05.12.2012 Views

A study of the priority substances of the Water Framework Directive ...

A study of the priority substances of the Water Framework Directive ...

A study of the priority substances of the Water Framework Directive ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPENDIX A<br />

Detection limits and measurement uncertainty<br />

Detection limits and measurement uncertainty<br />

for all <strong>substances</strong> in <strong>the</strong> different relevant sample<br />

matrices are given in <strong>the</strong> table below. The<br />

lower limit <strong>of</strong> detection is determined by several<br />

factors. The most important are sample amount,<br />

clean-up method and instrument sensitivity.<br />

These factors can vary between <strong>the</strong> different<br />

laboratories, matrix types, and even between<br />

different samples <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same type. The detection<br />

limits given in <strong>the</strong> table below are <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

a rough estimate. The measurement uncertainty<br />

<strong>of</strong> a method is determined by <strong>the</strong> used method,<br />

SUBSTANCE<br />

WFD SUBSTANCES:<br />

appendix a ::::::::::..<br />

<strong>the</strong> experience <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laboratory executing <strong>the</strong><br />

method, <strong>the</strong> availability and results <strong>of</strong> intercalibrations<br />

and certified reference materials. Since<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are several different methods for quantifying<br />

measurement uncertainties, <strong>the</strong> uncertainty<br />

is given as rough categories only: good: well<br />

established method with a high frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

intercalibrations and relevant certified materials<br />

available; fair: established method only infrequent<br />

intercalibrations, no major analytical<br />

problems; poor: new method not all analytical<br />

problems solved.<br />

Detection limit<br />

<strong>Water</strong> ng/L Sediment g/kg d.w. Biota g/kg f.w.<br />

Alachlor 2-200 1-10 1-10 fair<br />

Atrazine 1-200 1-10 1-10 fair<br />

Benzene 20-200 10-100 10-100 fair<br />

Brominated diphenyle<strong>the</strong>rs 0,1-50 0,1-50 0,2-100 fair<br />

Cadmium and its compounds 2-10000 30-10000 2-1000 good<br />

C10-13-chloroalkanes (Sum) 1-500 0,3-50 0,3-50 poor<br />

Chlorfenvinphos 4-200 1-10 1-10 fair<br />

Chlorpyrifos 4-200 1-10 1-10 fair<br />

1,2-Dichloroethane 20-200 10-100 10-100 fair<br />

Dichloromethane 20-200 10-100 10-100 fair<br />

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 50 20 40 poor<br />

Diuron 1-20 1-20 1-20 fair<br />

Endosulfan 0,05-10 0,05-10 0,05-10 good<br />

Hexachlorobenzene 0,05-10 0,05-10 0,05-10 good<br />

Hexachlorobutadiene 20-200 10-100 10-100 fair<br />

Hexachlorocyclohexane 0,05-10 0,05-10 0,05-10 good<br />

Isoproturon 1-20 1-20 1-20 fair<br />

Lead and its compounds 10-10000 85-10000 9-10000 good<br />

Mercury and its compounds 2-200 5-200 5-200 good<br />

Nickel and its compounds 50-10000 40-10000 40-10000 good<br />

Nonylphenols 10-20 10-50 10-50 fair<br />

Octylphenols 1-20 1-50 1-50 fair<br />

Pentachlorobenzene 0,05-10 0,05-10 0,05-10 good<br />

Pentachlorophenol 1-20 1-50 1-50 fair<br />

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 0,1-300 0,3-100 0,1-100 good<br />

Anthracene 0,1-300 0,3-100 0,1-100 good<br />

Benzo(a)pyrene 0,1-300 0,3-100 0,1-100 good<br />

Benzo(b)fluoran<strong>the</strong>ne 0,1-300 0,3-100 0,1-100 good<br />

(continued on page 98)<br />

Uncertainty<br />

A <strong>study</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>priority</strong> <strong>substances</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Framework</strong> <strong>Directive</strong><br />

TA-2140/2005<br />

97:::..

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!