varies from 0.0 to 82.0 mg/l whereas the highest value is observed in Asani Kuntaat Medak in Andhra Pradesh. The water quality status of Lakes, Tanks and Pondsin Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamilnadu, Pondicherry and Goa ispresented in Annexure-I Table 19.1.19.3 Water Quality of Lakes & Ponds in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh andRajasthanThe respective State Pollution Control Boards carry out the water qualitymonitoring of Lakes and Ponds in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. DOvaries from 1.2 to 11.3 mg/l with minimum at Pushkar Lake (1.2 mg/l), JaisamandLake, Lodha Talab & Jalmahal Lake (1.8 mg/l), Siliserh Lake (2.0 mg/l), NakkiLake (2.3 mg/l), Jet Sagar Lake (2.7 mg/l) & Udaisagar Lake (3.2 mg/l) inRajasthan and Sursagar Lake (3.2 mg/l) & City Lake (3.3 mg/l) in Gujarat.BOD is observed in the range of 0.0 mg/l to 27 mg/l with maximum at GapeSagar Lake (27 mg/l) in Rajasthan. Other Lakes and Tanks having high BOD andnot meeting the standard of BOD are Jaisamand Lake (26.5 mg/l); Siliserh Lake(23.0 mg/l); Jalmahal Lake (14.0 mg/l); Lodha Talab (12.8 mg/l); Pushkar Lake(9.5 mg/l); Udaisagar Lake (7.8 mg/l); Jet Sagar Lake (4.1 mg/l); Nakki Lake (3.8mg/l) and Fateh Sagar Lake (3.4 mg/l) in Rajasthan; Sursagar Lake (12.0 mg/l);City Lake (10.0 mg/l); Narsimehta Lake (8.0 mg/l); Ajwah Lake (5.0 mg/l) andNalsarovar (4.0 mg/l) in Gujarat and Shahpura Lake (8.5 mg/l); Upper Lake atKarbala Talab (5.5 mg/l), Yatch Club (4.5 mg/l), Bairagarh Club (4.5 mg/l) &Intake Point Bhopal (4.1 mg/l); Lower Lake (4.5 mg/l); Govindgarh Lake (4.3mg/l); Janunia Talab (4.3 mg/l); Periat Lake (3.6 mg/l) and Kerwa Dam (3.1 mg/l)in Madhya Pradesh.The water quality of Lakes and tanks in respective states is meeting the waterquality criteria with respect to Total Coliform and Faecal Coliform at most of thelocations except in Moticher Lake (24000 & 4300 MPN/100ml) in Gujarat. Theconcentration of Nitrate (NO 3 - ) varies from Nil to 4.41 mg/l. The water qualitystatus of Lakes & Ponds in Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan is presentedin Annexure-I Table 19.2.19.4 Water Quality of Lakes & Ponds in Haryana, Chandigarh, HimachalPradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and UttarakhandThe respective State Pollution Control Boards carry out the water qualitymonitoring of Lakes and Ponds in Haryana, Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh,Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.All the lakes and ponds monitored are meeting the required level of water qualitycriteria in respect of DO, pH and conductivity at most of the locations except DOin Laxmi Pond (0.0 mg/l) & Maahil Pond (3.6 mg/l) in Uttar Pradesh; RiwalsarLake (0.8 mg/l) & Khaziar Lake (1.1 mg/l) in Himachal Pradesh and Mansar Lake145
(1.9 mg/l) & Surinsar Lake (2.2 mg/l) in Jammu & Kashmir and Conductivity inMaahil Pond (2716 µmhos/cm) in Uttar Pradesh. BOD is observed in the range of0.3 mg/l to 22 mg/l with highest in Laxmi Pond (22.0 mg/l in Uttar Pradesh. AllLakes & Ponds are exceeding the desired water quality criteria with respect toBOD except Dal Lake in Jammu & Kashmir; Brahmsarovar Lake in Haryana andGobindsarovar Lake in Himachal Pradesh. The Total Coliform and FaecalColiform varies from 14 to 92,000 MPN/100ml and 1 to 30,000 MPN/100mlrespectively. Lakes & ponds having TC and FC more than the desired criteria areLaxmi Pond (92,000 & 17,000 MPN/100ml), Maahil Pond (35,000 & 4700MPN/100ml) & Samarpur Jheel (8100 & 6300 MPN/100ml) in Uttar Pradesh andHarike Lake (50,000 & 30,000 MPN/100ml) in Punjab. The water quality statusof Lakes and Ponds in Haryana, Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir,Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand is presented in Annexure-I Table 19.3.19.5 Water Quality of Lakes, Tanks & Ponds in Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya andTripuraThe respective State Pollution Control Boards carry out the water qualitymonitoring of Lakes, Tanks & Ponds in