28.08.2015 Views

and Cosmology

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology: An Introduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6. Clusters <strong>and</strong> Groups of Galaxies<br />

262<br />

model is fitted to the most prominent lensed images<br />

in the observation, i.e., either giant arcs or clearly recognizable<br />

multiple images. In general, this model then<br />

predicts further images of the source producing the arc.<br />

Close to these predicted positions, these additional images<br />

are then searched for, utilizing the morphology of<br />

the light distribution <strong>and</strong> the color. If this initial model<br />

describes the overall mass distribution quite well, such<br />

images are found. The exact positions of the new images<br />

provide further constraints on the lens model which<br />

is then refined accordingly. Again, the new model will<br />

predict further multiple image systems, <strong>and</strong> so on. By<br />

this procedure, very detailed models can sometimes be<br />

obtained. Since the lens properties of a cluster depend<br />

on the distance or the redshift of the source, the redshift<br />

of lensed sources can be predicted from the identification<br />

of multiple image systems in clusters if a detailed<br />

mass model is available. These predictions can then be<br />

verified by spectroscopic analysis, <strong>and</strong> the success of<br />

this method gives us some confidence in the accuracy<br />

of the lens models.<br />

Fig. 6.32. Distortions by the lens effect of an elliptical potential,<br />

as a function of the source position. The first panel shows<br />

the source itself. The second panel displays ten positions of<br />

the source in the source plane (numbered from 1 to 10) relative<br />

to the center of the lens; the solid curves show the inner<br />

<strong>and</strong> outer caustics. The remaining panels (numbered from 1 to<br />

10) show the inner <strong>and</strong> outer critical curves <strong>and</strong> the resulting<br />

images of the source<br />

profile within the radii at which arcs are found, or the<br />

ellipticity of the mass distribution <strong>and</strong> its substructure.<br />

Figure 6.33 shows two clusters of galaxies which<br />

contain several arcs. For a long time, A 2218 was the<br />

classic example of the existence of numerous arcs in<br />

a single galaxy cluster. Then after the installation of<br />

the ACS camera on-board HST in 2002, a spectacular<br />

image of the cluster A 1689 was obtained in which<br />

more than 100 arcs <strong>and</strong> multiple images were identified.<br />

Several sections of this image are shown in Fig. 6.34.<br />

For clusters of galaxies with such a rich inventory of<br />

lens phenomena, very detailed mass models can be<br />

constructed.<br />

Such mass models have predictive power, allowing<br />

an iterative modeling process. An initial simple mass<br />

Results. We can summarize the most important results<br />

of the examination of clusters using arcs <strong>and</strong> multiple<br />

images as follows: the mass of galaxy clusters is<br />

indeed much larger than the mass of their luminous<br />

matter. The lensing method yields a mass which is in<br />

very good agreement with mass estimates from the X-<br />

ray method or from dynamical methods. However, the<br />

core radius of clusters, i.e., the scale on which the mass<br />

profile flattens inwards, is significantly smaller than determined<br />

from X-ray observations. A typical value is<br />

r c ∼ 30h −1 kpc, in contrast to ∼ 150h −1 kpc from the<br />

X-ray method. This difference leads to a discrepancy<br />

in the mass determination between the two methods on<br />

scales below ∼ 200h −1 kpc. We emphasize that, at least<br />

in principle, the mass determination based on arcs <strong>and</strong><br />

multiple images is substantially more accurate because<br />

it does not require any assumptions about the symmetry<br />

of the mass distribution, about hydrostatic equilibrium<br />

of the X-ray gas, or about an isothermal temperature<br />

distribution. On the other h<strong>and</strong>, the lens effect measures<br />

the mass in cylinders because the lens equation<br />

contains only the projected mass distribution, whereas<br />

the X-ray method determines the mass inside spheres.<br />

The conversion between the two methods introduces<br />

uncertainties, in particular for clusters which deviate

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!