13.07.2015 Views

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. What do you think the focus (or goal) of CMCA should be in your community?• Six respondents stated that CMCA needs to affect underage drinking, butmost of these respondents were not sure what form CMCA should take. Tworespondents stated that they were not sure.5. What has this project done for your community?• Five respondents stated that the project has increased community awarenessof the underage drinking problem. Some respondents also noted an increasein community awareness and support for the project. Two respondents statedthat they were either not sure of the impact or that it was too early to noticeany impact on the community. One respondent identified a positive responsefrom school personnel in regards to the counseling component of the project.6. How would you improve the project?• Three respondents stated that more recruitment was needed for CMCA.Three respondents mentioned that more buy-in to the project was neededfrom law enforcement or school personnel. A respondent stated that moreinformation from previous grant recipients would have helped. Anotherrespondent suggested that meetings be held in each school district once asemester to help maintain communication and promote the project.7. How closely did implementation match the plan? What deviations, if any,occurred? What led to the deviations and what was the impact on the project?(Answered by implementation staff and the project coordinator only.)• All respondents stated that, overall, implementation has matched the plan witheach respondent noting at least one deviation. Two respondents stated thatthe first year of LST was being implemented with seventh graders instead ofsixth graders in one district. This was done to better integrate LST into thedistrict. Two respondents identified changes to how LRP was beingimplemented; one stating that LRP was being implemented in two schooldistricts rather than three, and the other noting that LRP did not start until thesecond semester of the first project year. One respondent stated that TNDwas being implemented with tenth graders rather than ninth graders in twodistricts. This change was due to how classes are scheduled in thosedistricts. One respondent stated that the implementation of CMCA has notkept up with the plan because of initial struggles in scheduling meetings andrecruiting members.8. What activities have been initiated to sustain prevention programming beyond thegrant? (Answered by superintendents, the project assistant, and the projectcoordinator only.)• Almost all the respondents identified at least one thing being done to sustainthe project. Some actions undertaken include: embedding programs intoschool plans and classroom curricula; training school personnel andcommunity members to implement the programs; purchasing extra programmaterials; and actively promoting grant activities within the county.<strong>Jackson</strong> <strong>County</strong> GRAA <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!