Assam, Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura.DO varies from 0.4 mg/l to 16.0 mg/l. The high values of DO in Subhagya KundaPond in Assam indicate that these ponds are septic or eutrophicated. DO isobserved lower than the desired criteria in Elangabeel System Pond (0.4 mg/l),Bor Beel (3.3 mg/l), Botodriva Satra Pond & Hardoi Pukhuri (3.4 mg/l),Sivasagar Pond (3.5 mg/l), Goysagar Tank (3.6 mg/l) & Gaurisagar Tank (3.9mg/l) in Assam and Lilong Pukhuri (2.9 mg/l), Kongba Bazar Pond (3.0 mg/l),Kakwa Bazar Pond (3.1 mg/l), Lalambung Pond & Chanam Pukhuri (3.2 mg/l) ,Moidangpok Pond (3.6 mg/l), Langmeidong Pukhuri & Hiranmei Pukhuri (3.7mg/l), Maibam Lokpaching Pond & Nangthem Pukhuri (3.8 mg/l) & LamjaoPukhuri (3.9 mg/l in Manipur whereas all other locations monitored are meetingthe required level of DO. Conductivity is observed higher than the water qualitycriteria at Elangabeel system pond (2740 µmhos/cm) in Assam.BOD is observed in the range of 0.4 mg/l to 50 mg/l. Lakes, Ponds and Tankshaving BOD more than criteria are Elangabeel System Pond (50.0 mg/l),Subhagya Kunda Pond (12.0 mg/l), Bor Pukhuri (11.6 mg/l), Padum Pukhuri &Dighali Pukhuri (11.0 mg/l), Bishnu Puskar Pukhuri (8.8 mg/l), Deepar Beel (8.2mg/l), Rajadinia Pukhuri (8.0 mg/l), Botodriva Satra Pond (7.8 mg/l),GangaPukhuri (6.8 mg/l), Bor Beel (6.7 mg/l), Jaipal Pukhuri (6.2 mg/l), Saran Beel (6.1mg/l), Raja Pukhuri (5.2 mg/l), Mahamaya Mandir Pukhuri (5.0 mg/l), Gala Beel(4.8 mg/l), Gophur Pond (4.6 mg/l), Gaurisagar Pond (4.5 mg/l), Daloni Beel,Baskandi Pond & Hordai Pukhuri (4.2 mg/l), Rajmaw Pukhuri (4.0 mg/l), MerBeel (3.8 mg/l) & Goysagar Tank (3.4 mg/l) in Assam; Kongba Bazar Pond (29.8mg/l), Kakwa Bazar Pond (5.8 mg/l), Pumlen Lake & Lamjao Pukhuri (4.3 mg/l),Langmeidong Pukhuri (4.2 mg/l) & Ngairangbam Pond (4.0 mg/l) in Manipur;Umiam Lake (12.0 mg/l) & Ward Lake (9.0 mg/l) in Meghalaya and Laxmi146
- Page 1:
Monitoring of Indiann National Aqua
- Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTSExecutive SummaryPageI-XIII
- Page 6 and 7:
9.1 Narmada River System9.2 Water Q
- Page 8 and 9:
PageChapter XIX Water Quality of La
- Page 10 and 11:
(E), Varuna, Sai, Gomti, Rapti, Sar
- Page 12:
Purna, Kanhan, Wena, Darna, Nira, P
- Page 16 and 17:
Tapi 10.0 16.0 Decreasing Vel 14.0
- Page 18 and 19:
KeralaOrissaJanunia Talab inMadhya
- Page 20 and 21:
Imphal, Kallai, Puzhackal, Venna &W
- Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 1WATER AVAILABILITY, POLLUT
- Page 24 and 25:
1.1.2 Industrial RequirementAnother
- Page 26 and 27:
Population Stress and water insecur
- Page 28 and 29:
industrial establishments and runof
- Page 30 and 31:
for different uses have been identi
- Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER-IIWATER QUALITY MONITORING
- Page 34 and 35:
Table-2.2 List of Parametersunder N
- Page 36 and 37:
2.4 State/UnionTerritory (UT) Level
- Page 38 and 39:
PUNJAB(TOTAL‐69)•RIVERS :38•L
- Page 40 and 41:
BOD, FC and TC whereas DO, pH and C
- Page 42 and 43:
whereas Conductivity, Nitrate, FC a
- Page 44 and 45:
environment. Water Quality (ground
- Page 46 and 47:
Conductivity, TC and FC is confirmi
- Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.5: SURFACE WATER- Percent V
- Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.7: RIVERS- Percent Violatio
- Page 52 and 53:
Table 2.9: PONDS- Percent Violation
- Page 54 and 55:
Figure 2: Water Quality Trend (BOD,
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.3: Water Quality Trend of
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 3.9: Water Quality Trend of
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 3.15: Water Quality Trend of
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 3.1: Water Quality in Indian
- Page 64 and 65:
Name of theRiverLength (Km)No of Mo
- Page 66 and 67:
Name of theRiverLength (Km)No of Mo
- Page 68 and 69:
Name of theRiverLength (Km)No of Mo
- Page 70 and 71:
4.1 Indus River SystemCHAPTER IVWat
- Page 72 and 73:
FECAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
- Page 74 and 75:
