Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 11. School Enjoyment1009080706050403020100LST (Year 1) LST (Year 2) LST (Year 3) TNDFavorable 75.8 76.8 81.0 78.1Unfavorable 24.2 23.2 19.1 21.9Percentage of RespondentsThinking back over the past year in school, how oftendid you enjoy being in school?Figure 12. School PerformancePercentage of Respondents1009080706050403020100Thinking back over the past year in school,how often did you try to do your best in school?LST (Year 1) LST (Year 2) LST (Year 3) TNDFavorable 84.9 82.4 83.1 81.1Unfavorable 15.1 17.6 16.9 18.9Jackson County GRAA Evaluation Report 14
Figure 13. Support from Adult at School1009080706050403020100LST (Year 1) LST (Year 2) LST (Year 3) TNDFavorable 84.0 73.1 79.0 74.8Unfavorable 16.0 26.9 21.0 25.2Percentage of RespondentsThere is at least one adult at school that I could go tofor help with a problem.PROCESS EVALUATIONProcess Evaluation Design and MethodologyThe process evaluation provides insight into the degree of achievement of programgoals. Evaluation methods include: Analysis of the project action plan, committeemeeting participation, and documentation of Communities Mobilizing for Change onAlcohol (CMCA) activities; review of prevention program tracking sheets; processinterviews; and review of counseling data.Process data on the school-based prevention programs are collected using trackingsheets completed by Area Substance Abuse Council (ASAC) Prevention Specialists.One tracking sheet is completed for all LRP groups and another is completed for all LSTand TND groups. These forms are used to monitor program implementation, dosageand fidelity by documenting the type of program, the school where the program isimplemented, the grade level(s) of the youth participating, the number of youthcompleting the pre-test and post-test, the number of lessons implemented and thefrequency of program sessions.Action Plan AnalysisDuring the first project year, project staff followed the Action Plan submitted in the grantproposal. Many of the items in that action plan were directed toward project start-up,Jackson County GRAA Evaluation Report 15
Page 5 and 6: Goal 4Goal 4 is a fifty percent inc
Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTIONBackgroundIn May 2008,
Page 9 and 10: program session of the second year
Page 11 and 12: Figure 1. Life Skills Training Outc
Page 13 and 14: Figure 3. Percentage of Youth Repor
Page 15 and 16: Figure 5. Participant Perceptions o
Page 17 and 18: Figure 8. Participant Perceptions o
Page 19: Figure 10. Project Towards No Drug
Page 23 and 24: Figure 14. Number of People Trained
Page 25 and 26: • Project Sticker ShockProject St
Page 27 and 28: location, time, contact number, and
Page 29: Figure 15. One-On-One Interviews by
Page 33 and 34: of the school year and implementing
Page 35 and 36: mentioned in earlier reports, one s
Page 37 and 38: CONCLUSIONThe American Gothic Revis
Page 39 and 40: Jackson County GRAA SurveyIdentific
Page 41 and 42: 2. On how many occasions during the
Page 43 and 44: 4. How much do you think you riskha
Page 45 and 46: Appendix 2Other Substances DataJack
Page 47 and 48: As shown in Figure 18, TND had a po
Page 49 and 50: Attitude and Perceived Risk of Harm
Page 51 and 52: Appendix 3Project Action Plan Year
Page 53 and 54: teachersRecruit HS students & initi
Page 55 and 56: Logic Model - Underage DrinkingTheo
Page 57 and 58: Year 1 Round 1July 1, 2008 - Januar
Page 59 and 60: 9. What activities has the oversigh
Page 61 and 62: What other actions would you like t
Page 63 and 64: Year 2 Round 1July 1, 2009 - Januar
Page 65 and 66: Year 2 Round 2July 1, 2009 - June 1
Page 67 and 68: • Some respondents also indicated
Page 69 and 70: Appendix 6School-Based Prevention P
Page 71 and 72:
School-Based Prevention Program Imp
Page 73:
School-Based Prevention Program Imp
show all

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?