front. A strong motivation offered to feminist academics for implementingBologna lies in <strong>the</strong> potential for achieving greater autonomy for <strong>the</strong> field. Theintegration/autonomy debate is contextually framed 11 and for this reason it istoo complicated to be dealt <strong>with</strong> in a few lines. Thus I only focus on one ofits related aspects, <strong>the</strong> epistemological ones, and I argue that in <strong>the</strong> long runBologna might be linked <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> promotion of interdisciplinarity (thoughnot in an uncontested way, see <strong>the</strong> next section). While <strong>the</strong> integration/mainstreamingstrategy leads to <strong>the</strong> integration of Women’s/Gender Studies intoexisting disciplines leaving disciplinarity unchallenged, <strong>the</strong> autonomy strategyleads to autonomous centers/departments at universities, providing <strong>the</strong>m<strong>with</strong> separate budgets, freedom to define and develop <strong>the</strong>ir own programs,award degrees on all levels (BA, MA, PhD), appoint professors, promote interdisciplinaryfeminist work and develop innovative pedagogies and assessmentmethods. 12 While integration may end up as various forms of invisibility, 13autonomy allows for more free space for women’s thinking and critical reflection.In addition, <strong>the</strong> institutional autonomy of Women’s/Gender Studies islinked <strong>with</strong> epistemological issues concerning <strong>the</strong> disciplinization of <strong>the</strong> field.Is Women’s/Gender Studies a <strong>new</strong> discipline? And if it is, should it be defined asa post-disciplinary discipline 14 which is differentiated from traditional disciplinesthrough its use of interdisciplinarity? 15 Unlike Second Wave <strong>feminists</strong> who havebeen struggling for <strong>the</strong> field’s institutionalization and legitimization, ThirdWave <strong>feminists</strong> find <strong>the</strong>mselves in a field which, as Dölling and Hark acknowledge,has “moved from <strong>the</strong> margin to <strong>the</strong> center.” 16 In this context, inter- ortransdisciplinarity are considered to be <strong>the</strong> means for critically reexaminingfeminism, describing <strong>the</strong> <strong>new</strong> kinds of social relations that emerge in our post-11Clare Hemmings analyses how <strong>the</strong> integration vs. autonomy debate has been negotiated differently in differentnational contexts in her paper “The Life and Times of Academic Feminism,” in Handbook of Gender and Women’sStudies, ed. Kathy Davis, Mary Evans and Judith Lorber (London: Sage, 2006), 16-21.12Ibid., 16; and Nina Lykke, “Women’s/Gender/Feminist Studies — A Post-disciplinary Discipline?,” in The Makingof European Women’s Studies, Vol. V., ed. Rosi Braidotti, Edyta Just and Marlise Mensink (ATHENA/UtrechtUniversity, 2004), 100.13Rosi Braidotti, “Key Terms and Issues in <strong>the</strong> Making of European Women’s Studies,” in The Making of EuropeanWomen’s Studies, Vol. I., ed. Rosi Braidotti and Ester Vonk (ATHENA/Utrecht University, 2000), 30-31.14Lykke, “Women’s/Gender/Feminist Studies — A Post-disciplinary Discipline?”, 9615Sabine Hark, “Magical Sign: On <strong>the</strong> Politics of Inter- and Transdisciplinarity,” Graduate Journal of Social Science4, no. 2 (2007), 14.16Irene Dölling and Sabine Hark, “She Who Speaks Shadow Speaks Truth: Transdisciplinarity in Women’s andGender Studies”, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 25, no. 4 (2000), 1195. This claim should be understoodin relation <strong>with</strong> specific national/local contexts. For example in Greece Third Wave feminist academics need togive institutional fights in order to sustain <strong>the</strong> field’s integration which has been achieved by Second Wave feministacademics, and move on <strong>with</strong> establishing <strong>the</strong> fields’ autonomy.42
industrial world and producing feminist knowledge which will be critical of<strong>the</strong> dominant order and of its own epistemological foundations in <strong>the</strong> spiritof antifoundationalism. 17 These hotly debated issues <strong>with</strong>in Women’s/GenderStudies are inevitably foregrounded by <strong>the</strong> Bologna process.The second positive impact of <strong>the</strong> Bologna process on EuropeanWomen’s/ Gender Studies is its emphasis on issues of European diversity.According to Hemmings, <strong>the</strong> European tuning debate “necessarily foregroundsboth international differences and similarities <strong>with</strong>in <strong>the</strong> field, andsituates <strong>the</strong>se as institutional as well as <strong>the</strong>oretical questions”. 18 Some of <strong>the</strong>sequestions include <strong>the</strong> English language hegemony and issues of culturaltranslation which have been central <strong>with</strong>in feminist European networking,and especially <strong>with</strong>in ATHENA’s initiatives to advance <strong>the</strong> collaborationbetween European universities and <strong>the</strong> development of a European interdisciplinarycurriculum in Women’s/Gender Studies. Braidotti argues in her article“The Uses and Abuses of <strong>the</strong> Sex/Gender Distinction in European FeministPractices” that <strong>the</strong> project of setting up Women’s Studies in a Europeanperspective has to deal <strong>with</strong> issues of cultural and linguistic diversityin Europe which foreground differences among women. 