Q ST QUA TAT ALIT US O TY IN OF W N IN WA NDIA ATER A- 2 R ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER VII7.1 Mahi River SystemWater Quality of Rivers in Mahi BasinThe Mahi basin extends over an area of 34,842 sq. km. The interstate river Mahiis 583 km long, originating in Madhya Pradesh, passing through Rajasthan andGujarat and draining into the Gulf of Khambhat. The Mahi flows northwardsinitially entering into Banswara district and then turning southward flowingthrough Udaipur and Dungarpur districts before entering into Gujarat. In Gujarat,it flows through Panchmahal, Kheda, Vadodara and Bharuch districts beforedraining into the Gulf. The principal tributaries of the river are the Som from theright and the Anas and the Panam from the left. The important urban centres inthe watershed of Mahi are Godhra, Vadodara, Dohad and Dadhoi in Gujarat;Ratlam, Jaora in Madhya Pradesh; and Banswara in Rajasthan.Vadodara is a metropolitan city as well as a centre for industrial activity. InVadodara majority of industrial units are pharmaceutical and petrochemicals,besides units of caustic soda; distillery, fertilizer, dyes and pesticides also exist.The wastewater generated by IPCL, GSFC, Gujarat refinery, GIDC, Indian Dyestuff (P) Ltd. are being discharged into the Gulf of Khambhat through theVadodara effluent channel. Although the large Vadodara industrial complex hasextended considerably to the west of the small Dhadhar creek and dischargeslarge quantity of effluent into the tidal segment of the river Mahi, the Dhadhar hasits own independent catchment area (outside Mahi Basin) inclusive of its tinytributary Viswamitri which is extremely polluted by the effluent generated fromVadodara.7.2 Water Quality Monitoring in Mahi BasinThe State Pollution Control Boards of Gujarat and Rajasthan at 17 locations aredoing the water quality monitoring of the River Mahi and several tributaries in thebasin. The monitoring locations are on mainstream of River Mahi (11) andtributaries- Anas (1), Panam (1), Jammer (1), Malei (1), Shivna (1) and Chillar(1). The ranges of water quality observed in River Mahi, Panam and Anas withrespect to Temperature, DO, pH, Conductivity, BOD, Nitrate +Nitrite-N, FaecalColiform and Total Coliform are presented as minimum, maximum and meanvalue to assess the extent of water quality variation throughout the year.7.2.1 Water quality of River Mahi and its tributary streams Shivna, Jammer,Malei, Chillar, Anas and PanamThe water quality of River Mahi is meeting the desired criteria with respect toTotal Coliform and Faecal Coliform. pH is observed in the range of 7.1-9.1 and is81
not meeting the criteria at D/S Conf with R. Chap(Under Sagwara-Sarhi Rd.Bdg.) (9.1) in Rajasthan; at Mahi A/c Anas at Pardi (Banaswada)& Sevalia (8.7),at Virpur & Near Rajasthan Border at Kadana Dam (8.6) in Gujarat. TheConductivity lies in the range of 256 -1310 µmhos/cm.The DO lies in the range of3.2-8. 9 mg/l and is not meeting the criteria at D/s conf with R. Chap (3.2 mg/l) inRajasthan. The BOD is observed in the range of 0.6 -8 mg/l and is not meeting thecriteria at A/c Anas at Pardi(Banaswada) (8 mg/l),at Virpur, Sevalia & Mahinear rajasthan border at Kadana Dam (5mg/l) in Gujarat.The Faecal Coliformrangesfrom 2-9 MPN/100ml and the Total Coliform is in the range of 7-28MPN/ /100ml and is meeting the desired crietria.The water qualityof tributary streams River Shivna at Ramghat, Mandsaur (4mg/l) in Madhya Pradesh and River Anas at Dahod, (Kushalgarh),Dist.Panchmahal & River Panam at Lunawada (5 mg/l) in Gujarat is not complyingwith the criteria in the respect of BOD.The DO isnot meeting the criteria inRiver Panam at Lunawada (3 mg/l) in Gujarat. pH is not meetingwith the criteriain River Shivna at Ramghat, Mandsaur ( 8.6) in Madhya Pradeshand River Anasat Dahod, (Kushalgarh), Dist. Panchmahal & River Panam at Lunawada (8.6) inGujarat.The waterquality data of River Mahi and itstributaries Shivna, Jammer,Malei, Chillar, Anas and Panam with respect to Temperature, pH, DO,Conductivity, BOD, Nitrate +Nitrite, Total Coliform(TC) and Faecal Coliform(FC) is presented in Annexure-I Table 7.1. The waterquality status of River Mahiwith respect to BOD, DO, Total Coliform, Faecal Coliform andConductivity ispresented in Figure 7.1.Figure 7.1: Water Quality of River MahiB.O.D. (mg/l)WATER QUALITY OF RIVER MAHI‐201110.09.08.07.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0D/S conf R Umeta Chap Bdg MujpurSevalia Vasad Kadana A/CAnasBanaswadaDam VirpurMinMaxMean0.6 1.0 2.02.1 1.0 3.11.0 1.0 2.50.9 2.0 1.71.1 0.95.0 2.0 5.08.0 5.03.3 2.0 3.43.2 3.1D.O. (mg/l)WATER QUALITY OF RIVER MAHI‐201110.09.08.07.06.05.04.03.02.01.00.0MinMaxMeanD/ /S conf RUmeta BdgMujpur Sevalia VasadKadanaChap3.2 7.8 7.28.4 7.8 8.05.4 7.8 7.8Dam A/CanasBanaswada Virpur6.9 8.8 7.17.0 7.08.3 8.8 8.98.2 8.87.6 8.8 7.77 7.7 7.782
Page 1:
Monitoring of Indiann National Aqua
Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTSExecutive SummaryPageI-XIII
Page 6 and 7:
9.1 Narmada River System9.2 Water Q
Page 8 and 9:
PageChapter XIX Water Quality of La
Page 10 and 11:
(E), Varuna, Sai, Gomti, Rapti, Sar
Page 12:
Purna, Kanhan, Wena, Darna, Nira, P
Page 16 and 17:
Tapi 10.0 16.0 Decreasing Vel 14.0
Page 18 and 19:
KeralaOrissaJanunia Talab inMadhya
Page 20 and 21:
Imphal, Kallai, Puzhackal, Venna &W
Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 1WATER AVAILABILITY, POLLUT
Page 24 and 25:
1.1.2 Industrial RequirementAnother
Page 26 and 27:
Population Stress and water insecur
Page 28 and 29:
industrial establishments and runof
Page 30 and 31:
for different uses have been identi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER-IIWATER QUALITY MONITORING
Page 34 and 35:
Table-2.2 List of Parametersunder N
Page 36 and 37:
2.4 State/UnionTerritory (UT) Level
Page 38 and 39:
PUNJAB(TOTAL‐69)•RIVERS :38•L
Page 40 and 41:
BOD, FC and TC whereas DO, pH and C
Page 42 and 43:
whereas Conductivity, Nitrate, FC a
Page 44 and 45:
environment. Water Quality (ground
Page 46 and 47:
Conductivity, TC and FC is confirmi
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.5: SURFACE WATER- Percent V
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.7: RIVERS- Percent Violatio
Page 52 and 53: Table 2.9: PONDS- Percent Violation
Page 54 and 55: Figure 2: Water Quality Trend (BOD,
Page 56 and 57: Figure 3.3: Water Quality Trend of
Page 62 and 63: Table 3.1: Water Quality in Indian
Page 64 and 65: Name of theRiverLength (Km)No of Mo
Page 70 and 71: 4.1 Indus River SystemCHAPTER IVWat
Page 72 and 73: FECAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
Page 74 and 75: Figure 4.3: Water Quality of River
Page 76 and 77: 5.1 Ganga River SystemCHAPTER VWate
Page 78 and 79: 12WATER QUALITY OF RIVER GANGA IN U
Page 80 and 81: FAECAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100000100
Page 82 and 83: TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100000010
Page 84 and 85: CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)1000100101W
