ISSN 1799-2591<strong>Theory</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Practice</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Language</strong> <strong>Studies</strong>, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 1026-1033, June 2013© 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>.doi:10.4304/tpls.3.6.1026-1033Analysis of the Myths, Photographs <strong>and</strong> Laws <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a MenM<strong>in</strong>glan ZhangForeign <strong>Language</strong> Department, Huaiy<strong>in</strong> Institute of Technology, 223003, Jiangsu, Ch<strong>in</strong>aFade WangForeign <strong>Language</strong> Department, Huaiy<strong>in</strong> Institute of Technology, 223003, Jiangsu, Ch<strong>in</strong>aAbstract—The presentation of myths, photographs <strong>and</strong> laws <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men, thematically related to Ch<strong>in</strong>eseAmerican immigration stories, is an important strategy to reconstruct Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history. By cit<strong>in</strong>gphotographs <strong>and</strong> present<strong>in</strong>g law, K<strong>in</strong>gston reclaims her male ancestors’ past <strong>and</strong> subverts the monologue ofAmerican official history. By rewrit<strong>in</strong>g myths, K<strong>in</strong>gston exposes the dilemma of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans <strong>and</strong>deconstructs a series of American myths such as the myth of America as a melt<strong>in</strong>g pot, the myth of GoldMounta<strong>in</strong>, the myth of freedom <strong>and</strong> democracy; these myths provide a way for K<strong>in</strong>gston to write Ch<strong>in</strong>eseAmericans <strong>in</strong>to American history.Index Terms—Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men, rewrit<strong>in</strong>g myths, cit<strong>in</strong>g photographs, present<strong>in</strong>g law, deconstruct western gr<strong>and</strong>narrative, reconstruct Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American mythic historyI. INTRODUCTIONMax<strong>in</strong>e Hong K<strong>in</strong>gston is one of the most successful Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American writers. Up to now, K<strong>in</strong>gston has publishedfour works of fiction <strong>and</strong> non-fiction, namely, The Woman Warrior (1976), Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men (1980), <strong>and</strong> Tripmaster Monkey:His Fake Book (1989), The Fifth Book of Peace (2003), plus a collection of prose, Hawaii One Summer (1978) . TheWoman Warrior tells of a second –generation girl‘s grop<strong>in</strong>g for a viable female identity as a Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American <strong>in</strong> thelate 1960s. The book was a great success, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1976 won the National Book Critics Circle Award for the bestnonfiction. Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men, a companion piece to The Woman Warrior, has males <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s family as the chiefcharacters. While her first book honors the women of K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s family, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men celebrates the lives <strong>and</strong>accomplishments of the males <strong>in</strong> her family. Aga<strong>in</strong> her literary talents were lauded. On its release, the book wasimmediately named to the American Library Association‘s Notable Books List, <strong>and</strong> won the National Book Award fornonfiction.Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men is composed of six dist<strong>in</strong>ct but related pr<strong>in</strong>cipal stories about the men <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s family. ―The Fatherfrom Ch<strong>in</strong>a‖ is the story about K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s BaBa (father), <strong>in</strong> which K<strong>in</strong>gston tries to imag<strong>in</strong>e the essential events of herfather‘s life <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a from his auspicious birth <strong>and</strong> through his education, to his emigration to the Gold Mounta<strong>in</strong>. ―TheGreat Gr<strong>and</strong>father of the S<strong>and</strong>alwood Mounta<strong>in</strong>‖ is about the adventures of Bak Gong (great gr<strong>and</strong>father) on theHawaiian sugar cane plantation as a contract worker. ―The Gr<strong>and</strong>father of the Sierra Nevada Mounta<strong>in</strong>‖ tells of theheroic story of Ah Gong (gr<strong>and</strong>father) dur<strong>in</strong>g the construction of the First Transcont<strong>in</strong>ental Railroad. ―The Mak<strong>in</strong>g ofMore Americans‖ deals with identity problem fac<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans. Father returns <strong>in</strong> ―The American Father‖ as anew American with a house <strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess after years of struggle. The book ends with ―The Brother <strong>in</strong> Vietnam‖. This isa section devoted to the American-born generations who jo<strong>in</strong>ed the American army <strong>and</strong> won the solid position for theirfamily <strong>in</strong> America.One typical structural feature of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men is the juxtaposition of stories with vignettes. Each pr<strong>in</strong>cipal story aboutthe males <strong>in</strong> K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s family is framed