and Cosmology
Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction
Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.5 Non-Linear Structure Evolution<br />
of baryons with photons: although matter dominates<br />
the Universe for z < z eq , the density of baryons remains<br />
smaller than that of radiation for a long time,<br />
until after recombination begins. Since photons <strong>and</strong><br />
baryons interact with each other by photon scattering<br />
on free electrons, which again are tightly coupled electromagnetically<br />
to protons <strong>and</strong> helium nuclei, <strong>and</strong> since<br />
radiation cannot fall into the potential wells of dark<br />
matter, baryons are hindered from doing so as well.<br />
Hence, the baryons are subject to radiation pressure.<br />
For this reason, the density distribution of baryons is<br />
initially much smoother than that of dark matter. Only<br />
after recombination does the interaction of baryons with<br />
photons cease to exist, <strong>and</strong> the baryons can fall into the<br />
potential wells of dark matter, i.e., some time later the<br />
distribution of baryons will closely resemble that of the<br />
dark matter.<br />
The linear theory of the evolution of density fluctuations<br />
will break down at the latest when |δ|∼1;<br />
the above equations for the power spectrum P(k, t) are<br />
therefore valid only if the respective fluctuations are<br />
small. However, very accurate fitting formulae now exist<br />
for P(k, t) which are also valid in the non-linear<br />
regime. For some cosmological models, the non-linear<br />
power spectrum is displayed in Fig. 7.6.<br />
7.5 Non-Linear Structure Evolution<br />
Linear perturbation theory has a limited range of applicability;<br />
in particular, the evolution of structures like<br />
clusters of galaxies cannot be treated within the framework<br />
of linear perturbation theory. One might imagine<br />
that one can evolve the system of equations (7.2)–(7.4)<br />
to higher orders in the small variables δ <strong>and</strong> |u|, <strong>and</strong> so<br />
consider a non-linear perturbation theory. In fact, a quite<br />
extensive literature exists on this topic in which such<br />
calculations have been performed. It is worth mentioning,<br />
though, that while this higher-order perturbation<br />
theory indeed allows us to follow density fluctuations<br />
to slightly larger values of |δ|, the achievements of this<br />
theory do not, in general, justify the large mathematical<br />
effort. In addition, the fluid approximation is no longer<br />
valid if gravitationally bound systems form because, as<br />
mentioned earlier, multiple steams of matter will occur<br />
in this case.<br />
However, for some interesting limiting cases, analytical<br />
descriptions exist which are able to represent<br />
the non-linear evolution of the mass distribution in the<br />
Universe. We shall now investigate a special <strong>and</strong> very<br />
important case of such a non-linear model. In general,<br />
studying the non-linear structure evolution requires<br />
the use of numerical methods. Therefore, we will also<br />
discuss some aspects of such numerical simulations.<br />
7.5.1 Model of Spherical Collapse<br />
We consider a spherical region in an exp<strong>and</strong>ing Universe,<br />
with its density ρ(t) enhanced compared to the<br />
mean cosmic density ρ(t),<br />
ρ(t) = [1 + δ(t)] ρ(t), (7.30)<br />
where we use the density contrast δ as defined in (7.1).<br />
For reasons of simplicity we assume that the density<br />
within the sphere is homogeneous although, as we will<br />
later see, this is not really a restriction. The density<br />
perturbation is assumed to be small for small t, so that<br />
it will grow linearly at first, δ(t) ∝ D + (t), as long as<br />
δ ≪ 1. If we consider a time t i which is sufficiently<br />
early such that δ(t i ) ≪ 1, then δ(t i ) = δ 0 D + (t i ), where<br />
δ 0 is the density contrast linearly extrapolated to the<br />
present day. It should be mentioned once again that<br />
δ 0 ̸= δ(t 0 ), because the latter is determined by the nonlinear<br />
evolution.<br />
Let R com be the initial comoving radius of the overdense<br />
sphere; as long as δ ≪ 1, the comoving radius will<br />
change only marginally. The mass within this sphere is<br />
M = 4π 3 R3 com ρ 0 (1 + δ i ) ≈ 4π 3 R3 com ρ 0 , (7.31)<br />
because the physical radius is R = aR com , <strong>and</strong><br />
ρ = ρ 0 /a 3 . This means that a unique relation exists between<br />
the initial comoving radius <strong>and</strong> the mass of this<br />
sphere, independent of the choice of t i <strong>and</strong> δ 0 , if only<br />
we choose δ(t i ) = δ 0 D + (t i ) ≪ 1.<br />
Due to the enhanced gravitational force, the sphere<br />
will exp<strong>and</strong> slightly more slowly than the Universe as<br />
a whole, which again will lead to an increase in its density<br />
contrast. This then decelerates the expansion rate<br />
even further, relative to the cosmic expansion rate. Indeed,<br />
the equations of motion for the radius of the sphere<br />
are identical to the Friedmann equations for the cosmic<br />
expansion, only with the sphere having an effective Ω m<br />
289