Page 88 and 89: The availability of water in River
Page 90 and 91: The low value of DO (0.0 mg/l) is o
Page 92 and 93: CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
Page 94 and 95: Burhi Gandak, Harbora, Kamla, Manus
Page 96 and 97: The Faecal Coliform value ranges fr
Page 98 and 99: CHAPTER VIWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 100 and 101: TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)1000001000
Page 104 and 105: TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100WATER Q
Page 106 and 107: 8.2 Water Quality Monitoring in Sab
Page 108 and 109: presented as minimum, maximum and m
Page 110 and 111: CHAPTER X10.1 Tapi River SystemWate
Page 112 and 113: The water quality of other tributar
Page 114 and 115: CHAPTER XIWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 116 and 117: Conductivity, BOD, Nitrate +Nitrite
Page 118 and 119: 100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVER MAHANA
Page 120 and 121: 100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVERR MAHAN
Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER XIIWater Quality of Rivers
Page 126 and 127: 12.4 Water Quality of River Baitarn
Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER XIIIWater Quality of Rivers
Page 130 and 131: B.O.D. (mg/l)8.0WATER QUALITY OF RI
Page 132 and 133: CHAPTER XIVWater Quality of Rivers
Page 139 and 140: CHAPTER XVWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 143 and 144: TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
Page 145 and 146: BOD ranges from 1.4 to 23.5 mg/l in
Page 147 and 148: 16.2.1 Water Quality ofRiver Penner
Page 149 and 150: WATER QUALITY OF RIVER CAUVERY INKA
Page 151 and 152: CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
Page 153 and 154:
CHAPTER XVIIIWater Quality of Mediu
Page 155 and 156:
18.4 Water Quality of Medium and Mi
Page 157 and 158:
The water quality monitoring of Riv
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 18.2: Water Quality of River
Page 161 and 162:
18.8.1 Water Quality of Creeks and
Page 163 and 164:
19.1 Lantic Water BodiesCHAPTER XIX
Page 165 and 166:
DO varies from 0.4 mg/l to 14.3 mg/
Page 167 and 168:
(1.9 mg/l) & Surinsar Lake (2.2 mg/
Page 169 and 170:
CHAPTER XXAssessment of Groundwater
Page 171 and 172:
20.6 Status of Ground Water Quality
Page 173 and 174:
Paithan (4.0 mg/ l), TPS Durgapur (
Page 175 and 176:
varies from 356-1015 µmhos/cm and
Page 177 and 178:
SIRSA AT D/S NALAGARH DISTT.HIMACHA
Page 179 and 180:
KOSHI RIVER AT KURSHELA ATBIHAR2565
Page 181 and 182:
POINT OF OIL INDIA LTD.)2065 PAGLDI
Page 183 and 184:
TABLE 11.1 : - WATER QUALITY OF RIV
Page 185 and 186:
TABLE 13.1 :- WATER QUALITY OF RIVE
Page 187 and 188:
2723RLY BDG, HINGANGHAT 0 0 4WENA A
Page 189 and 190:
MULA AT HARRISON BRIDGE NEAR2194MAH
Page 191 and 192:
DAMANGANGA AT DAMAN JETTY, MOTI DAM
Page 193 and 194:
2293 R KADALUNDI AT HAJIRAPPALLY KE
Page 195 and 196:
0 0 8 8GHAGGAR AT U/S DHAKANSU NALL
Page 197 and 198:
CHOUPATHY. 0 0 0 0 326. 29. 28.1928
Page 199 and 200:
25. 26. 26.1579 ALAPPUZHA KERALA5.6
Page 201 and 202:
BASKANDI POND INSIDE THE2225ASSAM 8
Page 203 and 204:
22.283 286 285 2.7 3.4 3.051 5 3224
Page 205 and 206:
WELL AT ELOOR, KERALAKERALA26.1924
Page 207 and 208:
AKOT, AKOLA22. 7.82002MAHARASHTRA 2
Page 209 and 210:
OPPOSITE PRIVATE BUS STAND,7.12030A
Page 211 and 212:
1658NEAR RIVER KUSHABHADRA, PURI,OR
show all

Q ST QUA TAT ALIT US O TY IN OF W N IN WA NDIA ATER A- 2 R ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?