17.07.2015 Views

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.27 Teacher/tra<strong>in</strong>er respondents were asked to specify what measures, ifany, <strong>the</strong>ir organisation had taken to cover vacancies when recruitmenthad not been successful (Table 5.5). The most common response citedwas to use o<strong>the</strong>r staff from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation to cover <strong>the</strong> job role(24%). 11% of respondents cited agency cover <strong>and</strong> different advertis<strong>in</strong>gmediums.Table 5.5: What measures has your organisation taken to cover vacancieswhen recruitment has not been successful?%Use o<strong>the</strong>r staff from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation to cover 24Dropped courses 2Employ someone on fixed-term contract 6Use agency cover 11Use all sorts of different advertis<strong>in</strong>g mediums 11‘Headhunt’ staff from o<strong>the</strong>r organisations 2Increase pay offered for <strong>the</strong> job 3No specific measures taken 8Not applicable – situation never arisen 21O<strong>the</strong>r 7Don’t Know 22Base: All 5492 respondentsSource: YCL/MORI quantitative survey of teach<strong>in</strong>g/tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff, 20055.28 Just over one half of respondents (51%) said that <strong>the</strong> measures taken by<strong>the</strong>ir organisation to cover vacancies when recruitment had not beensuccessful were very or fairly effective (Table 5.6). Approximately onethird of respondents (31%) said <strong>the</strong> measures were fairly or very<strong>in</strong>effective. Qualitative f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs support <strong>the</strong>se results with staff regularlymention<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y have to cover unfilled posts when recruitment isunsuccessful.Table 5.6: How effective or <strong>in</strong>effective are <strong>the</strong>se measures to covervacancies when recruitment has not been successful?%Very effective 13Fairly effective 38Nei<strong>the</strong>r effective nor <strong>in</strong>effective 12Fairly <strong>in</strong>effective 21Very <strong>in</strong>effective 10Don’t know 5Base: 2725 respondents, identify<strong>in</strong>g measures to cover vacanciesSource: YCL/MORI quantitative survey of teach<strong>in</strong>g/tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff, 20055.29 Teachers/tra<strong>in</strong>ers of science (46%), English (49%) <strong>and</strong> maths (49%)were least likely to agree that recruitment measures were effective(Figure 5.3).44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!