part three - Fishers Ghost

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The following discusses the non compliances with aspects of CSC DCP 2009.Front SetbackThe proposed front setback is set on a skewed angle and ranges from 4.98 metreson the northern side to 9.5 metres on the southern side. The required SCDCP frontsetback is 5.5 metres from the primary street boundary. Two <strong>part</strong>s of the buildingextend beyond the front setback: the western corner of the building (area oversetback 1sqm) and the central stairwell (area over setback 2.1sqm). The variationsof the setback distance are 0.52 metres (corner) and 1.19 metres (stairwell) andrepresent variations of 9% and 22% to the standard respectively.Comment – The building area lying over the front setback – 1sqm and 2.1sqm isvery minor. The setback on the southern side of the building has been increased to9.5 metres to allow a mature existing pine tree to be retained in the front setbackarea and the building is placed on a skewed angle to the street. The variation isconsidered to be acceptable having regard to the orientation and dimensions of theallotment and the fact that adequate site distances along the frontage are retained.Side SetbackThe proposed side setback of the front building (Units 1-8) is 1.2 metres. Therequired side setback for multi dwelling units for all levels above ground level is 1.5metres. The variation of the setback distance is 0.3 metres.Comment – The applicant has submitted that a 0.9 metre side setback should applyfor the development as the development type is not-multi dwelling development. Thedevelopment type is defined as “in-fill self-care housing” under the Seniors HousingState Environmental Planning Policy and the definition of “multi dwelling housing”development is the most comparable development type contained in Council’sCampbelltown (Urban Area) Local Environmental Plan 2002 and Council’sSustainable City Development Control Plan 2009. Whilst there may be someinconsistencies in defining the development, the Seniors Housing SEPP does notcontain development standards for side setbacks and Council’s developmentstandards for multi dwellings are the most practically applicable for the developmenttype.Notwithstanding these definition issues, it is considered that the proposed 1.2 metreside setback will not result in a significant loss of amenity as the variation exists for13 metres of the 51 metre side boundary (25%). Also, given that there is good solaraccess and privacy will be maintained the variation is considered to be acceptable.v. State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index)A BASIX Certificate has been provided for the proposed development and therelevant commitments made on the architectural / development plans. Therefore it isconsidered that the proposal is acceptable in this regard.
vi.Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges RiverCatchmentThe proposal does not conflict with any of the relevant provisions of GreaterMetropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No. 2 – Georges River Catchment, and istherefore considered acceptable in this regard.vii.Campbelltown City Council Section 94A Development Contributions PlanDevelopment contributions are applicable pursuant to the provisions of theCampbelltown City Council Section 94A Development Contributions Plan andaccordingly condition 25 has been included within the recommended conditions,requiring payment of such.viii. Environmental ImpactsSection 79C(1)(b) of the EP&A Act requires Council to consider the “likely impacts ofthat development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and builtenvironments, and social and economic impacts in the locality.” The issues identifiedfor consideration are suitability of the site and car parking and access as discussedbelow.Suitability of the SiteThe proposed development is located in a residential area over two allotments thatare located nearby to the Leumeah neighbourhood shopping area and train station.The site area is sufficient to accommodate the type of proposed development withoutadversely impacting on the amenity of adjoining neighbours.Car Parking and AccessCar parking for the development is located at the rear of the site with a central pavedmanoeuvring area. A driveway provides access to the rear along the southernboundary. There is sufficient room for two vehicles to pass adjacent to each other atthe entry of the driveway before the driveway narrows along the side of the mainbuilding and then connects to the rear paved area. The visual impact of the carparking area as viewed from the street is minimal as it is located behind the buildingline with landscaping along the both sides of the driveway and in front of carportsalong the southern boundary. The visual impact of the car ports on neighbouringproperties is reduced by the car ports being located in groups against each of theside and rear boundaries with vegetation in the rear corners of the site breaking upthe built form. The car port structures do not have a bulky form having a roofsupported by posts only. Two disabled car spaces (with car port) are proposed alongthe rear boundary with good manoeuvring areas available for turning. A footpathprovides pedestrian access from the front to the rear of the site. Overall it isconsidered that satisfactory car parking and access is provided for the proposeddevelopment.
Page 1 and 2: PART THREEReports of the Planning a
Page 3 and 4: Minutes of the Planning and Environ
Page 5 and 6: 3.3 Nos. 104-106 O’Sullivan Road
Page 7 and 8: i. Campbelltown 2025 Looking Forwar
Page 9 and 10: development of a kind identified in
Page 11 and 12: Criteria Proposed Commentoverall av
Page 13 and 14: Criteria Proposed CommentClause 33
Page 19 and 20: Section Control Requirement Propose
Page 25: Section Control Requirement Propose
Page 29 and 30: ConclusionCouncil has received a de
Page 31 and 32: 4. Notification of Home Building Ac
Page 33 and 34: 13. Rain Water TanksThe applicant s
Page 35 and 36: 21. Soil and Water Management PlanP
Page 37 and 38: a. Showing the name of the principa
Page 39 and 40: The following conditions of consent
Page 41 and 42: A separate application for this wor
Page 43 and 44: 55. BASIXPrior to the principal cer
Page 45 and 46: uilding, the subject of this permit
Page 47 and 48: ATTACHMENT 3
Page 57: ATTACHMENT 13

part three - Fishers Ghost

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?