Q ST QUA TAT ALIT US O TY IN OF W N IN WA NDIA ATER A- 2 R ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20.10 Status of Ground Water Quality in Tamil Nadu and PondicherryThe State Pollution Control Board/ Pollution Control Committee carry out thewater quality monitoring of ground water in Pondicherry and Tamil nadu. pH ofgroundwater is observed in the range of 6.0-8.5, pH value 6.0 is observed atKaruvadikuppam, 6.1 at Kalapet, Pondicherry Univ, 6.4 at Thengaithittu areaPondicherry, 6.4 at Kurumbapet. Conductivity varies from 143-3417 µmhos/cm.Conductivity 3417 µmhos/cm is observed at Muthiyalpet area Pondicherry. BODis observed meeting the desired criteria. Nitrate is observed in the range of 0.05-0.55 mg/l. The quality of ground water in Tamil nadu and Pondicherry ispresented in Annexure-I Table 20.8.20.11 Status of Ground Water Quality in Daman and Dadra Nagar HaveliThe water quality monitoring of ground water in Daman is carried out byrespective Pollution Control Committees. pH of groundwater is observed in therange of 7.0-7.5 and meeting the water quality criteria at all monitoring locations.Conductivity varies from 515-2506 µmhos/cm and is meeting the desired criteriaat all locations except at village Dadra (2506 µmhos/cm). BOD is observed highat all the locations and is observed in the range of 6-8 mg/l. nitrate is observed inthe range of 0.3 – 5.1 mg/l. Fluoride concentration is observed in the range of0.01- 0.66 mg/ l The quality of ground water in Daman and Dadra Nagar Haveli,is presented in Annexure-I Table 20.9.20.12 Status of Ground Water Quality in Maharashtra and GoaThe water quality monitoring of ground water in Maharashtra and Goa is carriedout by respective Pollution Control Board. pH of groundwater is observed in therange of 5.8-8.6 in the state of Maharashtra and pH ranges from 5.1-6.5 in Goa,and Maharashtra and is not meeting the water quality criteria at well at KudaiIndustrial estate (5.8), at Zuari Nagar (5.9), at Verna Indl estate (6.2), at PilerneIndl estate (6.2), at Sancoale industrial estate (6.3); well at Korlim Industrialestate (6.3). Conductivity varies from 50-5670 µmhos/cm and is meeting thedesired criteria at all locations except at Malegaon, Taluka- Barmati (5670µmhos/cm); bore well at Katpur near Z.P. School (4970 µmhos/cm); Savali inSangli (4405 µmhos/cm); Rasulwadi- Sambarwadi in Sangli (4306 µmhos/cm);Wahegaon, Zila Parishad School (3885 µmhos/cm); dug well at Sakharali, villSakharali (3819 µmhos/cm). BOD is observed high at MSW site at Raipur (23mg/l); dug well at Gunjalwadi (10.0 mg/l); Burudgaon ( 9.0 mg/l); Sangera inGondia (7.0 mg/l); Koradi (7.0 mg/l); Brahamni , Kamleshwar, Nagpur (7.0 mg/l); Mira Bhayander (5.0 mg/l); MSW site, Sangera, Gondia (7.0 mg/l);Bhandewari, Nagpur (7.0 mg/ l); bore well at Rasegaon (6.0 mg/ l); dug well nearWardha city railway station (6.0 mg/ l); Khapargeda , Nagpur (6.0 mg/ l); Taloja-Raigad; ( 5.0 mg/l ); MSW site, Pathardi Nasik (5.0 mg/l); Gangapur, Aurangabad(5.0 mg/l); Taluka-Solapur (5.0 mg/l); Taluka- Tumsar (5.0 mg/ l); Taluka-Ballarpur (5.0 mg/ l); Shinde village (5.0 mg/ l); Mira –Bhayander (5.0 mg/ l);Village Naregaon, Taluka- Aurangabad (4.0 mg/ l), village Wahagaon, Taluka-151
Paithan (4.0 mg/ l), TPS Durgapur (4.0 mg/ l); taluka-Shirur (4.0 mg/ l); Taluka-Mohul (4.0 mg/ l); bore well at Katpur (4.0mg/ l); Sawargaon, Yavatmal (4.0 mg/l); Dug well at Ranjangaon (4.0 mg/l). The concentration of Nitrate is observed inthe range of 0.1 – 23.5 mg/l. Fluoride concentration is observed in the range of0.03- 1.82 mg/ l. high concentration of Fluoride is observed at B/W at Katpur nearJ P School (1.81 mg/ l); B/W at Bahe railway station, Dahegaon vill (1.8 mg/ l);B/W near Chincholi vill, Solapur dist (1.8 mg/ l); B/W at Shate Vasti, Tuljapurvill, Solapur dist. (1.6 mg/ l). The quality of ground water in Maharashtra and Goais presented in Annexure-I Table 20.10.20.13 Status of Ground Water Quality in GujaratThe water quality monitoring