28.08.2015 Views

and Cosmology

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Active Galactic Nuclei<br />

204<br />

Binary QSOs. The connection between the activity of<br />

galaxies <strong>and</strong> the presence of close neighbors is also seen<br />

from the clustering properties of QSOs. In surveys for<br />

gravitational lens systems, pairs of QSO images have<br />

been detected which have angular separations of a few<br />

arcseconds <strong>and</strong> very similar redshifts, but sufficiently<br />

different spectra to exclude them being gravitationally<br />

lensed images of the same source. The number of binary<br />

QSOs thus found is considerably larger than the<br />

expectation from the large-scale correlation function of<br />

QSOs. This conclusion was further strengthened by an<br />

extensive analysis from the QSOs in the Sloan Digital<br />

Sky Survey (see Sect. 8.1.2). The correlation function of<br />

QSOs at separations below ∼ 30h −1 kpc exceeds that of<br />

the extrapolation of the correlation function from larger<br />

scales by a factor of 10 or more. Hence it seems that<br />

the small-scale clustering of QSOs is very much enhanced,<br />

say compared to normal galaxies, which could<br />

be due to the triggering of activity by the proximity<br />

of the neighbor: in this case, both galaxies attain a perturbed<br />

gravitational potential <strong>and</strong> start to become active.<br />

5.4.6 The Black Hole Mass in AGNs<br />

We now return to the determination of the mass of the<br />

central black hole in AGNs. In Sect. 5.3.5, a lower limit<br />

on the mass was derived, based on the fact that the<br />

luminosity of an AGN cannot exceed the Eddington<br />

luminosity. However, this estimate cannot be very precise,<br />

for at least two reasons. The first is related to the<br />

anisotropic appearance of an AGN. The observed flux<br />

can be translated into a luminosity only on the assumption<br />

that the emission from the AGN is isotropic, <strong>and</strong><br />

we have discussed several reasons why this assumption<br />

is not justified in many cases. Second, we do not<br />

have a clear idea what the ratio of AGN luminosity to<br />

its Eddington luminosity is. It is clear that this ratio<br />

can vary a lot between different black holes. For example,<br />

the black hole at the center of our Galaxy could<br />

power a luminosity of several 10 44 erg/s if radiating<br />

with the Eddington luminosity – <strong>and</strong> we know that the<br />

true luminosity is several order of magnitudes below<br />

this value.<br />

M • from Reverberation Mapping. A far more accurate<br />

method for estimating the black hole mass in AGNs<br />

comes from reverberation mapping which we described<br />

in Sect. 5.4.2. The principal quantity that is derived from<br />

this technique is the size r of the BLR for a given atomic<br />

line or for a given ionization state of a chemical element.<br />

Furthermore, the relative line width Δλ/λ can be<br />

measured, <strong>and</strong> can be related to the characteristic velocity<br />

dispersion σ in the BLR, σ = c Δλ/λ. Assuming<br />

that the gas is virialized, or moving on Keplerian orbits<br />

around the black hole, the mass of the latter can be<br />

estimated to be<br />

M • ≈ r σ 2 /G , (5.30)<br />

where the difference between r<strong>and</strong>om motion <strong>and</strong> circular<br />

orbits corresponds to a factor of order 2 in this<br />

estimate. Thus, once reverberation mapping has been<br />

conducted, the black hole mass can be estimated with<br />

very reasonable accuracy.<br />

However, this is a fairly expensive observing technique,<br />

requiring the photometric <strong>and</strong> spectroscopic<br />

monitoring of sources over long periods of time, <strong>and</strong><br />

it can therefore be applied only to relatively small samples<br />

of sources. Furthermore, this technique is restricted<br />

to low-luminosity AGNs, since the size of the BLR, <strong>and</strong><br />

thus the time delay <strong>and</strong> the necessary length of the monitoring<br />

campaign, increases with the black hole mass.<br />

We might therefore want to look at alternative methods<br />

for estimating M • .<br />

M • from Scaling Relations. When applied to a set<br />

of nearby Seyfert 1 galaxies, for which reverberation<br />

mapping has been carried out, one finds that the black<br />

hole mass in these AGNs satisfies the same relation<br />

(3.35) between M • <strong>and</strong> the velocity dispersion σ e of<br />

the bulge as has been obtained for inactive galaxies.<br />

This scaling relation then yields a useful estimate of<br />

the black hole mass from the stellar velocity dispersion.<br />

Unfortunately, even this method cannot be applied to<br />

a broad range of AGNs, since the velocity dispersion of<br />

stars cannot be measured in AGNs which are either too<br />

luminous – since then the nuclear emission outshines<br />

the stellar light, rendering spectroscopy of the latter<br />

impossible – or too distant, so that a spatial separation<br />

of nuclear light from stellar light is no longer possible.<br />

However, another scaling relation was found which<br />

turns out to be very useful <strong>and</strong> which can be extended<br />

to luminous <strong>and</strong> high-redshift sources. The size of the<br />

BLR correlates strongly with the continuum luminos-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!