Second-Wave Feminist Generationality:Patriarchal and Anti-Patriarchal ConceptualizationsThe conceptualization of generationality that is featured in most (feminist)socio-political and <strong>the</strong>oretical imaginaries has two characteristics. First of all,generationality in analyses and understandings, such as Roof’s, involvessequential negation. This is <strong>the</strong> well-known phenomenon that a <strong>new</strong>er generationis always already dualistically opposed to a previous one. Post- <strong>feminists</strong> suchas Katie Roiphe from <strong>the</strong> U.S., and Malou van Hintum and Sanderijn Cels,who are from <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands, as I am, famously argued in <strong>the</strong> 1990s againstsecond-<strong>wave</strong> feminism in a manner that sets up a dualism between <strong>the</strong> twogenerations. This dualism allows for reductionist thought only; second-<strong>wave</strong>feminist <strong>the</strong>ory becomes limited to sex-negativity, for instance, whereas <strong>the</strong>actual ‘sex wars’ of <strong>the</strong> 1980s entailed a battle between sex-negative and sexpositivefeminist <strong>the</strong>ories.Secondly, <strong>the</strong> generationality involved is set up as narrative of progress.According to a generationality that is teleologically structured, a <strong>new</strong>er generationis always already positioned as better than a previous one. This teleologicalelement is to be found in post-feminist argumentation (when sex-positivenessis said to have been ‘finally’ discovered in <strong>the</strong> late 1990s), but it is also a featureof <strong>the</strong> second <strong>wave</strong>. Second-<strong>wave</strong> feminism positioned itself vis-à-vis <strong>the</strong> ‘morerudimentary’ first <strong>wave</strong> and claimed <strong>the</strong>oretical sophistication by constructingdifference feminism as well as deconstructive feminism as moves beyond <strong>the</strong>equality feminism ascribed to <strong>the</strong> first <strong>wave</strong>. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, <strong>the</strong> conceptualizationof generation implies a classificatory practice. Generations are <strong>the</strong>refor us to classify, that is, to select and list. The fact that generalizations areinvolved goes unrecognized; even <strong>the</strong> first <strong>wave</strong> was more complex than hereconstructed.This classificatory practice as implied by <strong>the</strong> methodology of second<strong>wave</strong>feminist and post-feminist generationality is a practice that is predicatedon referentiality as well as negativity. Referentiality means that generationalityis conceptualized in accordance <strong>with</strong> a notion of age groups. Generations arecohorts of persons, or, in this case, women born in a predetermined period oftime. This is to say that I can never be a second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist, because I donot belong to <strong>the</strong> generation of baby boomers. I was born in 1978, and consequently,I am a member of <strong>the</strong> post-feminist generation. Negativity means20
that <strong>the</strong> relations between generations-as-classes are per definition structuredby conflict or competition. The ‘post-’ of post-feminism should be read as a‘beyond.’I agree <strong>with</strong> Roof who understands <strong>the</strong> traditional conceptualization of(feminist) generationality as a detrimental classificatory generationality thatlures women back into Oedipality, that is, predetermined gender roles. Thisis unfortunate since Oedipal relations are not exhaustive of relations betweenwomen, and more importantly even, referential Oedipality itself needs to belooked at very carefully. Contrary to Roof, however, I intend to acknowledgethat feminist <strong>the</strong>ory itself, beginning <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ories coming out of<strong>the</strong> second <strong>wave</strong>, not only works <strong>with</strong> such a conceptualization, but has alsolaid bare its problems. 5 Second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ory, as I will show below, hascharacterized <strong>the</strong> classificatory notion of generationality as patriarchal. Thuswhen <strong>third</strong>-<strong>wave</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ory criticizes <strong>the</strong> concept of generationality, itworks <strong>with</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than against second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ory in a continuous,yet partial, that is cartographical way. Before I go into this, let me explain howsecond-<strong>wave</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ory began to shift Oedipal generationality as early asin <strong>the</strong> 1970s.Gayle Rubin and Adrienne Rich are among <strong>the</strong> founding mo<strong>the</strong>rs of <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>ory of patriarchy. The former’s ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on <strong>the</strong> ‘PoliticalEconomy’ of Sex’ from 1975 discusses <strong>the</strong> parameters of patriarchy by employingClaude Lévi-Strauss’ notion of <strong>the</strong> exchange of women in <strong>the</strong> feministcause. In doing so, she construes an early feminist <strong>the</strong>ory of patriarchy, andof <strong>the</strong> patriarchal interest in securing Oedipal relations. Rubin claimed: “Ifit is women who are being transacted, <strong>the</strong>n it is <strong>the</strong> men who give and take<strong>the</strong>m who are linked, <strong>the</strong> woman being a conduit of a relationship ra<strong>the</strong>r thana partner to it. (…) The relations of such a system are such that women arein no position to realize <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong>ir own circulation. As long as <strong>the</strong>relations specify that men exchange women, it is men who are beneficiaries of<strong>the</strong> product of such exchanges (…).” 