13.07.2015 Views

THE CHRISTIAN AFRIKANERS - The Works of F. N. Lee

THE CHRISTIAN AFRIKANERS - The Works of F. N. Lee

THE CHRISTIAN AFRIKANERS - The Works of F. N. Lee

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

majority <strong>of</strong> the White citizens are pr<strong>of</strong>essedly Christian).Potgieter is also an expert on Calvin. Just before I came here to give these lectures, I learned he isproducing another book to be entitled Calvin for Today. It is a system <strong>of</strong> daily readings for eachday <strong>of</strong> the year.<strong>The</strong> blurb is very interesting. It says: "Order your Biblical Daily Reading Book now for the NewYear! Make Calvin part <strong>of</strong> your life by acquiring this book <strong>of</strong> daily readings, a work in which thegreat Reformed Church Father speaks to us in living Afrikaans, translated from the original Latinand compiled by one <strong>of</strong> the foremost authorities on Calvin, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor F.J.M. Potgieter, Pr<strong>of</strong>essorEmeritus <strong>of</strong> Stellenbosch. <strong>The</strong>se 365 daily readings are a choiceselection <strong>of</strong> Calvin's writteninheritances which, for the most part, are taken from his various writings. <strong>The</strong>y cover a largevariety <strong>of</strong> subjects, e.g. predestination, infant baptism, prayer, our Christian clothing, the right <strong>of</strong>resistance, and God's providence."One <strong>of</strong> the interesting things about Potgieter, is a discussion concerning his Doctoral Dissertationon the relationship between theology and philosophy in the thought <strong>of</strong> John Calvin -- which wasundertaken by Cornelius Van Til in 1940. Van Til said: "Potgieter argues that according toDooyeweerd not revelation but the regenerated heart is posited as the foundation <strong>of</strong> Philosophy."However, Potgieter replied that the fixed foundation <strong>of</strong> special revelation in the Word <strong>of</strong> God maynever be exchanged for the instability and fallibility <strong>of</strong> the still-sinful regenerated heart orregenerated ego.To this criticism <strong>of</strong> Dooyeweerd by Potgieter, Van Til replied in 1940: "Potgieter contends that acomplete and constant submission <strong>of</strong> the regenerated ego is nowhere found because no one isperfect. But surely such a submission does take place in principle, or there would be no moreChristian theology any more than a Christian philosophy. Potgieter apparently desires that theChristian philosopher, instead <strong>of</strong> going directly to the Bible itself, should first come to a competenttheological pr<strong>of</strong>essor for a statement <strong>of</strong> what the Bible has to say to him."Continues Van Til: "Are we then to understand that this is because this theology pr<strong>of</strong>essor,Potgieter, is perfect in degree as well as in principle? If the author had observed the simpledistinction between perfection in principle and perfection in degree, he could not have made theexceedingly serious charge <strong>of</strong> subjectivism against Dooyeweerd."Now it is true Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Potgieter does believe that the Christian Philosopher, in using the Bible atthe theoretical scientific level, needs to consult with the Christian <strong>The</strong>ologian's expert scientificexegesis and systematisation <strong>of</strong> Scripture. That is true. I myself think Potgieter is right in thatstatement, and Van Til perhaps wrong. But Potgieter has never claimed that all Christians, even tounderstand the Bible at a common sense level, need to come to the Christian <strong>The</strong>ologian in order toget his clearance first. For Potgieter emphatically believes in the clarity and perspicuity <strong>of</strong>Scripture.It is interesting that others have agreed with Potgieter against what Van Til said in agreement withDooyeweerd back in 1940. Dooyeweerd, according to Van Til, then constantly subjected theregenerated ego to the Scriptures. To be sure, Dooyeweerd finds in the regenerated ego theimmediate starting point and concentration point <strong>of</strong> philosophy. But, says Van Til, it is the greatvirtue <strong>of</strong> the cosmonomic "Philosophy <strong>of</strong> Law" that Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven insist in all theirwriting that man should regard himself as a creature and a sinner -- and should therefore go to theScriptures in order, in the light <strong>of</strong> them, to search out the meaning <strong>of</strong> the created world.One <strong>of</strong> the later "Potgieter" philosophers in South Africa, a lady called Anna Louise Conradie(Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Philosophy at the University <strong>of</strong> Natal) agrees with Potgieter. She says Van Til has justnot seen the real danger pointed out by Dooyeweerd's critics. If theology is controlled byDooyeweerd's "cosmonomic idea" -- a philosophical creature formulated by Dooyeweerd's

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!