Figure 4.3: Water Quality of River
- Page 76 and 77:
5.1 Ganga River SystemCHAPTER VWate
- Page 78 and 79:
12WATER QUALITY OF RIVER GANGA IN U
- Page 80 and 81:
FAECAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100000100
- Page 82 and 83:
TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100000010
- Page 84 and 85:
CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)1000100101W
- Page 86 and 87:
Figure 5.6: Water Quality of River
- Page 88 and 89:
The availability of water in River
- Page 90 and 91:
The low value of DO (0.0 mg/l) is o
- Page 92 and 93:
CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
- Page 94 and 95:
Burhi Gandak, Harbora, Kamla, Manus
- Page 96 and 97:
The Faecal Coliform value ranges fr
- Page 98 and 99:
CHAPTER VIWater Quality of Rivers i
- Page 100 and 101:
TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)1000001000
- Page 102 and 103:
CHAPTER VII7.1 Mahi River SystemWat
- Page 104 and 105:
TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100WATER Q
- Page 106 and 107:
8.2 Water Quality Monitoring in Sab
- Page 108 and 109:
presented as minimum, maximum and m
- Page 110 and 111:
CHAPTER X10.1 Tapi River SystemWate
- Page 112 and 113:
The water quality of other tributar
- Page 114 and 115:
CHAPTER XIWater Quality of Rivers i
- Page 116 and 117: Conductivity, BOD, Nitrate +Nitrite
- Page 118 and 119: 100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVER MAHANA
- Page 120 and 121: 100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVERR MAHAN
- Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER XIIWater Quality of Rivers
- Page 124 and 125: Figure 12.1: Water Quality of River
- Page 126 and 127: 12.4 Water Quality of River Baitarn
- Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER XIIIWater Quality of Rivers
- Page 130 and 131: B.O.D. (mg/l)8.0WATER QUALITY OF RI
- Page 132 and 133: CHAPTER XIVWater Quality of Rivers
- Page 135 and 136: Figure 14.2: Water Quality of River
- Page 137 and 138: Figure 14.4: Water Quality of River
- Page 139 and 140: CHAPTER XVWater Quality of Rivers i
- Page 141 and 142: Figure 15.1: Water Quality of River
- Page 143 and 144: TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
- Page 145 and 146: BOD ranges from 1.4 to 23.5 mg/l in
- Page 147 and 148: 16.2.1 Water Quality ofRiver Penner
- Page 149 and 150: WATER QUALITY OF RIVER CAUVERY INKA
- Page 151 and 152: CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
- Page 153 and 154: CHAPTER XVIIIWater Quality of Mediu
- Page 155 and 156: 18.4 Water Quality of Medium and Mi
- Page 157 and 158: The water quality monitoring of Riv
- Page 159 and 160: Figure 18.2: Water Quality of River
- Page 161 and 162: 18.8.1 Water Quality of Creeks and
- Page 163 and 164: 19.1 Lantic Water BodiesCHAPTER XIX
- Page 165: DO varies from 0.4 mg/l to 14.3 mg/
- Page 169 and 170: CHAPTER XXAssessment of Groundwater
- Page 171 and 172: 20.6 Status of Ground Water Quality
- Page 173 and 174: Paithan (4.0 mg/ l), TPS Durgapur (
- Page 175 and 176: varies from 356-1015 µmhos/cm and
- Page 177 and 178: SIRSA AT D/S NALAGARH DISTT.HIMACHA
- Page 179 and 180: KOSHI RIVER AT KURSHELA ATBIHAR2565
- Page 181 and 182: POINT OF OIL INDIA LTD.)2065 PAGLDI
- Page 183 and 184: TABLE 11.1 : - WATER QUALITY OF RIV
- Page 185 and 186: TABLE 13.1 :- WATER QUALITY OF RIVE
- Page 187 and 188: 2723RLY BDG, HINGANGHAT 0 0 4WENA A
- Page 189 and 190: MULA AT HARRISON BRIDGE NEAR2194MAH
- Page 191 and 192: DAMANGANGA AT DAMAN JETTY, MOTI DAM
- Page 193 and 194: 2293 R KADALUNDI AT HAJIRAPPALLY KE
- Page 195 and 196: 0 0 8 8GHAGGAR AT U/S DHAKANSU NALL
- Page 197 and 198: CHOUPATHY. 0 0 0 0 326. 29. 28.1928
- Page 199 and 200: 25. 26. 26.1579 ALAPPUZHA KERALA5.6
- Page 201 and 202: BASKANDI POND INSIDE THE2225ASSAM 8
- Page 203 and 204: 22.283 286 285 2.7 3.4 3.051 5 3224
- Page 205 and 206: WELL AT ELOOR, KERALAKERALA26.1924
- Page 207 and 208: AKOT, AKOLA22. 7.82002MAHARASHTRA 2
- Page 209 and 210: OPPOSITE PRIVATE BUS STAND,7.12030A
- Page 211 and 212: 1658NEAR RIVER KUSHABHADRA, PURI,OR