of ground water in Gujarat is carried out by GujaratPollution Control Board. pH of groundwater is observed in the range of 7.6-8.4 inthe state of Gujarat. Conductivity varies from 546-12018 µmhos/cm and ismeeting the desired criteria at all locations except well at Pandesara, Industrial(12018 µmhos/cm); Sachin GIDC (11213 µmhos/cm); Olpad (8406µmhos/cm),water works of Navsari near Dhudia Talav (3542 µmhos/cm); Vadodara (Indl-Nandesari) (2590 µmhos/cm). BOD is observed in the range of 1.0 – 3.0 mg/l.Fluoride concentration is observed in the range of 0.005- 1.15 mg/ l. The value1.15 mg/l of Fluoride is observed at Junagadh. The quality of ground water inGujarat is presented in Annexure-I Table 20.11.20.14 Status of Ground Water Quality in RajasthanThe water quality monitoring of ground water in Rajasthan is carried out by StatePollution Control Board. pH of groundwater is observed in the range of 6.7-8.6and is meeting the water quality criteria all locations except at well at 1 kmJodhpur town (8.6). The conductivity varies from 685-21,500 µmhos/cm and isnot meeting the desired criteria at well at Balotra (21,500 µmhos/cm) ; well atSangaria, Jodhpur (18,300 µmhos/cm); well at village Nandwan, Jodhpur (14,200µmhos/cm); well at Sakrana Bera, Balotra (13200 µmhos/cm); well U/s 1 kmfrom Jodhpur Town (12100 µmhos/cm); well near Bandi river bridge Pali (11,650µmhos/cm); tube well of Girdhari Lal, Bhituja (10,100 µmhos/cm); well of PemaRam mali, Bhituja (9,600 µmhos/cm); well of bhik singh, Sakrana Bera, Balotra(9,450 µmhos/cm); Sh Pol Singh Purohit, Pali (8,850 µmhos/cm); CWR ofPHED, Bhituja (8,150 µmhos/cm); well of Loomji Choudhary, Pali town (u/s1km from Plai town (6600 µmhos/cm);well of Bilma Ram Patel, Salawas, Jodhpur(5,400 µmhos/cm); Near Khanpura Talab, Ajmer (5100 µmhos/cm); VillageVinayakia, Jodhpur (Hukum Singh Rathore (4500 µmhos/cm); well at Birja Ram,Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu (4350 µmhos/cm);well at Bhura Ram, Khetri Nagar,Jhunjhunu (4200 µmhos/cm); opp Private Bus stand, Ajmer well at Bhura Ram,Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu (3950 µmhos/cm); well infront of Singhania Policestation (3850 µmhos/cm);bore well of Rajasthan Housing Board, Bhiwadi (3300µmhos/cm); RICO tube well, Ria, Shahjanpur (3280 µmhos/cm);bore well of Sh.Umesh Kumar, Bhutija (3200 µmhos/cm); Sh. Girdhari Singh Raj Purohit, vill152
Page 1:
Monitoring of Indiann National Aqua
Page 4 and 5:
CONTENTSExecutive SummaryPageI-XIII
Page 6 and 7:
9.1 Narmada River System9.2 Water Q
Page 8 and 9:
PageChapter XIX Water Quality of La
Page 10 and 11:
(E), Varuna, Sai, Gomti, Rapti, Sar
Page 12:
Purna, Kanhan, Wena, Darna, Nira, P
Page 16 and 17:
Tapi 10.0 16.0 Decreasing Vel 14.0
Page 18 and 19:
KeralaOrissaJanunia Talab inMadhya
Page 20 and 21:
Imphal, Kallai, Puzhackal, Venna &W
Page 22 and 23:
CHAPTER 1WATER AVAILABILITY, POLLUT
Page 24 and 25:
1.1.2 Industrial RequirementAnother
Page 26 and 27:
Population Stress and water insecur
Page 28 and 29:
industrial establishments and runof
Page 30 and 31:
for different uses have been identi
Page 32 and 33:
CHAPTER-IIWATER QUALITY MONITORING
Page 34 and 35:
Table-2.2 List of Parametersunder N
Page 36 and 37:
2.4 State/UnionTerritory (UT) Level
Page 38 and 39:
PUNJAB(TOTAL‐69)•RIVERS :38•L
Page 40 and 41:
BOD, FC and TC whereas DO, pH and C
Page 42 and 43:
whereas Conductivity, Nitrate, FC a
Page 44 and 45:
environment. Water Quality (ground
Page 46 and 47:
Conductivity, TC and FC is confirmi
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.5: SURFACE WATER- Percent V
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.7: RIVERS- Percent Violatio
Page 52 and 53:
Table 2.9: PONDS- Percent Violation
Page 54 and 55:
Figure 2: Water Quality Trend (BOD,
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.3: Water Quality Trend of
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Table 3.1: Water Quality in Indian
Page 64 and 65:
Name of theRiverLength (Km)No of Mo
