13.07.2015 Views

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

Initial Study MND - Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Taylor MountainINITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONare specifically tailored to minimize tree <strong>and</strong> vegetation removal <strong>and</strong> to protect scenic vistas ofthe Preserve. Therefore, low-intensity recreational use of Taylor Mountain would not have asubstantial adverse effect on the scenic vistas of Taylor Mountain.b. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees,rock outcroppings, <strong>and</strong> historic buildings within a State scenic highway?LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. As indicated above, most of the project area is identified aspart of a Scenic L<strong>and</strong>scape Unit in the <strong>Sonoma</strong> <strong>County</strong> General Plan <strong>and</strong> is zoned with a ScenicResources overlay district. However, the property does not fall within a State scenic highwaycorridor designation. Developing low level improvements at the proposed staging areas at theedges of the Preserve would minimize effects on the overall scenic resources of the property.Grading, tree removal or other alteration of the property’s visual elements will be minimizedaccording to design guidelines <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards in the Master Plan. As described in Item (a) theproposed trail system will be subject to visual resource protection provisions in the Master Plan(S85, G137 <strong>and</strong> G138) <strong>and</strong> will provide access to scenic areas of the mountain without adverselyaffecting scenic resources.c. Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site <strong>and</strong>its surroundings?LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT. Developing the Preserve would not result in degradation ofthe visual character of the site. Improvements would be limited to development envelopesthat have been selected <strong>and</strong> designed to minimize the level of new construction on theproperty <strong>and</strong> to site structures in or adjacent to existing developed or disturbed areas at lowerelevations of the property. The proposed maximum structure height is generally one story,except in the Kawana Springs Resort area where two stories may be allowed, in the event a bed<strong>and</strong> breakfast inn/hotel is developed. The architectural sketches of the proposed developedareas in the Kawana Springs Resort area are shown in Figure B.1-7 <strong>and</strong> Figure B.3.1-1. Asreflected in these conceptual plans, the appearance of new structures would be consistent withthe visual character of the area <strong>and</strong> would not substantially degrade the existing visual qualityof the site <strong>and</strong> its surroundings. Furthermore, the proposed project would not obstruct anyscenic views from public viewing areas. As described in Item (a), the Master Plan also includesprovisions to ensure that structural improvements <strong>and</strong> staging areas are appropriately l<strong>and</strong>scapedto minimize visual impacts (S142 <strong>and</strong> S153).Some automobiles parked at the staging areas would be visible from off-site locations butwould not be visually obtrusive, as the primary parking areas would be in or adjacent topreviously developed areas at lower elevations that are screened by topography <strong>and</strong>vegetation. In the Bath-Watt area, Master Plan Guideline 180 states that improvements shouldbe located out of view of the adjacent neighborhoods wherever possible. In the Linwood area,Master Plan S186 requires screening of the staging area from neighboring homes.The vehicles at the staging areas would also be visible from some locations on the TaylorMountain site, generally from above the staging areas, but this would not substantially degradethe visual character of the site or wider l<strong>and</strong>scape. New fencing would be visible from off-siteFinal B-30 September 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!