13.07.2015 Views

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

Jackson County Program Evaluation Project Year 3, Report 1.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What other actions would you like to implement as part of CMCA?• A variety of other CMCA actions were identified by the respondents. These actionsinclude: more one-on-one interviews; parent panels on underage drinking; alcoholfreegraduation signs; alcohol server trainings; policy change; either create a CMCAgroup for each of the other three communities or add representatives from othercommunities to the existing CMCA group; and more youth advocacy.5. What has this project done for your community?• Six respondents stated that the project has increased community awareness of theunderage drinking problem. Some respondents also noted an increase in communityawareness and support for the project. One respondent identified an increase instudent awareness of available counseling services.6. How has your community responded to the project?• Seven respondents stated that the response has been positive. One respondentreported that community members were in denial that there was an underagedrinking problem, and that most community members feel that these problems occurin other communities but not their own.7. How closely did implementation match the plan? What deviations, if any, occurred?What led to the deviations and what was the impact on the project? (Answered byimplementation staff and the project coordinator only.)• All respondents stated that implementation has matched the plan pretty closely witheach respondent noting at least one deviation. Two respondents stated that CMCAwas not implemented as planned. These respondents noted that the CMCA trainingwas held much later than planned, which delayed a lot of the CMCA actions duringthe first project year. These respondents also identified the deviation from a CMCAgroup in each district to one county-wide CMCA group.• Two respondents stated that the first year of LST was being implemented withseventh graders instead of sixth graders in one district. This was done to betterintegrate LST into the district. Two respondents reported that TND was beingimplemented with tenth graders rather than ninth graders in two districts. Thischange was due to how classes are scheduled in those districts. One respondentidentified that LRP was being implemented in two school districts rather than three.<strong>Jackson</strong> <strong>County</strong> GRAA <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!