Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Figure 13. Support from Adult at School1009080706050403020100LST (Year 1) LST (Year 2) LST (Year 3) TNDFavorable 84.0 73.1 79.0 74.8Unfavorable 16.0 26.9 21.0 25.2Percentage of RespondentsThere is at least one adult at school that I could go tofor help with a problem.PROCESS EVALUATIONProcess Evaluation Design and MethodologyThe process evaluation provides insight into the degree of achievement of programgoals. Evaluation methods include: Analysis of the project action plan, committeemeeting participation, and documentation of Communities Mobilizing for Change onAlcohol (CMCA) activities; review of prevention program tracking sheets; processinterviews; and review of counseling data.Process data on the school-based prevention programs are collected using trackingsheets completed by Area Substance Abuse Council (ASAC) Prevention Specialists.One tracking sheet is completed for all LRP groups and another is completed for all LSTand TND groups. These forms are used to monitor program implementation, dosageand fidelity by documenting the type of program, the school where the program isimplemented, the grade level(s) of the youth participating, the number of youthcompleting the pre-test and post-test, the number of lessons implemented and thefrequency of program sessions.Action Plan AnalysisDuring the first project year, project staff followed the Action Plan submitted in the grantproposal. Many of the items in that action plan were directed toward project start-up,Jackson County GRAA Evaluation Report 15