Q ST QUA TAT ALIT US O TY IN OF W N IN WA NDIA ATER A- 2 R ...

whereas Conductivity, Nitrate, FC and TC are confirming to the desired levels as required. WaterQuality of river water data analysis of 604 observations points out that 4 % are not complying topH, 2% are not confirming to BOD whereas DO, Conductivity, FC and TC is confirming to thedesired levels require in riverine environment.Water Quality of lake water data analysis of 52observations points out that 23 % are violating to DO, 10 % are not complying to pH, 29% arenot confirming with BOD whereas Conductivity, FC and TC is confirming with the desiredlevels.2.4.12. JAMMU & KASHMIR - Water Quality (surface water) data analysis of 52 observationspoints out that 12 % are violating to pH, 54% are not confirming to BOD, 8 % are violating toDO whereas Conductivity is confirming to the desired levels require in riverine environment.Water Quality (ground water) data analysis of 4 observations points out that 75 % are notcomplying with pH, 50% are not confirming to BOD whereas Conductivity and Nitrate areconfirming to the desired levels as required. Water Quality of river water data analysis of 43observations points out that 12 % are not complying to pH, 56% are not confirming with BOD, 2% are not complying to DO whereas Conductivity is confirming to the desired levels require inriverine environment.2.4.13. JHARKHAND - Water Quality (surface water) data analysis of 267 observations pointsout that 0.4 % are violating to pH, 19% are not confirming to BOD, 2 % are violating to DOwhereas Conductivity, FC and TC are confirming to the desired levels require in riverineenvironment. Water Quality of river water data analysis of 248 observations points out that 2 %are not complying with DO, 17% are not confirming with BOD whereas pH, conductivity, FCand TC are confirming to the desired levels require in riverine environment. Water Quality oflake water data analysis of 19 observations points out that 5 % are violating to DO and pH, 37%are not confirming with BOD whereas Conductivity, FC and TC is confirming with the desiredlevels.2.4.14. KARNATAKA - Water Quality (surface water) data analysis of 575 observations pointsout that pH is not confirming to 8% and 7% are not complying to TC, out of 574 observations 1% is violating to DO, out of 482 observations 0.2 % is not complying to Conductivity, out of 571observations 11 % is not confirming to BOD whereas out of 570 observations 7% is notcomplying to FC to the desired levels require in riverine environment. Water Quality of riverwater data analysis of 568 observations points out that 1% is not confirming with DO, 7 % arenot complying to pH, 10% are not confirming to BOD, 7% is not confirming with FC and 7% isnot confirming with TC whereas Conductivity is confirming to the desired levels require inriverine environment. Water Quality of lake water data analysis of 7 observations points out that43 % are not complying to pH, 71% are not confirming with BOD whereas DO, Conductivity,FC and TC is confirming to the desired levels.2.4.15. KERALA- Water Quality (surface water) data analysis of 447 observations points outthat 11 % is violating to DO, pH is not confirming to 7%, 10 % is not complying to21