As <strong>the</strong> learning outcomes demonstrate, this model of integrating <strong>the</strong>oretical knowledge<strong>with</strong> experienced-based learning scenarios appears to be quite successful.IntroductionIn our chapter, we seek to document and evaluate <strong>the</strong> continuing educationmethod for teacher training we developed and subsequently tested in a workshopin January 2008. This workshop on gender-sensitive education took placein <strong>the</strong> context of voluntary continuing education programs for grammar schoolteachers in Austria. In <strong>the</strong> course of this article, we evaluate <strong>the</strong> concept anddescription of <strong>the</strong> workshop, <strong>the</strong> written and oral feedback from <strong>the</strong> participants,<strong>the</strong>ir reflections regarding us as leaders of <strong>the</strong> workshop. It is importantfor us to work out which contextual contributions and methods used <strong>with</strong>in<strong>the</strong> workshop were important for <strong>the</strong> participants, which discussions were particularlyfruitful and which were less effective.As authors our interest lies <strong>with</strong>in <strong>the</strong> evaluation of this continuing educationprogram, so that <strong>the</strong> concept of gender-sensitive teaching can be fur<strong>the</strong>rdeveloped by teachers as <strong>the</strong>y apply this method in <strong>the</strong>ir schools.The aim of <strong>the</strong> workshop was to impart some basic, <strong>the</strong>oretical backgroundknowledge of gender-sensitive didactics and to give more life to this<strong>the</strong>oretical information through reflection, testing, and practice. The focus wason visualizing alternative identities, presenting methods for dealing <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong>topic of “gender” in classrooms, and testing <strong>the</strong> methods. The goal was forteachers to use <strong>the</strong> experience to reflect on <strong>the</strong>ir own self-perception and torecognize <strong>the</strong>ir own prejudices and categorizations.This article is an attempt to reflect on <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical ideas that wereput into practice at <strong>the</strong> workshop as well as <strong>the</strong> results of this way of teaching<strong>the</strong>ory. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we seek to provide readers of this text <strong>with</strong> our results fortesting, adjusting and amending <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ories based on our experiences.In <strong>the</strong> first section below, we place our workshop <strong>with</strong>in <strong>the</strong> contextof continuing education of Austrian grammar school teachers. Section twocontains a description of <strong>the</strong> concept and <strong>the</strong> schedule of <strong>the</strong> workshop.Section three describes what <strong>the</strong> participants could learn. Here we present<strong>the</strong> content we aimed to impart, namely: gender-sensitive teaching and itsaspects concerning access and framework conditions, curriculum, and teachingmethods. In section four, we describe how <strong>the</strong> participants could learn128
through reflection, by dismantling clichés and body language, by sharing <strong>the</strong>irexperiences, in <strong>the</strong> “gender factory”, and by practicing exercises that could beused in <strong>the</strong>ir own classrooms.In <strong>the</strong> concluding section, we outline <strong>the</strong> participants’ learning outcomesas <strong>the</strong>y were presented at <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> workshop.BackgroundThe Austrian school system is organized hierarchically: <strong>the</strong> head of school,heads of departments, academic coordinators (for each subject area),KustodInnen (responsible for <strong>the</strong> provision of appropriate teaching resourcesfor <strong>the</strong> respective subject), administrators, and KlassenvorstaendInnen(similar to homeroom teachers; however, in Austria, teachers in this positionare responsible for an entire class and may have more administrative dutiesthan <strong>the</strong> average homeroom teacher in <strong>the</strong> American system). Various teacherstake on <strong>the</strong> additional responsibilities of <strong>the</strong>se positions. Team meetings andcoordination meetings are convened to plan daily school and teaching lifeas well as <strong>the</strong> continuing education of teachers. Teachers are encouraged totake active part in activities <strong>with</strong>in <strong>the</strong>ir schools, make use of <strong>the</strong>ir continuingeducation days, attend seminars and workshops, share <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>new</strong>ly gainedknowledge <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir colleagues, and to implement it in <strong>the</strong>ir teaching (see:www.schule.at).In Austria, <strong>the</strong> Ministry for Education, Science and Culture (Bundesministeriumfür Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, abbreviated as “bmbwk”)organizes continuing education for grammar school teachers. Specializedprograms were previously offered by “Pedagogic Academies” (PädagogischeInstitute and Pädagogische Akademien). 