28.08.2015 Views

and Cosmology

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.5 Non-Linear Structure Evolution<br />

of baryons with photons: although matter dominates<br />

the Universe for z < z eq , the density of baryons remains<br />

smaller than that of radiation for a long time,<br />

until after recombination begins. Since photons <strong>and</strong><br />

baryons interact with each other by photon scattering<br />

on free electrons, which again are tightly coupled electromagnetically<br />

to protons <strong>and</strong> helium nuclei, <strong>and</strong> since<br />

radiation cannot fall into the potential wells of dark<br />

matter, baryons are hindered from doing so as well.<br />

Hence, the baryons are subject to radiation pressure.<br />

For this reason, the density distribution of baryons is<br />

initially much smoother than that of dark matter. Only<br />

after recombination does the interaction of baryons with<br />

photons cease to exist, <strong>and</strong> the baryons can fall into the<br />

potential wells of dark matter, i.e., some time later the<br />

distribution of baryons will closely resemble that of the<br />

dark matter.<br />

The linear theory of the evolution of density fluctuations<br />

will break down at the latest when |δ|∼1;<br />

the above equations for the power spectrum P(k, t) are<br />

therefore valid only if the respective fluctuations are<br />

small. However, very accurate fitting formulae now exist<br />

for P(k, t) which are also valid in the non-linear<br />

regime. For some cosmological models, the non-linear<br />

power spectrum is displayed in Fig. 7.6.<br />

7.5 Non-Linear Structure Evolution<br />

Linear perturbation theory has a limited range of applicability;<br />

in particular, the evolution of structures like<br />

clusters of galaxies cannot be treated within the framework<br />

of linear perturbation theory. One might imagine<br />

that one can evolve the system of equations (7.2)–(7.4)<br />

to higher orders in the small variables δ <strong>and</strong> |u|, <strong>and</strong> so<br />

consider a non-linear perturbation theory. In fact, a quite<br />

extensive literature exists on this topic in which such<br />

calculations have been performed. It is worth mentioning,<br />

though, that while this higher-order perturbation<br />

theory indeed allows us to follow density fluctuations<br />

to slightly larger values of |δ|, the achievements of this<br />

theory do not, in general, justify the large mathematical<br />

effort. In addition, the fluid approximation is no longer<br />

valid if gravitationally bound systems form because, as<br />

mentioned earlier, multiple steams of matter will occur<br />

in this case.<br />

However, for some interesting limiting cases, analytical<br />

descriptions exist which are able to represent<br />

the non-linear evolution of the mass distribution in the<br />

Universe. We shall now investigate a special <strong>and</strong> very<br />

important case of such a non-linear model. In general,<br />

studying the non-linear structure evolution requires<br />

the use of numerical methods. Therefore, we will also<br />

discuss some aspects of such numerical simulations.<br />

7.5.1 Model of Spherical Collapse<br />

We consider a spherical region in an exp<strong>and</strong>ing Universe,<br />

with its density ρ(t) enhanced compared to the<br />

mean cosmic density ρ(t),<br />

ρ(t) = [1 + δ(t)] ρ(t), (7.30)<br />

where we use the density contrast δ as defined in (7.1).<br />

For reasons of simplicity we assume that the density<br />

within the sphere is homogeneous although, as we will<br />

later see, this is not really a restriction. The density<br />

perturbation is assumed to be small for small t, so that<br />

it will grow linearly at first, δ(t) ∝ D + (t), as long as<br />

δ ≪ 1. If we consider a time t i which is sufficiently<br />

early such that δ(t i ) ≪ 1, then δ(t i ) = δ 0 D + (t i ), where<br />

δ 0 is the density contrast linearly extrapolated to the<br />

present day. It should be mentioned once again that<br />

δ 0 ̸= δ(t 0 ), because the latter is determined by the nonlinear<br />

evolution.<br />

Let R com be the initial comoving radius of the overdense<br />

sphere; as long as δ ≪ 1, the comoving radius will<br />

change only marginally. The mass within this sphere is<br />

M = 4π 3 R3 com ρ 0 (1 + δ i ) ≈ 4π 3 R3 com ρ 0 , (7.31)<br />

because the physical radius is R = aR com , <strong>and</strong><br />

ρ = ρ 0 /a 3 . This means that a unique relation exists between<br />

the initial comoving radius <strong>and</strong> the mass of this<br />

sphere, independent of the choice of t i <strong>and</strong> δ 0 , if only<br />

we choose δ(t i ) = δ 0 D + (t i ) ≪ 1.<br />

Due to the enhanced gravitational force, the sphere<br />

will exp<strong>and</strong> slightly more slowly than the Universe as<br />

a whole, which again will lead to an increase in its density<br />

contrast. This then decelerates the expansion rate<br />

even further, relative to the cosmic expansion rate. Indeed,<br />

the equations of motion for the radius of the sphere<br />

are identical to the Friedmann equations for the cosmic<br />

expansion, only with the sphere having an effective Ω m<br />

289

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!