This allows her to conceptualize a feminist generationality that is affirmativeinstead of negative. In addition, by bringing in cartography, feminism can alsoshift <strong>the</strong> referentiality of <strong>the</strong> negative concept of generation: cartographicallyor diagrammatically grouping <strong>feminists</strong> allows us to abandoning generationsas predetermined age groups. It allows for <strong>the</strong> constitution of links between<strong>feminists</strong> on <strong>the</strong> basis of what <strong>the</strong>ir work does or allows us to do. The workis no longer seen as merely referential, that is, treated in a representationalistmanner; allowing for taking into consideration what <strong>the</strong> work does allows usto move beyond where <strong>the</strong> work comes from, and what it, consequentially,is assumed to do. Cutting across age groups, a feminism of sexual difference,constrained by a focus on women, is indeterminate in its outcomes. 14 I mightproduce a text, give a lecture, or analyse a lecture by one of my own teachersin 2009 that does what a second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist text, analysis, or lecture wassupposed to do in <strong>the</strong> 1970s. A second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist claim might be <strong>third</strong><strong>wave</strong>in that it does not work <strong>with</strong> sequential negation and progress narrative.And so on. Allowing for this by moving away from a classificatory logic, I wantto claim, a generationality is constructed that is generative of feminist <strong>the</strong>ories,methodologies, and insights, not always already generated in a referential anddualist sense, that is, buying into <strong>the</strong> parameters set by patriarchy. It is thisconceptualization of generationality that structures <strong>third</strong>-<strong>wave</strong> feminist <strong>the</strong>ory.It is important to emphasise that <strong>the</strong> concept gets constructed when two generationsof <strong>feminists</strong> work toge<strong>the</strong>r.Third-Wave Feminist Generationality:Anti-Representationalist and Affirmative ConceptualizationsThird-<strong>wave</strong> feminism allows for a conceptualization of generationality that qualitativelyshifts <strong>the</strong> patriarchal one several second-<strong>wave</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> bought into byfollowing a classificatory logic. It also stages a non-dualist, Unoedipal relationalitybetween two generations of <strong>feminists</strong>, that is, it performs <strong>the</strong> female line inRich’s spirit. Playful conceptualization continues <strong>the</strong> work of breaking through<strong>the</strong> referentiality and negativity that structures conventional (feminist) conceptualizationsof generationality, and works towards a <strong>new</strong> concept predicated onanti-representationalism and affirmation. Anti-representationalist, affirmative14Cf. Elizabeth Grosz, “Histories of a Feminist Future,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25 (summer2000): 1017–21.24
generationality, in <strong>the</strong>ory as well as in (teaching) practice, involves a feminismof sexual difference that affirms <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r-daughter relationship, empiricallyas well as figuratively, precisely because it does not make sense to negate it. 15 Ino<strong>the</strong>r words, it does not embark upon what Rich has called a ‘matrophobia.’ 16Negation entails remaining confined <strong>with</strong>in <strong>the</strong> framework that one intendsto shift, because, as Michel Serres has powerfully stated: “An idea opposed toano<strong>the</strong>r idea is always <strong>the</strong> same idea, albeit affected by <strong>the</strong> negative sign. Themore you oppose one ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> more you remain in <strong>the</strong> same frameworkof thought.” 17 This is clearly illustrated by <strong>the</strong> second-<strong>wave</strong> feminist patriarchalconceptualization of generationality. Intending to break through second<strong>wave</strong>feminism as well as patriarchy, <strong>third</strong>-<strong>wave</strong> feminism exchanges negationfor affirmation. The creativity that is necessary for this shift includes antirepresentationalism.The <strong>the</strong>orists whom I call ‘<strong>third</strong>-<strong>wave</strong> feminist’ includeSara Ahmed and Claire Colebrook. Third-<strong>wave</strong> feminist practices are to befound in a teaching context, but also in <strong>the</strong> socio-political and cultural sphere.The music of for instance <strong>the</strong> U.S. band Le Tigre (particularly <strong>the</strong>ir song ‘HotTopic’) and <strong>the</strong> Profesora project of <strong>the</strong> Swedish performer Catti Brandeliusare exemplary instances. However, let me continue first <strong>with</strong> discussing <strong>the</strong>second-<strong>wave</strong> feminism of sexual difference that <strong>third</strong>-<strong>wave</strong>rs work <strong>with</strong>.Second-<strong>wave</strong> feminism of sexual difference came in two guises. First, <strong>the</strong>reis thinking ‘difference’ according to <strong>the</strong> Anglo-American definition: of which <strong>the</strong>practice ‘feminist standpoint epistemology’ 18 was <strong>the</strong> famous epistemic outcome.Second, <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong> feminism of sexual difference according to <strong>the</strong> Frenchtradition. In <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 80s this work had, however, not yet become sedimentedinto <strong>the</strong> classifications of feminist <strong>the</strong>ory that were so central to genderstudies when post-feminism was hailed by its students and by young activists in<strong>the</strong> 1990s. Rosi Braidotti ended Patterns of Dissonance, her book-length study ofradical French feminist <strong>the</strong>ories of sexual difference, by asking whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> voicesof <strong>the</strong> <strong>feminists</strong> under study had been heard. 