2 Over <strong>the</strong> last ten years, <strong>the</strong>seinstitutions have been continually reorganized and <strong>the</strong> training and continuingeducation of teachers is currently offered by “Pedagogic Universities” (<strong>the</strong>former Pedagogic Academies). This means that all <strong>the</strong> training for teachersworking in compulsory education takes place at <strong>the</strong> university level. The basisfor this development is set by <strong>the</strong> <strong>new</strong> Academies Study Act (Akademien-Studiengesetz) of 1999.2bmbwk – Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur, ed., Bildungsentwicklung in Österreich(Wien: 2004), 59. http://www.bmukk.gv.at/medienpool/11759/bildungsentw_de.pdf (last accessed: 4 September2009); link to <strong>the</strong> Federal Ministry: http://www.bmukk.gv.at/schulen/lehr/index.xml (last accessed: 4 September2009).129
- Page 1:
Teaching with the Third WaveNew Fem
- Page 4 and 5:
© Åse Bengtsson and Catti Brandel
- Page 6 and 7:
“This Is Not Therapy!” 75Un/Exp
- Page 9 and 10:
PrefaceThe idea of writing this boo
- Page 11 and 12:
IntroductionDaniela Gronold, Brigit
- Page 13 and 14:
Brandelius who is portrayed on the
- Page 15 and 16:
The institutional context of Women
- Page 17:
The chapters present new feminist e
- Page 20 and 21:
IntroductionSecond-wave feminism is
- Page 22 and 23:
Second-Wave Feminist Generationalit
- Page 24 and 25:
and conflictual ones), and since th
- Page 26 and 27:
This allows her to conceptualize a
- Page 28 and 29:
The Anglo-American and the French t
- Page 30 and 31:
To traverse the classifications of
- Page 32 and 33:
ing system without a General and wi
- Page 34 and 35:
Let me end this chapter by providin
- Page 36 and 37:
Buikema tells the story of Sarah Ba
- Page 38 and 39:
Roof, Judith. “Generational Diffi
- Page 40 and 41:
postmodern capitalism and the impli
- Page 42 and 43:
European scope and its neoliberal c
- Page 44 and 45:
front. A strong motivation offered
- Page 46 and 47:
In her editorial response to Hemmin
- Page 48 and 49:
Gender Studies’, 28 I agree with
- Page 50 and 51:
expected to play a central role as
- Page 52 and 53:
Implications for teaching gender: d
- Page 54 and 55:
These re- appropriations cannot be
- Page 56 and 57:
Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Fle
- Page 58 and 59:
We are both white scholars who grew
- Page 60 and 61:
mapped in the first part of project
- Page 62 and 63:
able much earlier; therefore the pe
- Page 64 and 65:
Using the example of Germany Wollra
- Page 66 and 67:
of a link to already existing stere
- Page 68 and 69:
The alien’s green colour tells of
- Page 70 and 71:
Implications of teaching Critical W
- Page 72 and 73:
ness to people with different backg
- Page 74 and 75:
theories. This concept can be fruit
- Page 76 and 77:
Räthzel, Nora. “Nationalism and
- Page 78 and 79:
nism’ in the classroom. Thus, whi
- Page 80 and 81: As a method, memory work focuses on
- Page 82 and 83: ence on the teaching. This was beca
- Page 84 and 85: when we wanted them to do memory wo
- Page 86 and 87: in the consciousness-raising groups
- Page 88 and 89: as a therapeutic method, they not o
- Page 90 and 91: “Empowerment has, however, someti
- Page 92 and 93: fascination with the strong commona
- Page 94 and 95: practice”. 43 She explains MacKin
- Page 96 and 97: has been exposed to subjection by o
- Page 98 and 99: Sebastien, Amanda. “Tendencies in
- Page 100 and 101: a historical moment when technologi
- Page 102 and 103: As earlier noted, there are certain
- Page 104 and 105: new per se, they like Internet-base
- Page 106 and 107: where technological and media accou
- Page 108 and 109: to avoid binaristic traps, rejectin
- Page 110 and 111: ReferencesBraidotti, Rosi. Metamorp
- Page 112 and 113: IntroductionIn 2007, with two other
- Page 114 and 115: WoMen at workIn all, it took us alm
- Page 116 and 117: Facing Uncertainties and Self-quest
- Page 118 and 119: Doctorate degree’s curricula for
- Page 120 and 121: In addition, many feminist academic
- Page 122 and 123: and duties which are seen as comple
- Page 124 and 125: answers adapted to their own profes
- Page 126 and 127: As the form of the message counts a
- Page 128 and 129: ReferencesBlanchard, Soline, Jules
- Page 132 and 133: Within the organizational structure
- Page 134 and 135: Gender-sensitive didactics can be p
- Page 136 and 137: A further dimension is knowledge ab
- Page 138 and 139: Teaching materialsSince language is
- Page 140 and 141: and absences, both short term and p
- Page 142 and 143: The cliché cloakroomSometimes it w
- Page 144 and 145: and goatees, later almost all wante
- Page 146 and 147: Presentations from the working grou
- Page 148 and 149: ConclusionTeachers’ self-reflecti
- Page 150 and 151: Mühlen Achs, Gitta. Geschlecht bew
- Page 152: Milka Metso, PhD Candidate, Univers