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
4.1 Indus River SystemCHAPTER IVWat
Page 72 and 73:
FECAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
Page 74 and 75:
Figure 4.3: Water Quality of River
Page 76 and 77:
5.1 Ganga River SystemCHAPTER VWate
Page 78 and 79:
12WATER QUALITY OF RIVER GANGA IN U
Page 80 and 81:
FAECAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100000100
Page 82 and 83:
TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100000010
Page 84 and 85:
CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)1000100101W
Page 86 and 87:
Figure 5.6: Water Quality of River
Page 88 and 89:
The availability of water in River
Page 90 and 91:
The low value of DO (0.0 mg/l) is o
Page 92 and 93:
CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
Page 94 and 95:
Burhi Gandak, Harbora, Kamla, Manus
Page 96 and 97:
The Faecal Coliform value ranges fr
Page 98 and 99:
CHAPTER VIWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 100 and 101:
TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)1000001000
Page 102 and 103:
CHAPTER VII7.1 Mahi River SystemWat
Page 104 and 105:
TOTAL COLIFORM(MPN/100ml)100WATER Q
Page 106 and 107:
8.2 Water Quality Monitoring in Sab
Page 108 and 109:
presented as minimum, maximum and m
Page 110 and 111:
CHAPTER X10.1 Tapi River SystemWate
Page 112 and 113:
The water quality of other tributar
Page 114 and 115:
CHAPTER XIWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 116 and 117:
Conductivity, BOD, Nitrate +Nitrite
Page 118 and 119:
100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVER MAHANA
Page 120 and 121:
100000WATER QUALITY OF RIVERR MAHAN
Page 122 and 123: CHAPTER XIIWater Quality of Rivers
Page 124 and 125: Figure 12.1: Water Quality of River
Page 126 and 127: 12.4 Water Quality of River Baitarn
Page 128 and 129: CHAPTER XIIIWater Quality of Rivers
Page 130 and 131: B.O.D. (mg/l)8.0WATER QUALITY OF RI
Page 132 and 133: CHAPTER XIVWater Quality of Rivers
Page 139 and 140: CHAPTER XVWater Quality of Rivers i
Page 143 and 144: TOTAL COLIFORM (MPN/100ml)100001000
Page 145 and 146: BOD ranges from 1.4 to 23.5 mg/l in
Page 147 and 148: 16.2.1 Water Quality ofRiver Penner
Page 149 and 150: WATER QUALITY OF RIVER CAUVERY INKA
Page 151 and 152: CONDUCTIVITY (µmhos/cm)10000100010
Page 153 and 154: CHAPTER XVIIIWater Quality of Mediu
Page 155 and 156: 18.4 Water Quality of Medium and Mi
Page 157 and 158: The water quality monitoring of Riv
Page 161 and 162: 18.8.1 Water Quality of Creeks and
Page 163 and 164: 19.1 Lantic Water BodiesCHAPTER XIX
Page 165 and 166: DO varies from 0.4 mg/l to 14.3 mg/
Page 167 and 168: (1.9 mg/l) & Surinsar Lake (2.2 mg/
Page 169 and 170: CHAPTER XXAssessment of Groundwater
Page 171: 20.6 Status of Ground Water Quality
Page 175 and 176: varies from 356-1015 µmhos/cm and
Page 177 and 178: SIRSA AT D/S NALAGARH DISTT.HIMACHA
Page 179 and 180: KOSHI RIVER AT KURSHELA ATBIHAR2565
Page 181 and 182: POINT OF OIL INDIA LTD.)2065 PAGLDI
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 11.1 : - WATER QUALITY OF RIV
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 13.1 :- WATER QUALITY OF RIVE
Page 187 and 188: 2723RLY BDG, HINGANGHAT 0 0 4WENA A
Page 189 and 190: MULA AT HARRISON BRIDGE NEAR2194MAH
Page 191 and 192: DAMANGANGA AT DAMAN JETTY, MOTI DAM
Page 193 and 194: 2293 R KADALUNDI AT HAJIRAPPALLY KE
Page 195 and 196: 0 0 8 8GHAGGAR AT U/S DHAKANSU NALL
Page 197 and 198: CHOUPATHY. 0 0 0 0 326. 29. 28.1928
Page 199 and 200: 25. 26. 26.1579 ALAPPUZHA KERALA5.6
Page 201 and 202: BASKANDI POND INSIDE THE2225ASSAM 8
Page 203 and 204: 22.283 286 285 2.7 3.4 3.051 5 3224
Page 205 and 206: WELL AT ELOOR, KERALAKERALA26.1924
Page 207 and 208: AKOT, AKOLA22. 7.82002MAHARASHTRA 2
Page 209 and 210: OPPOSITE PRIVATE BUS STAND,7.12030A
Page 211 and 212: 1658NEAR RIVER KUSHABHADRA, PURI,OR
show all

Q ST QUA TAT ALIT US O TY IN OF W N IN WA NDIA ATER A- 2 R ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?