08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President 1994 - The American Presidency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

gradually overtake spending growth over <strong>the</strong> next couple <strong>of</strong> years,leading to a slowly increasing saving rate.Finally, foreign economies should recover over <strong>the</strong> next couple <strong>of</strong>years and provide an export lift for U.S. firms. By early 1995, netexports should once again be contributing to U.S. growth ra<strong>the</strong>rthan subtracting from it. Strength in <strong>the</strong>se sectors is expected tomore than <strong>of</strong>fset <strong>the</strong> continued declines in real Federal spendingthat are expected over <strong>the</strong> next 5 years.<strong>The</strong> projected decline in <strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit, from 4.0 percent<strong>of</strong> GDP in fiscal 1993 to about 2.3 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP by fiscal1996, should have benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy that go beyond interestrates. First, with less government "crowding out," more funds willbe available for private business investment. This higher investmentlevel will increase <strong>the</strong> Nation's capital stock and hence increaseits long-run potential output. Second, <strong>the</strong>re is a linkage between<strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit and <strong>the</strong> current account deficit.Because foreign savings have been steadily flowing into <strong>the</strong> UnitedStates to cover <strong>the</strong> imbalance between domestic saving and domesticinvestment, we have been running large capital account surpluses.<strong>The</strong>se in turn have required large current account deficits,because <strong>the</strong> two accounts are mirror images. A steady reduction <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Federal budget deficit, <strong>the</strong>refore, should also translate intosmaller current account deficits.With <strong>the</strong>se developments, GDP growth <strong>of</strong> 2V2 percent to 3 percentper year—in line with 1993 growth—seems likely to continueover <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s (Table 2-2). This growth should be sufficientto reduce <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate steadily from <strong>the</strong> roughly6V2-percent level <strong>of</strong> late 1993 to about 5V2 percent (under <strong>the</strong> oldunemployment definition) by <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> 1998. (Box 3-1 in Chapter3 contains a discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>the</strong> old unemploymentrate, based on <strong>the</strong> historical Current Population Survey,and <strong>the</strong> new unemployment rate, based on <strong>the</strong> revised version <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> survey.) <strong>The</strong>se gains will be paired with healthy increases inreal disposable income, which are as important as job growth to <strong>the</strong><strong>American</strong> worker. After two decades <strong>of</strong> relative stagnation, realwages should post solid gains and allow <strong>American</strong> families onceagain to enjoy steadily improving living standards.Within this macroeconomic environment, short-term interestrates are likely to drift slowly upward over <strong>the</strong> coming years as <strong>the</strong>economy streng<strong>the</strong>ns. Long-term interest rates are not expected toincrease appreciably, however, because inflation should remainsubdued and budget deficits will continue to shrink. Healthy gainsin productivity, <strong>the</strong> mainspring <strong>of</strong> rising living standards, will be<strong>the</strong> key to keeping inflation tame. <strong>The</strong> higher rate <strong>of</strong> business investmentin <strong>the</strong> 1990s than in <strong>the</strong> 1970s and 1980s should keepproductivity on a relatively fast track and prevent unit labor costs91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!