17.07.2015 Views

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.44 A total of 113 <strong>in</strong>-depth <strong>in</strong>terviews, last<strong>in</strong>g around one hour, wereconducted with teach<strong>in</strong>g staff between March <strong>and</strong> June 2005.Respondents were recruited from 30 learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> skills sector providersfrom <strong>the</strong> national LSC provider database. On average, four members ofstaff were <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> each provid<strong>in</strong>g organisation.2.45 Selection of providers was balanced to ensure a spread of cases across<strong>the</strong> English regions. The 30 provider organisations were drawn fromacross <strong>the</strong> sector to reflect <strong>the</strong> proportionate size of each (<strong>in</strong> terms ofnumber of providers):• fur<strong>the</strong>r education (8 providers);• work based learn<strong>in</strong>g (14 providers);• adult <strong>and</strong> community learn<strong>in</strong>g (8 providers).2.46 Interviews were conducted with teach<strong>in</strong>g staff from a range of subjectareas. However, given <strong>the</strong> current policy emphasis on maths <strong>and</strong>science, teachers were disproportionately selected from <strong>the</strong>se subjectareas. The profile of participants by subject area is set out <strong>in</strong> Table 2.17below.Table 2.17: Profile of participants by Subject AreaSubjectNumberScience 28Maths 25O<strong>the</strong>r 59Base: 113 valid respondentsAnalysis2.47 The analysis of <strong>the</strong> qualitative data has been undertaken through us<strong>in</strong>g atext tagg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> retrieval programme, known as MaxQDA. Analysis of<strong>the</strong> data has been conducted through look<strong>in</strong>g at all responses under aspecific <strong>the</strong>me (relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>gs used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terview discussionguide). With<strong>in</strong> this, fur<strong>the</strong>r analysis has looked at responses by thosefrom each of <strong>the</strong> sub-sectors. Notable differences are reported. Where<strong>the</strong>re is no analysis discussed at a sub-sectoral level, <strong>the</strong> observationsmade are generic to <strong>the</strong> post-<strong>16</strong> sector as a whole.22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!