19 For this reason,European Women’s/Gender Studies has been conceptualized as a trans -cultural and transdisciplinary enterprise which requires an open, dialogicalmode of interaction among Women’s Studies teachers and researcherscooperating in European networks. 20 European tuning seems to be a necessaryprerequisite for students’/staff’s mobility and interaction in <strong>the</strong> <strong>new</strong> Europeancontext, which can provide <strong>the</strong> institutional space for <strong>the</strong> sort of dialogue andcooperation mentioned above.Negative aspectsThe negative aspects of <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> Bologna process on Women’s/ GenderStudies can be summarized through two general points as well: a) issues ofcanonization of <strong>the</strong> field, and b) issues of neoliberalization.17Ibid., 1195, 1197.18Hemmings, “Tuning Problems? Notes on Women’s and Gender Studies and <strong>the</strong> Bologna Process”, 118.19For example, <strong>the</strong> different uses of <strong>the</strong> terms ‘gender/sex’ across different European languages expose <strong>the</strong> differentfeminist cultures that exist in Europe and <strong>the</strong> pressure of <strong>the</strong> Anglo-American dominance. See Rosi Braidotti, “TheUses and Abuses of <strong>the</strong> Sex/Gender Distinction in European Feminist Practices,” in Thinking Differently: A Reader inEuropean Women’s Studies, ed. Gabrielle Griffin and Rosi Braidotti (London and New York: Zed Books, 2002), 285-307.20Ibid.43
- Page 1: Teaching with the Third WaveNew Fem
- Page 4 and 5: © Åse Bengtsson and Catti Brandel
- Page 6 and 7: “This Is Not Therapy!” 75Un/Exp
- Page 9 and 10: PrefaceThe idea of writing this boo
- Page 11 and 12: IntroductionDaniela Gronold, Brigit
- Page 13 and 14: Brandelius who is portrayed on the
- Page 15 and 16: The institutional context of Women
- Page 17: The chapters present new feminist e
- Page 20 and 21: IntroductionSecond-wave feminism is
- Page 22 and 23: Second-Wave Feminist Generationalit
- Page 24 and 25: and conflictual ones), and since th
- Page 26 and 27: This allows her to conceptualize a
- Page 28 and 29: The Anglo-American and the French t
- Page 30 and 31: To traverse the classifications of
- Page 32 and 33: ing system without a General and wi
- Page 34 and 35: Let me end this chapter by providin
- Page 36 and 37: Buikema tells the story of Sarah Ba
- Page 38 and 39: Roof, Judith. “Generational Diffi
- Page 40 and 41: postmodern capitalism and the impli
- Page 42 and 43: European scope and its neoliberal c
- Page 46 and 47: In her editorial response to Hemmin
- Page 48 and 49: Gender Studies’, 28 I agree with
- Page 50 and 51: expected to play a central role as
- Page 52 and 53: Implications for teaching gender: d
- Page 54 and 55: These re- appropriations cannot be
- Page 56 and 57: Puig de la Bellacasa, Maria. “Fle
- Page 58 and 59: We are both white scholars who grew
- Page 60 and 61: mapped in the first part of project
- Page 62 and 63: able much earlier; therefore the pe
- Page 64 and 65: Using the example of Germany Wollra
- Page 66 and 67: of a link to already existing stere
- Page 68 and 69: The alien’s green colour tells of
- Page 70 and 71: Implications of teaching Critical W
- Page 72 and 73: ness to people with different backg
- Page 74 and 75: theories. This concept can be fruit
- Page 76 and 77: Räthzel, Nora. “Nationalism and
- Page 78 and 79: nism’ in the classroom. Thus, whi
- Page 80 and 81: As a method, memory work focuses on
- Page 82 and 83: ence on the teaching. This was beca
- Page 84 and 85: when we wanted them to do memory wo
- Page 86 and 87: in the consciousness-raising groups
- Page 88 and 89: as a therapeutic method, they not o
- Page 90 and 91: “Empowerment has, however, someti
- Page 92 and 93: fascination with the strong commona
- Page 94 and 95:
practice”. 43 She explains MacKin
- Page 96 and 97:
has been exposed to subjection by o
- Page 98 and 99:
Sebastien, Amanda. “Tendencies in
- Page 100 and 101:
a historical moment when technologi
- Page 102 and 103:
As earlier noted, there are certain
- Page 104 and 105:
new per se, they like Internet-base
- Page 106 and 107:
where technological and media accou
- Page 108 and 109:
to avoid binaristic traps, rejectin
- Page 110 and 111:
ReferencesBraidotti, Rosi. Metamorp
- Page 112 and 113:
IntroductionIn 2007, with two other
- Page 114 and 115:
WoMen at workIn all, it took us alm
- Page 116 and 117:
Facing Uncertainties and Self-quest
- Page 118 and 119:
Doctorate degree’s curricula for
- Page 120 and 121:
In addition, many feminist academic
- Page 122 and 123:
and duties which are seen as comple
- Page 124 and 125:
answers adapted to their own profes
- Page 126 and 127:
As the form of the message counts a
- Page 128 and 129:
ReferencesBlanchard, Soline, Jules
- Page 130 and 131:
As the learning outcomes demonstrat
- Page 132 and 133:
Within the organizational structure
- Page 134 and 135:
Gender-sensitive didactics can be p
- Page 136 and 137:
A further dimension is knowledge ab
- Page 138 and 139:
Teaching materialsSince language is
- Page 140 and 141:
and absences, both short term and p
- Page 142 and 143:
The cliché cloakroomSometimes it w
- Page 144 and 145:
and goatees, later almost all wante
- Page 146 and 147:
Presentations from the working grou
- Page 148 and 149:
ConclusionTeachers’ self-reflecti
- Page 150 and 151:
Mühlen Achs, Gitta. Geschlecht bew
- Page 152:
Milka Metso, PhD Candidate, Univers