with one or two vignettes, which cover short tales, myths, fragments of law,<strong>and</strong> news reports. These vignettes, vary<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> length, orig<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> theme, are <strong>in</strong>geniously arranged. However, theirfunction was once ignored or mis<strong>in</strong>terpreted by some critics who criticized that these myths were so arbitrarily adaptedthat they totally lost their true features <strong>and</strong> made readers confused <strong>and</strong> annoyed, or that they were loose episodes,hav<strong>in</strong>g no thematic cohesiveness with the historical narratives. But recently, the myths <strong>and</strong> historical facts <strong>in</strong> the bookhave aroused <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest of many critics. Robert G. Lee po<strong>in</strong>ts out that ―for K<strong>in</strong>gston, myths necessarily rebuilt,have a strategic value <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g to analyze contemporary events. She recognizes that the power of myth resides <strong>in</strong> itscapacity to be recontextualized <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>scribed with new mean<strong>in</strong>gs‖ (Lee, 1991, p. 59). Yuan Yuan states that myths <strong>in</strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men ―function as a semiotic empowerment <strong>in</strong> the process of identity formation‖ (Yuan, 1999, p. 292). Gao Yan,by approach<strong>in</strong>g the myths from the perspective of the biographical stories of the Hong family, rearranges them <strong>in</strong>to fourthemes <strong>in</strong> relation to the ma<strong>in</strong> stories, namely, racial oppression, claim<strong>in</strong>g the l<strong>and</strong>, break<strong>in</strong>g silence, <strong>and</strong> culturaldisplacement ( Gao,1996,p.53-95).The author of this thesis agrees with these critics‘ viewpo<strong>in</strong>ts, <strong>and</strong> from the perspective of history-writ<strong>in</strong>g, to theauthor‘s m<strong>in</strong>d, the myths, laws <strong>and</strong> photographs which run parallel to the family stories thematically re<strong>in</strong>force <strong>and</strong>© 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER
THEORY AND PRACTICE IN LANGUAGE STUDIES 1027complement the stories, are <strong>in</strong>dispensible parts of creat<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history. Based on the previous studies, theauthor of this thesis tries to analyze the myths, laws <strong>and</strong> photographs <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men, <strong>and</strong> reveals how K<strong>in</strong>gstonreconstructs Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history through re-read<strong>in</strong>g facts <strong>and</strong> rewrit<strong>in</strong>g myths.II. RE-READING FACTSA. Present<strong>in</strong>g LawsBesides retell<strong>in</strong>g the heroic stories of her male ancestors through her memory <strong>and</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ation, K<strong>in</strong>gston throughoutCh<strong>in</strong>a Men furnishes many factual materials which <strong>in</strong>clude laws, photographs <strong>and</strong> newspaper reports. These factualmaterials, comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the family stories, pose a challenge to the authenticity <strong>and</strong> authority of ma<strong>in</strong>stream Americanhistory.After recount<strong>in</strong>g gr<strong>and</strong>father Ah Goong‘s stories, <strong>and</strong> right <strong>in</strong> the middle of the book, K<strong>in</strong>gston with little comment<strong>in</strong>serts a chapter titled ―The Laws‖, which takes the form of a chronicle <strong>and</strong> enumerates the various U. S. regulations<strong>and</strong> laws discrim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans from the Burl<strong>in</strong>game Treaty of 1868 to the immigration law of 1978.Be<strong>in</strong>g baldly substantial documentary material, this chapter is criticized by some to be anomalous with the variegatednarrative <strong>in</strong> the rest of the book. However, it is recognized <strong>and</strong> praised by such critics as K<strong>in</strong>g-Kok Cheung, DonaldGoellnicht, <strong>and</strong> Shan Dex<strong>in</strong>. The author of this thesis agrees with those critics who th<strong>in</strong>k that this chapter serves wellthe form <strong>and</strong> content of the book. Firstly, this chapter is <strong>in</strong>serted by the author to <strong>in</strong>struct American people who areignorant of the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history <strong>and</strong> content to read her texts from the vantage po<strong>in</strong>t of Orientalism. AsK<strong>in</strong>gston states:The ma<strong>in</strong>stream culture doesn‘t know the history of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans, which has been written well. The ignorancemakes a tension for me, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the new book [Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men] I just couldn‘t take it anymore. So all of a sudden, right <strong>in</strong> themiddle of the stories, plunk—there is an eight-page section of pure history. It starts with the Gold Rush <strong>and</strong> goes rightthrough the various exclusion acts, year by year. (Kim, 1982, p. XVII)Secondly, this chapter provides the general American read<strong>in</strong>g public with a brief chronicle of oppression aga<strong>in</strong>stwhich the heroic deeds