and Cosmology
Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction
Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5. Active Galactic Nuclei<br />
204<br />
Binary QSOs. The connection between the activity of<br />
galaxies <strong>and</strong> the presence of close neighbors is also seen<br />
from the clustering properties of QSOs. In surveys for<br />
gravitational lens systems, pairs of QSO images have<br />
been detected which have angular separations of a few<br />
arcseconds <strong>and</strong> very similar redshifts, but sufficiently<br />
different spectra to exclude them being gravitationally<br />
lensed images of the same source. The number of binary<br />
QSOs thus found is considerably larger than the<br />
expectation from the large-scale correlation function of<br />
QSOs. This conclusion was further strengthened by an<br />
extensive analysis from the QSOs in the Sloan Digital<br />
Sky Survey (see Sect. 8.1.2). The correlation function of<br />
QSOs at separations below ∼ 30h −1 kpc exceeds that of<br />
the extrapolation of the correlation function from larger<br />
scales by a factor of 10 or more. Hence it seems that<br />
the small-scale clustering of QSOs is very much enhanced,<br />
say compared to normal galaxies, which could<br />
be due to the triggering of activity by the proximity<br />
of the neighbor: in this case, both galaxies attain a perturbed<br />
gravitational potential <strong>and</strong> start to become active.<br />
5.4.6 The Black Hole Mass in AGNs<br />
We now return to the determination of the mass of the<br />
central black hole in AGNs. In Sect. 5.3.5, a lower limit<br />
on the mass was derived, based on the fact that the<br />
luminosity of an AGN cannot exceed the Eddington<br />
luminosity. However, this estimate cannot be very precise,<br />
for at least two reasons. The first is related to the<br />
anisotropic appearance of an AGN. The observed flux<br />
can be translated into a luminosity only on the assumption<br />
that the emission from the AGN is isotropic, <strong>and</strong><br />
we have discussed several reasons why this assumption<br />
is not justified in many cases. Second, we do not<br />
have a clear idea what the ratio of AGN luminosity to<br />
its Eddington luminosity is. It is clear that this ratio<br />
can vary a lot between different black holes. For example,<br />
the black hole at the center of our Galaxy could<br />
power a luminosity of several 10 44 erg/s if radiating<br />
with the Eddington luminosity – <strong>and</strong> we know that the<br />
true luminosity is several order of magnitudes below<br />
this value.<br />
M • from Reverberation Mapping. A far more accurate<br />
method for estimating the black hole mass in AGNs<br />
comes from reverberation mapping which we described<br />
in Sect. 5.4.2. The principal quantity that is derived from<br />
this technique is the size r of the BLR for a given atomic<br />
line or for a given ionization state of a chemical element.<br />
Furthermore, the relative line width Δλ/λ can be<br />
measured, <strong>and</strong> can be related to the characteristic velocity<br />
dispersion σ in the BLR, σ = c Δλ/λ. Assuming<br />
that the gas is virialized, or moving on Keplerian orbits<br />
around the black hole, the mass of the latter can be<br />
estimated to be<br />
M • ≈ r σ 2 /G , (5.30)<br />
where the difference between r<strong>and</strong>om motion <strong>and</strong> circular<br />
orbits corresponds to a factor of order 2 in this<br />
estimate. Thus, once reverberation mapping has been<br />
conducted, the black hole mass can be estimated with<br />
very reasonable accuracy.<br />
However, this is a fairly expensive observing technique,<br />
requiring the photometric <strong>and</strong> spectroscopic<br />
monitoring of sources over long periods of time, <strong>and</strong><br />
it can therefore be applied only to relatively small samples<br />
of sources. Furthermore, this technique is restricted<br />
to low-luminosity AGNs, since the size of the BLR, <strong>and</strong><br />
thus the time delay <strong>and</strong> the necessary length of the monitoring<br />
campaign, increases with the black hole mass.<br />
We might therefore want to look at alternative methods<br />
for estimating M • .<br />
M • from Scaling Relations. When applied to a set<br />
of nearby Seyfert 1 galaxies, for which reverberation<br />
mapping has been carried out, one finds that the black<br />
hole mass in these AGNs satisfies the same relation<br />
(3.35) between M • <strong>and</strong> the velocity dispersion σ e of<br />
the bulge as has been obtained for inactive galaxies.<br />
This scaling relation then yields a useful estimate of<br />
the black hole mass from the stellar velocity dispersion.<br />
Unfortunately, even this method cannot be applied to<br />
a broad range of AGNs, since the velocity dispersion of<br />
stars cannot be measured in AGNs which are either too<br />
luminous – since then the nuclear emission outshines<br />
the stellar light, rendering spectroscopy of the latter<br />
impossible – or too distant, so that a spatial separation<br />
of nuclear light from stellar light is no longer possible.<br />
However, another scaling relation was found which<br />
turns out to be very useful <strong>and</strong> which can be extended<br />
to luminous <strong>and</strong> high-redshift sources. The size of the<br />
BLR correlates strongly with the continuum luminos-