Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector
Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector
Recruitment and Retention in the Post-16 Learning and Skills Sector
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5.27 Teacher/tra<strong>in</strong>er respondents were asked to specify what measures, ifany, <strong>the</strong>ir organisation had taken to cover vacancies when recruitmenthad not been successful (Table 5.5). The most common response citedwas to use o<strong>the</strong>r staff from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation to cover <strong>the</strong> job role(24%). 11% of respondents cited agency cover <strong>and</strong> different advertis<strong>in</strong>gmediums.Table 5.5: What measures has your organisation taken to cover vacancieswhen recruitment has not been successful?%Use o<strong>the</strong>r staff from with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation to cover 24Dropped courses 2Employ someone on fixed-term contract 6Use agency cover 11Use all sorts of different advertis<strong>in</strong>g mediums 11‘Headhunt’ staff from o<strong>the</strong>r organisations 2Increase pay offered for <strong>the</strong> job 3No specific measures taken 8Not applicable – situation never arisen 21O<strong>the</strong>r 7Don’t Know 22Base: All 5492 respondentsSource: YCL/MORI quantitative survey of teach<strong>in</strong>g/tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff, 20055.28 Just over one half of respondents (51%) said that <strong>the</strong> measures taken by<strong>the</strong>ir organisation to cover vacancies when recruitment had not beensuccessful were very or fairly effective (Table 5.6). Approximately onethird of respondents (31%) said <strong>the</strong> measures were fairly or very<strong>in</strong>effective. Qualitative f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs support <strong>the</strong>se results with staff regularlymention<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>y have to cover unfilled posts when recruitment isunsuccessful.Table 5.6: How effective or <strong>in</strong>effective are <strong>the</strong>se measures to covervacancies when recruitment has not been successful?%Very effective 13Fairly effective 38Nei<strong>the</strong>r effective nor <strong>in</strong>effective 12Fairly <strong>in</strong>effective 21Very <strong>in</strong>effective 10Don’t know 5Base: 2725 respondents, identify<strong>in</strong>g measures to cover vacanciesSource: YCL/MORI quantitative survey of teach<strong>in</strong>g/tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g staff, 20055.29 Teachers/tra<strong>in</strong>ers of science (46%), English (49%) <strong>and</strong> maths (49%)were least likely to agree that recruitment measures were effective(Figure 5.3).44