of the idealized fathers can be judged. Quite different from immigration histories of otherm<strong>in</strong>orities, early Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history was <strong>in</strong>separable from American laws. Discrim<strong>in</strong>atory laws had accompaniedthe whole immigration process of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans <strong>and</strong> manifested as its dist<strong>in</strong>ctive features. Therefore, K<strong>in</strong>gston‘srecount<strong>in</strong>g these laws is of special significance to deal with Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history. By present<strong>in</strong>g her ancestors‘stories aga<strong>in</strong>st American discrim<strong>in</strong>atory laws, K<strong>in</strong>gston not only exposes the harsh political environments under whichCh<strong>in</strong>ese Americans were forced to labor for more than a century, but makes her historical stories more resonant <strong>and</strong> real.As Cheung po<strong>in</strong>ts out, ―K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s sketches of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men <strong>in</strong> the Hawaiian fields <strong>and</strong> on the railroads may not be‗factual‘, but they are surely truer than the reductive images <strong>in</strong>scribed <strong>in</strong> the merciless canons‖ (Cheung, 1993, p.118).Thirdly, this chapter embodies the climax of racism <strong>and</strong> the dom<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g voices that K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s talk-story seeks toconfound. As Foucault notes <strong>in</strong> Power/Knowledge, ―Law [is] the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal mode of representation of power‖ (Foucault,1980, p. 141), <strong>and</strong> the widespread national racism aga<strong>in</strong>st the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese will <strong>in</strong>evitably lead to <strong>and</strong> ultimately be enforcedby laws. Thus K<strong>in</strong>gston‘s representation of the laws is a straightforward, <strong>and</strong> forceful way of expos<strong>in</strong>g the America‘sdiscrim<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st Ch<strong>in</strong>ese Americans.F<strong>in</strong>ally, the style of the chapter <strong>and</strong> its location <strong>in</strong> the book helps re<strong>in</strong>force the theme of the book. As Goellnichtstates, ―The Laws‖ is ironic <strong>in</strong> three senses. First, the irony surfaces from the facts themselves, as <strong>in</strong> the justaposition:―The United States <strong>and</strong> the Emperor of Ch<strong>in</strong>a cordially recognize the <strong>in</strong>herent <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>alienable right of man to changehis home <strong>and</strong> allegiance ….[but] 1868, the year of the Burl<strong>in</strong>game Treaty, was the year 40,000 Ch<strong>in</strong>ese ancestry wereDriven Out‖ (p.152). ―Though the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese were fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> levee<strong>in</strong>g the San Joaqu<strong>in</strong> Delta for thirteen cents a squareyard, build<strong>in</strong>g the richest agricultural l<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the world, they were prohibited from own<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>and</strong> or real estate‖(p.153).Secondly, the narrative of this chapter carries an ironic undertone by ―imitat<strong>in</strong>g the monological voice of authoriz<strong>in</strong>ghistory‖ <strong>and</strong> by ―uncover[<strong>in</strong>g] both the dullness of this voice <strong>and</strong> its deafness to other, compet<strong>in</strong>g voices, those of them<strong>in</strong>orities suffer<strong>in</strong>g legalized discrim<strong>in</strong>ation‖(Goellnicht,1992,p.196). Thirdly, there is irony <strong>in</strong> the position of thischapter. ―It occupies the middle of the book, a centric position that would appear to be one of (legalized) authority, yetthis centric authority of American laws is subverted <strong>and</strong> contested by ‗eccentric‘ or marg<strong>in</strong>al, but richly imag<strong>in</strong>ativestories of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men that surrounds it‖ (p.197). Goellnicht illustrates that the stories of Ch<strong>in</strong>a Men, surround<strong>in</strong>g thischapter, do not strengthen the monological <strong>and</strong> monotonous authoritative discourse, but subvert it.Thus the above analysis shows that, <strong>in</strong> both style <strong>and</strong> content, the law <strong>in</strong> this chapter furnishes an essential strategy torewrite Ch<strong>in</strong>ese American history.B. Cit<strong>in</strong>g PhotographsIn addition to present<strong>in</strong>g the laws, K<strong>in</strong>gston also resorts to photographs as a strategy to reclaim her male ancestors‘past <strong>and</strong> to challenge the status of official history.Traditionally, the photograph has been seen <strong>in</strong> western culture as a representation of nature, an unmediatedtranscription of reality <strong>in</strong>to film. Just as Tr<strong>in</strong>h T. M<strong>in</strong>h stated, ―The tyranny of the camera goes unchallenged‖(Zackodnik, 1997, p. 55). This notion of photography as veracity endows the photos with the capacity to prove, to eitherpresent factual evidence or st<strong>and</strong> as a fact itself. Because of the supposed truth value, the photograph is often used to© 2013 ACADEMY PUBLISHER