6 As Rubin makes clear, feminist scrutinyexposes <strong>the</strong> circulation of women through <strong>the</strong> hands of men as patriarchaland unbeneficial for women. Women are as it were fenced in by <strong>the</strong> kinshipsystem; <strong>the</strong>y have no affirmative relations to o<strong>the</strong>r women (only competitive5A similar evaluation of <strong>the</strong> work of Roof is presented in Astrid Henry, Not My Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Sister: Generational Conflictand Third-Wave Feminism (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2004), 183.6Gayle Rubin, “The Traffic in Women: Notes on <strong>the</strong> ‘Political Economy’ of Sex,” in Toward an Anthropology ofWomen, ed. Rayna R. Reiter (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975), 174.21
- Page 1: Teaching with the Third WaveNew Fem
- Page 4 and 5: © Åse Bengtsson and Catti Brandel
- Page 6 and 7: “This Is Not Therapy!” 75Un/Exp
- Page 9 and 10: PrefaceThe idea of writing this boo
- Page 11 and 12: IntroductionDaniela Gronold, Brigit
- Page 13 and 14: Brandelius who is portrayed on the
- Page 15 and 16: The institutional context of Women
- Page 17: The chapters present new feminist e
- Page 20 and 21: IntroductionSecond-wave feminism is
- Page 24 and 25: and conflictual ones), and since th
- Page 26 and 27: This allows her to conceptualize a
- Page 28 and 29: The Anglo-American and the French t
- Page 30 and 31: To traverse the classifications of
- Page 32 and 33: ing system without a General and wi
- Page 34 and 35: Let me end this chapter by providin
- Page 36 and 37: Buikema tells the story of Sarah Ba
- Page 38 and 39: Roof, Judith. “Generational Diffi
- Page 40 and 41: postmodern capitalism and the impli
- Page 42 and 43: European scope and its neoliberal c
- Page 44 and 45: front. A strong motivation offered
- Page 46 and 47: In her editorial response to Hemmin
- Page 48 and 49: Gender Studies’, 28 I agree with
- Page 50 and 51: expected to play a central role as
- Page 52 and 53: Implications for teaching gender: d
- Page 54 and 55: These re- appropriations cannot be
- Page 56 and 57: Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Fle
- Page 58 and 59: We are both white scholars who grew
- Page 60 and 61: mapped in the first part of project
- Page 62 and 63: able much earlier; therefore the pe
- Page 64 and 65: Using the example of Germany Wollra
- Page 66 and 67: of a link to already existing stere
- Page 68 and 69: The alien’s green colour tells of
- Page 70 and 71: Implications of teaching Critical W
- Page 72 and 73:
ness to people with different backg
- Page 74 and 75:
theories. This concept can be fruit
- Page 76 and 77:
Räthzel, Nora. “Nationalism and
- Page 78 and 79:
nism’ in the classroom. Thus, whi
- Page 80 and 81:
As a method, memory work focuses on
- Page 82 and 83:
ence on the teaching. This was beca
- Page 84 and 85:
when we wanted them to do memory wo
- Page 86 and 87:
in the consciousness-raising groups
- Page 88 and 89:
as a therapeutic method, they not o
- Page 90 and 91:
“Empowerment has, however, someti
- Page 92 and 93:
fascination with the strong commona
- Page 94 and 95:
practice”. 43 She explains MacKin
- Page 96 and 97:
has been exposed to subjection by o
- Page 98 and 99:
Sebastien, Amanda. “Tendencies in
- Page 100 and 101:
a historical moment when technologi
- Page 102 and 103:
As earlier noted, there are certain
- Page 104 and 105:
new per se, they like Internet-base
- Page 106 and 107:
where technological and media accou
- Page 108 and 109:
to avoid binaristic traps, rejectin
- Page 110 and 111:
ReferencesBraidotti, Rosi. Metamorp
- Page 112 and 113:
IntroductionIn 2007, with two other
- Page 114 and 115:
WoMen at workIn all, it took us alm
- Page 116 and 117:
Facing Uncertainties and Self-quest
- Page 118 and 119:
Doctorate degree’s curricula for
- Page 120 and 121:
In addition, many feminist academic
- Page 122 and 123:
and duties which are seen as comple
- Page 124 and 125:
answers adapted to their own profes
- Page 126 and 127:
As the form of the message counts a
- Page 128 and 129:
ReferencesBlanchard, Soline, Jules
- Page 130 and 131:
As the learning outcomes demonstrat
- Page 132 and 133:
Within the organizational structure
- Page 134 and 135:
Gender-sensitive didactics can be p
- Page 136 and 137:
A further dimension is knowledge ab
- Page 138 and 139:
Teaching materialsSince language is
- Page 140 and 141:
and absences, both short term and p
- Page 142 and 143:
The cliché cloakroomSometimes it w
- Page 144 and 145:
and goatees, later almost all wante
- Page 146 and 147:
Presentations from the working grou
- Page 148 and 149:
ConclusionTeachers’ self-reflecti
- Page 150 and 151:
Mühlen Achs, Gitta. Geschlecht bew
- Page 152:
Milka Metso, PhD Candidate, Univers