19 The implied answer in <strong>the</strong> beginningof <strong>the</strong> 1990s was clearly: no, <strong>the</strong>y had not. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Rich, who isfrom <strong>the</strong> U.S., shows how <strong>the</strong> two traditions converge as well as diverge.15Braidotti in Henry, Not My Mo<strong>the</strong>r’s Sister, 11.16Rich, Of Woman Born, 235.17Michel Serres <strong>with</strong> Bruno Latour, “Third Conversation: Demonstration and Interpretation,” in Conversations onScience, Culture, and Time (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1995): 81.18Harding , The Science Question.19Rosi Braidotti, Patterns of Dissonance: A Study of Women and Contemporary Philosophy (Cambridge: Polity Press,1991), 273.25
- Page 1: Teaching with the Third WaveNew Fem
- Page 4 and 5: © Åse Bengtsson and Catti Brandel
- Page 6 and 7: “This Is Not Therapy!” 75Un/Exp
- Page 9 and 10: PrefaceThe idea of writing this boo
- Page 11 and 12: IntroductionDaniela Gronold, Brigit
- Page 13 and 14: Brandelius who is portrayed on the
- Page 15 and 16: The institutional context of Women
- Page 17: The chapters present new feminist e
- Page 20 and 21: IntroductionSecond-wave feminism is
- Page 22 and 23: Second-Wave Feminist Generationalit
- Page 24 and 25: and conflictual ones), and since th
- Page 28 and 29: The Anglo-American and the French t
- Page 30 and 31: To traverse the classifications of
- Page 32 and 33: ing system without a General and wi
- Page 34 and 35: Let me end this chapter by providin
- Page 36 and 37: Buikema tells the story of Sarah Ba
- Page 38 and 39: Roof, Judith. “Generational Diffi
- Page 40 and 41: postmodern capitalism and the impli
- Page 42 and 43: European scope and its neoliberal c
- Page 44 and 45: front. A strong motivation offered
- Page 46 and 47: In her editorial response to Hemmin
- Page 48 and 49: Gender Studies’, 28 I agree with
- Page 50 and 51: expected to play a central role as
- Page 52 and 53: Implications for teaching gender: d
- Page 54 and 55: These re- appropriations cannot be
- Page 56 and 57: Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Fle
- Page 58 and 59: We are both white scholars who grew
- Page 60 and 61: mapped in the first part of project
- Page 62 and 63: able much earlier; therefore the pe
- Page 64 and 65: Using the example of Germany Wollra
- Page 66 and 67: of a link to already existing stere
- Page 68 and 69: The alien’s green colour tells of
- Page 70 and 71: Implications of teaching Critical W
- Page 72 and 73: ness to people with different backg
- Page 74 and 75: theories. This concept can be fruit
- Page 76 and 77:
Räthzel, Nora. “Nationalism and
- Page 78 and 79:
nism’ in the classroom. Thus, whi
- Page 80 and 81:
As a method, memory work focuses on
- Page 82 and 83:
ence on the teaching. This was beca
- Page 84 and 85:
when we wanted them to do memory wo
- Page 86 and 87:
in the consciousness-raising groups
- Page 88 and 89:
as a therapeutic method, they not o
- Page 90 and 91:
“Empowerment has, however, someti
- Page 92 and 93:
fascination with the strong commona
- Page 94 and 95:
practice”. 43 She explains MacKin
- Page 96 and 97:
has been exposed to subjection by o
- Page 98 and 99:
Sebastien, Amanda. “Tendencies in
- Page 100 and 101:
a historical moment when technologi
- Page 102 and 103:
As earlier noted, there are certain
- Page 104 and 105:
new per se, they like Internet-base
- Page 106 and 107:
where technological and media accou
- Page 108 and 109:
to avoid binaristic traps, rejectin
- Page 110 and 111:
ReferencesBraidotti, Rosi. Metamorp
- Page 112 and 113:
IntroductionIn 2007, with two other
- Page 114 and 115:
WoMen at workIn all, it took us alm
- Page 116 and 117:
Facing Uncertainties and Self-quest
- Page 118 and 119:
Doctorate degree’s curricula for
- Page 120 and 121:
In addition, many feminist academic
- Page 122 and 123:
and duties which are seen as comple
- Page 124 and 125:
answers adapted to their own profes
- Page 126 and 127:
As the form of the message counts a
- Page 128 and 129:
ReferencesBlanchard, Soline, Jules
- Page 130 and 131:
As the learning outcomes demonstrat
- Page 132 and 133:
Within the organizational structure
- Page 134 and 135:
Gender-sensitive didactics can be p
- Page 136 and 137:
A further dimension is knowledge ab
- Page 138 and 139:
Teaching materialsSince language is
- Page 140 and 141:
and absences, both short term and p
- Page 142 and 143:
The cliché cloakroomSometimes it w
- Page 144 and 145:
and goatees, later almost all wante
- Page 146 and 147:
Presentations from the working grou
- Page 148 and 149:
ConclusionTeachers’ self-reflecti
- Page 150 and 151:
Mühlen Achs, Gitta. Geschlecht bew
- Page 152:
Milka Metso, PhD Candidate, Univers