13.07.2015 Views

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

Teaching with the third wave new feminists - MailChimp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

plicitly address this narrative in order to be able to traverse through and beyondnotions of feminism in <strong>the</strong> classroom. Since <strong>the</strong> argument in this chapter takesits departure in a workshop where we used memory work, I will start <strong>with</strong> ashort introduction to <strong>the</strong> methodology of memory work.Introducing memory work: a method aimed at studying how we become<strong>the</strong> persons we areMemory work is a feminist method and methodology introduced by a group ofacademic <strong>feminists</strong> in Germany, in <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 1970s. 5 The first publishedvolume in English on memory work is entitled Female Sexualization, and was<strong>the</strong> second volume on memory work published by <strong>the</strong> collective of authors. 6Memory work, as it is explained by Haug et al., is a visualization of howexperience interacts <strong>with</strong> social context and how it is always embedded inparticular situations, relations and structures. The method is based on autobiographicalstories, where <strong>the</strong> research collective’s own personal memoriesconstitute <strong>the</strong> material to be collectively analysed.While <strong>the</strong> poststructuralist critique asserts that <strong>the</strong>re is no experiencethat is not already discursively constructed, <strong>the</strong> memory work collective alsoacknowledges a similar kind of anti-essentialism. This however is not at allfocused on <strong>the</strong> fractions that are characteristic for poststructuralists, but onmatter and materiality and is engaged in a study of <strong>the</strong> effects on women’ssocialization of colonized discourses, structures and relations. 7 To this groupof scholars, any attempt to fix femininity – irrespective if <strong>the</strong> aim was to lockfemininity in, or if it was to rescue femininity – was problematic. Indeed, every“naturalistic and ahistorical conception in which <strong>the</strong> body appears as <strong>the</strong> guardianof femininity’s ultimate truths” was rejected by this collective of scholars. 85Frigga Haug et al. Female sexualization. A Collective Work of Memory, (London: Verso, 1987), 33-72.6The German title of <strong>the</strong> book is Frauenformen. Alltagsgeschichten und Entwurf einer Theorie weiblicherSozialisation, ed. Frigga Haug 1980, and it is published at AS 45, Berlin/W. Recently, Frigga Haug has publisheda short article titled “Memory work”, see Australian Feminist Studies (2008), 23:58, 537-541, and published <strong>the</strong>chapter “Memory work: A detailed rendering of <strong>the</strong> method for social science research,” in <strong>the</strong> volume Dissecting <strong>the</strong>mundane: International perspectives on memory-work, ed. Adrienne E. Hyle et al., (MD: University Press of America2008).7Frigga Haug, “Memory Work”, in Female sexualization. A Collective Work of Memory, ed. Frigga Haug et. al. (London:Verso, 1987), 54.8Erica Carter, “Translators foreword”, in Female sexualization. A Collective Work of Memory ed. Haug et. al (London:Verso, 1987), 13.77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!