13.07.2015 Views

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taylor MountainINITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONFurthermore, the Master Plan includes a guideline calling for responsible agencies to workclosely with law enforcement <strong>and</strong> the neighborhood to monitor traffic <strong>and</strong> parking in the area.Although the issue of parking is not required to be analyzed under CEQA, the importance of thisissue is reflected in the Master Plan provisions for the Bath-Watt access.Comment: 4. Alternatives. The comment states that there are reasonable alternatives to the Bath-Watt staging area <strong>and</strong> they should be evaluated for disabled access potential. For example, there arewonderful views even higher up if access were located near or through the l<strong>and</strong>s to the south east.Response: Potential alternative access points were reviewed during development of the MasterPlan. There is no publicly owned l<strong>and</strong> on the eastern side of the Preserve, therefore, no otheraccess from the north or east is possible at this time. Any new access in this area would requirepurchase of an easement or acquisition of property, which is unlikely at this time. Given funding<strong>and</strong> other limitations, these types of alternative access were determined to be infeasible.Comment: 5. Unlimited Access Point. The comment states a concern that the easement that the<strong>County</strong> holds on the Bath-Watt property is open ended <strong>and</strong> can be changed in the future to allow anexpansion of uses <strong>and</strong> increased access. The comment concludes that there are no assurances thatlimited access for the disabled will remain the primary reason for this access point <strong>and</strong> that, given thisconcern, the impacts of the proposed access <strong>and</strong> foreseeable future uses on Holl<strong>and</strong> Heights <strong>and</strong>Panorama Drive have not been adequately evaluated or properly mitigated. The comment notes thatthe northern section of property off of Panorama Drive (Bath‐Watt parcel) <strong>and</strong> the Linwood Avenueparcel are within the City’s Urban Services area <strong>and</strong> that could lead to additional uses being developedat the Preserve. The comment mentions the various future uses allowed within the proposed MasterPlan, which the commenter believes supports the notion that the easement is open ended <strong>and</strong> presentsa real concern.Response: The <strong>MND</strong> fully discloses all potential impacts associated with the project, as definedin the Master Plan. Because the proposed access is restricted, the impacts are substantially lessthan a full public unrestricted access. Each allowed use in the Master Plan is assigned to specificareas of the Preserve, within designated development envelopes. See Table B.1-1, Allowed UsesMatrix, in the IS/<strong>MND</strong>. Changing the access to allow unrestricted vehicular access or changingthe allowed uses in the Preserve would require amending the Master Plan, as described inSection 2.5 of the Master Plan. Master Plan amendments will require additional evaluation ofenvironmental impacts of proposed changes, as required under CEQA. The commenter suggeststhat the development of uses such as the visitor center or bed <strong>and</strong> breakfast inn would have animpact on traffic within the neighborhood. These uses would be located on a different area ofthe property near the Kawana Springs Resort staging area, where access is from Kawana SpringsRoad <strong>and</strong> parking would be provided.Comment: 6. Conclusion. The letter concludes with a summary of concerns outlined in the previouscomments: The proposed uses at the Preserve will result in an expansion of the easement from Panorama Drive<strong>and</strong> there is no limitation on future uses Use of the Bath-Watt trail head <strong>and</strong> parking lot will necessarily exacerbate the current roadconditions <strong>and</strong> increase traffic, pedestrian, <strong>and</strong> cyclist presence <strong>and</strong> these issues have not beenproperly evaluated. If the easement were narrowed in scope, there might be a means by which some access forSeptember 2012 APP-5 Final

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!