strong>the</strong> well-known phenomenon that a <strong>new</strong>er generationis always already dualistically opposed to a previous one. Post- <strong>feminists</strong> suchas Katie Roiphe from <strong>the</strong> U.S., and Malou van Hintum and Sanderijn Cels,who are from <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, as I am, famously argued in <strong>the</strong> 1990s againstsecond-<strong>wave</strong> feminism in a manner that sets up a dualism between <strong>the</strong> twogenerations. This dualism allows for reductionist thought only; second-<strong>wave</strong>feminist <strong>the</strong>ory becomes limited to sex-negativity, for instance, whereas <strong>the</strong>actual ‘sex wars’ of <strong>the</strong> 1980s entailed a battle between sex-negative and sexpositivefeminist <strong>the</strong>ories.Secondly, <strong>the</strong> generationality involved is set up as narrative of progress.According to a generationality that is teleologically structured, a <strong>new</strong>er generationis always already positioned as better than a previous one. This teleologicalelement is to be found in post-feminist argumentation (when sex-positivenessis said to have been ‘finally’ discovered in <strong>the</strong> late 1990s), but it is also a featureof <strong>the</strong> second <strong>wave</strong>. Second-<strong>wave</strong> feminism positioned itself vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> ‘morerudimentary’ first <strong>wave</strong> and claimed <strong>the</strong>oretical sophistication by constructingdifference feminism as well as deconstructive feminism as moves beyond <strong>the</strong>equality feminism ascribed to <strong>the</strong> first <strong>wave</strong>. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> conceptualizationof generation implies a classificatory practice. Generations are <strong>the</strong>refor us to classify, that is, to select and list. The fact that generalizations areinvolved goes unrecognized; even <strong>the</strong> first <strong>wave</strong> was more complex than hereconstructed.This classificatory practice as implied by <strong>the</strong> methodology of second<strong>wave</strong>feminist and post-feminist generationality is a practice that is predicatedon referentiality as well as negativity. Referentiality means that generationalityis conceptualized in accordance <strong>with</strong> a notion of age groups. Generations arecohorts of persons, or, in this case, women born in a predetermined period oftime. This is to say that I can never be a second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist, because I donot belong to <strong>the</strong> generation of baby boomers. I was born in 1978, and consequently,I am a member of <strong>the</strong> post-feminist generation. Negativity means20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!