Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4. What do you think the focus (or goal) of CMCA should be in your community?• Six respondents stated that CMCA needs to affect underage drinking, butmost of these respondents were not sure what form CMCA should take. Tworespondents stated that they were not sure.5. What has this project done for your community?• Five respondents stated that the project has increased community awarenessof the underage drinking problem. Some respondents also noted an increasein community awareness and support for the project. Two respondents statedthat they were either not sure of the impact or that it was too early to noticeany impact on the community. One respondent identified a positive responsefrom school personnel in regards to the counseling component of the project.6. How would you improve the project?• Three respondents stated that more recruitment was needed for CMCA.Three respondents mentioned that more buy-in to the project was neededfrom law enforcement or school personnel. A respondent stated that moreinformation from previous grant recipients would have helped. Anotherrespondent suggested that meetings be held in each school district once asemester to help maintain communication and promote the project.7. How closely did implementation match the plan? What deviations, if any,occurred? What led to the deviations and what was the impact on the project?(Answered by implementation staff and the project coordinator only.)• All respondents stated that, overall, implementation has matched the plan witheach respondent noting at least one deviation. Two respondents stated thatthe first year of LST was being implemented with seventh graders instead ofsixth graders in one district. This was done to better integrate LST into thedistrict. Two respondents identified changes to how LRP was beingimplemented; one stating that LRP was being implemented in two schooldistricts rather than three, and the other noting that LRP did not start until thesecond semester of the first project year. One respondent stated that TNDwas being implemented with tenth graders rather than ninth graders in twodistricts. This change was due to how classes are scheduled in thosedistricts. One respondent stated that the implementation of CMCA has notkept up with the plan because of initial struggles in scheduling meetings andrecruiting members.8. What activities have been initiated to sustain prevention programming beyond thegrant? (Answered by superintendents, the project assistant, and the projectcoordinator only.)• Almost all the respondents identified at least one thing being done to sustainthe project. Some actions undertaken include: embedding programs intoschool plans and classroom curricula; training school personnel andcommunity members to implement the programs; purchasing extra programmaterials; and actively promoting grant activities within the county.Jackson County GRAA Evaluation Report 52
9. What activities has the oversight committee undertaken to effect system-widechange? (Answered by superintendents, the project assistant, and the projectcoordinator only.)• Two respondents stated that nothing had yet been done to effect system-widechange. Other responses included: good conduct policy review and revisions;promote prevention activities and the counseling services; and recruit adiverse and representative group for CMCA.Jackson County GRAA Evaluation Report 53
Page 5 and 6:
Goal 4Goal 4 is a fifty percent inc
Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTIONBackgroundIn May 2008,
Page 9 and 10: program session of the second year
Page 11 and 12: Figure 1. Life Skills Training Outc
Page 13 and 14: Figure 3. Percentage of Youth Repor
Page 15 and 16: Figure 5. Participant Perceptions o
Page 17 and 18: Figure 8. Participant Perceptions o
Page 19 and 20: Figure 10. Project Towards No Drug
Page 21 and 22: Figure 13. Support from Adult at Sc
Page 23 and 24: Figure 14. Number of People Trained
Page 25 and 26: • Project Sticker ShockProject St
Page 27 and 28: location, time, contact number, and
Page 29: Figure 15. One-On-One Interviews by
Page 33 and 34: of the school year and implementing
Page 35 and 36: mentioned in earlier reports, one s
Page 37 and 38: CONCLUSIONThe American Gothic Revis
Page 39 and 40: Jackson County GRAA SurveyIdentific
Page 41 and 42: 2. On how many occasions during the
Page 43 and 44: 4. How much do you think you riskha
Page 45 and 46: Appendix 2Other Substances DataJack
Page 47 and 48: As shown in Figure 18, TND had a po
Page 49 and 50: Attitude and Perceived Risk of Harm
Page 51 and 52: Appendix 3Project Action Plan Year
Page 53 and 54: teachersRecruit HS students & initi
Page 55 and 56: Logic Model - Underage DrinkingTheo
Page 57: Year 1 Round 1July 1, 2008 - Januar
Page 61 and 62: What other actions would you like t
Page 63 and 64: Year 2 Round 1July 1, 2009 - Januar
Page 65 and 66: Year 2 Round 2July 1, 2009 - June 1
Page 67 and 68: • Some respondents also indicated
Page 69 and 70: Appendix 6School-Based Prevention P
Page 71 and 72: School-Based Prevention Program Imp
Page 73: School-Based Prevention Program Imp
show all

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?