28.08.2015 Views

and Cosmology

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7.4 Evolution of Density Fluctuations<br />

i.e., the integral over the correlation function with<br />

a weight factor depending on k ∼ 2π/L. This relation<br />

can also be inverted, <strong>and</strong> thus ξ(r) can be computed<br />

from P(k).<br />

In general, knowing the power spectrum is not<br />

sufficient to unambiguously describe the statistical<br />

properties of any r<strong>and</strong>om field – in the same way as<br />

the correlation function ξ(r) only provides an incomplete<br />

characterization. However, r<strong>and</strong>om fields do exist,<br />

so-called Gaussian r<strong>and</strong>om fields, which are uniquely<br />

characterized by P(k). Such Gaussian r<strong>and</strong>om fields<br />

play an important role in cosmology because it is assumed<br />

that at very early epochs, the density field obeyed<br />

Gaussian statistics.<br />

7.4 Evolution of Density Fluctuations<br />

P(k) <strong>and</strong> ξ(r) both depend on cosmological time or redshift<br />

because the density field in the Universe evolves<br />

over time. Therefore, the dependence on t is explicitly<br />

written P(k, t) <strong>and</strong> ξ(r, t). Note that P(k, t) is linearly<br />

related to ξ(r, t), according to (7.20), <strong>and</strong> ξ in turn depends<br />

quadratically on the density contrast δ. Ifwe<br />

interpret x as a comoving separation vector, from (7.14)<br />

we then know the time dependence of the density fluctuations,<br />

δ(x, t) = D + (t)δ 0 (x). Thus, within the scope<br />

of the validity of (7.14),<br />

ξ(x, t) = D 2 + (t)ξ(x, t 0), (7.21)<br />

<strong>and</strong> accordingly<br />

P(k, t) = D 2 + (t) P(k, t 0) =: D 2 + (t) P 0(k), (7.22)<br />

where k is a comoving wave number. We shall stress<br />

once again that these relations are valid only in the<br />

framework of Newtonian, linear perturbation theory in<br />

the matter dominated era of the Universe, to which we<br />

had restricted ourselves in Sect. 7.2.2. Equation (7.22)<br />

states that the knowledge of P 0 (k) is sufficient to obtain<br />

the power spectrum P(k, t) at any time, again within the<br />

framework of linear perturbation theory.<br />

7.4.1 The Initial Power Spectrum<br />

The Harrison–Zeldovich Spectrum. Initially it may<br />

seem as if P 0 (k) is a function that can be chosen arbi-<br />

285<br />

trarily, but one objective of cosmology is to calculate<br />

this power spectrum <strong>and</strong> to compare it to observations.<br />

More than thirty years ago, arguments were already<br />

developed to specify the functional form of the initial<br />

power spectrum.<br />

At early times, the expansion of the Universe follows<br />

apowerlaw,a(t) ∝ t 1/2 in the radiation-dominated era.<br />

At that time, no natural length-scale existed in the Universe<br />

to which one might compare a wavelength. The<br />

only mathematical function that depends on a length<br />

but does not contain any characteristic scale is a power<br />

law; 4 hence for very early times one should expect<br />

P(k) ∝ k n s<br />

. (7.23)<br />

Many years ago, Harrison, Zeldovich, Peebles <strong>and</strong> others<br />

argued, based on scaling relations, that it should<br />

be n s = 1. For this reason, the spectrum (7.23) with<br />

n s = 1iscalledHarrison–Zeldovich spectrum. With<br />

such a spectrum, we may choose a time t i after the<br />

inflationary epoch <strong>and</strong> write<br />

P(k, t i ) = D+ 2 (t i) Ak n s<br />

, (7.24)<br />

where A is a normalization constant that cannot be determined<br />

from theory but has to be fixed by observations.<br />

Assuming the validity of (7.22),<br />

P 0 (k) = Ak n s<br />

would then apply.<br />

The Transfer Function. This relation above needs<br />

to be modified for several reasons. In linear perturbation<br />

theory, which led to δ(x, t) = D + (t)δ 0 (x), we<br />

assumed the validity of Newtonian dynamics, considered<br />

only the matter-dominated epoch of the Universe,<br />

<strong>and</strong> disregarded any pressure terms. The evolution of<br />

perturbations in the radiation-dominated cosmos proceeds<br />

differently though, also depending on the scale<br />

of the perturbations in comparison to the length of the<br />

horizon, so that a correction term of the form<br />

P 0 (k) = Ak n s<br />

T 2 (k) (7.25)<br />

4 You can convince yourself of this by trying to find another type of<br />

function of a scale that does not involve a characteristic length; e.g.,<br />

sin x does not work if x is a length, since the sine of a length is not<br />

defined; one thus needs something like sin(x/x 0 ), hence introducing<br />

a length-scale. The same arguments apply to other functions, such<br />

as the logarithm, the exponential, etc. Also note that the sum of two<br />

power laws, e.g., Ax α + Bx β defines a characteristic scale, namely<br />

that value of x where the two terms become equal.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!