28.08.2015 Views

and Cosmology

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.5 Non-Linear Structure Evolution<br />

Indeed, this can be expected because clusters of galaxies<br />

contain substructure, visible in the form of the cluster<br />

galaxies. In the upper part of Fig. 7.17, the simulation of<br />

a cluster <strong>and</strong> its substructure is displayed. Indeed, this<br />

mass distribution looks just like the mass distribution<br />

expected in a cluster of galaxies, with the main cluster<br />

halo <strong>and</strong> its distribution of member galaxies. The<br />

lower part of Fig. 7.17 shows the simulation of a halo<br />

with mass ∼ 2 × 10 12 M ⊙ , which corresponds to a massive<br />

galaxy. As one can easily see, its mass distribution<br />

shows a large number of sub-halos as well. In fact, the<br />

two mass distributions are nearly indistinguishable, ex-<br />

303<br />

Fig. 7.18. Number density of sub-halos as a function of their<br />

mass. The mass is expressed by the corresponding Keplerian<br />

rotational velocity v c , measured in units of the corresponding<br />

rotational velocity of the main halo. The curves show this<br />

number density of sub-halos with rotational velocity ≥ v c for<br />

a halo of either cluster mass or galaxy mass. The observed<br />

numbers of sub-halos (i.e., of galaxies) in the Virgo Cluster<br />

are plotted as open circles with error bars, <strong>and</strong> the number<br />

of satellite galaxies of the Milky Way as filled circles. One<br />

can see that the simulations describe the abundance of cluster<br />

galaxies quite well, but around the Galaxy significantly fewer<br />

satellite galaxies exist than predicted by a CDM model<br />

Fig. 7.17. Density distribution of two simulated dark matter<br />

halos. In the top image, the halo has a virial mass of<br />

5 × 10 14 M ⊙ , corresponding to a cluster of galaxies. The halo<br />

in the bottom image has a mass of 2 × 10 12 M ⊙ , representing<br />

a massive galaxy. In both cases, the presence of substructure<br />

in the mass distribution can be seen. It can be identified with<br />

individual cluster galaxies in the case of the galaxy cluster.<br />

The substructure in a galaxy can not be identified easily with<br />

any observable source population; one may expect that these<br />

are satellite galaxies, but observations show that these are considerably<br />

less abundant than the substructure seen here. Apart<br />

from the length-scale (<strong>and</strong> thus also the mass-scale), both<br />

halos appear very similar from a qualitative point of view<br />

cept for their scaling in the total mass. 8 The presence<br />

of substructure over a very wide range in mass is a direct<br />

consequence of hierarchical structure formation,<br />

in which objects of higher mass each contain smaller<br />

structures that have been formed earlier in the cosmic<br />

evolution.<br />

Whereas this substructure in clusters is easily identified<br />

with the cluster member galaxies, the question<br />

arises as to what the sub-halos in galaxies can possibly<br />

correspond to. These show a broad mass spectrum, as<br />

displayed in Fig. 7.18. Some of these sub-halos are rec-<br />

8 The reason for this is found in the property of the power spectrum<br />

of density fluctuations that has been discussed in Sect. 7.5.2, namely<br />

that P(k) can be approximated by a power law over a wide range in k.<br />

Such a power law features no characteristic scale. For this reason,<br />

the properties of halos of high <strong>and</strong> low mass are scale-invariant, as is<br />

clearly visible in Fig. 7.17.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!