financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB
financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB
financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The discount rates used were determined based on the weighted average<br />
cost of capital, taking into account market interest rates, as well as a debt<br />
ratio, beta <strong>and</strong> average equity risk premium based on historical data.<br />
The equity risk premium used for <strong>2011</strong> was 5%, unchanged from 2010.<br />
Specifi c equity risk premiums ranging from 0.5% to 4.0% were applied to<br />
the Group’s different CGUs, according to their size, region <strong>and</strong> other specifi c<br />
characteristics.<br />
Impairment tests in <strong>2011</strong> were generally based on a 2012 budget similar to<br />
the budget for <strong>2011</strong>.<br />
The All-Clad CGU – including the trademark for €111.8 million <strong>and</strong> goodwill for<br />
€51 million at 31 December <strong>2011</strong> – was tested for impairment by comparing<br />
its carrying amount with its value in use. The value in use calculation was<br />
performed based on the sum of discounted future cash fl ows expected to<br />
be derived from the assets concerned as contained in the fi ve-year business<br />
plan as well as a terminal value determined by extrapolating the cash fl ows<br />
forecast for the last year of the plan. The main actuarial assumptions used<br />
were as follows:<br />
� a discount rate of 9%, marginally up on the 8.83% used in 2010 (9.02%<br />
in 2009), refl ecting a slight widening of debt spreads; <strong>and</strong><br />
� a long-term growth rate of 3%, in line with forecasts for the premium<br />
household equipment market, similar to the rate used since All-Clad was<br />
acquired.<br />
This test led to the recognition of a €7.2 million impairment loss against All-<br />
Clad’s goodwill, in addition to the €35.1 million aggregate impairment loss<br />
already recorded at 31 December 2010, refl ecting the fact that despite the<br />
marked turnaround in All-Clad’s performance in the second half of <strong>2011</strong> –<br />
particularly in terms of sales <strong>and</strong> margins – the entity’s current results are<br />
still slightly lower than expected.<br />
The sensitivity of the impairment test results to changes in the individual<br />
assumptions used at end-<strong>2011</strong> to determine the value in use of the All-Clad<br />
CGU is as follows:<br />
� a 0.5- <strong>and</strong> 1-point increase in the discount rate would result in an additional<br />
goodwill impairment loss of €11.6 million <strong>and</strong> €21.5 million, respectively;<br />
� a 1-point decrease in the growth rate to perpetuity would result in an<br />
additional impairment loss of €15.9 million;<br />
� a 1-point decrease in operating result from activity (formerly “Operating<br />
margin”) in the last year of the business plan – used to calculate<br />
terminal value – would result in an additional goodwill impairment loss<br />
of €7.2 million;<br />
� as regards the sales trends for 2012-2016, Group management currently<br />
considers the most probable scenario to be based on average annual<br />
growth of 5.5%. Compared to these forecasts, a 10% downward revision<br />
of forecast sales over the entire period would result in an additional<br />
goodwill impairment loss of €20.0 million.<br />
Financial Report <strong>and</strong> Registration Document <strong>2011</strong><br />
5<br />
Consolidated fi nancial statements<br />
Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements<br />
Goodwill impairment losses in an aggregate amount of €3.2 million were<br />
also recorded in <strong>2011</strong> for Greece <strong>and</strong> Vietnam.<br />
The carrying amounts of the “Mirro WearEver” br<strong>and</strong>s (Mirro, WearEver<br />
<strong>and</strong> AirBake) totalled an aggregate €4.7 million at 31 December <strong>2011</strong>. The<br />
impairment test performed at that date on the CGU containing these br<strong>and</strong>s<br />
did not result in the recognition of any impairment losses in addition to<br />
those already recorded. The main actuarial assumptions used for the <strong>2011</strong><br />
impairment test on this CGU were as follows:<br />
� a discount rate after tax of 8.83%;<br />
� a long-term growth rate of 2%.<br />
A 1-point increase in the discount rate or a 5% downward revision of forecast<br />
sales for 2012-2016 would result in the carrying amount of the br<strong>and</strong>s being<br />
written down in full.<br />
Impairment tests on other trademarks <strong>and</strong> goodwill in <strong>2011</strong>, 2010 <strong>and</strong> 2009<br />
did not result in the recognition of any impairment losses.<br />
The carrying amount of the Supor CGU – including the br<strong>and</strong> for €99 million<br />
<strong>and</strong> goodwill for €351.2 million – was compared with its market value at<br />
31 December <strong>2011</strong>, as ZJ Supor is listed on the Shenzen stock exchange<br />
<strong>and</strong> there is a liquid market for its shares. At 31 December <strong>2011</strong>, Supor’s<br />
share price was RMB 16.7, compared with a carrying amount of RMB 14.3.<br />
The Arno, Lagostina, Rowenta, Panex, Krups <strong>and</strong> Moulinex trademarks<br />
– which were carried in the balance sheet at 31 December <strong>2011</strong> at<br />
€35.0 million, €30.4 million, €23.2 million, €11.07 million, €7.8 million <strong>and</strong><br />
€1.0 million respectively – were tested by discounting estimated future royalty<br />
revenues from the licensing of the trademarks. The main assumptions used<br />
in <strong>2011</strong> were as follows:<br />
� a royalty rate of between 2% <strong>and</strong> 5.5%, unchanged from 2010 <strong>and</strong> 2009;<br />
� a post-tax discount rate of between 8.1% (Rowenta) <strong>and</strong> 13.92% (Arno),<br />
versus 7.81%-14.56% in 2010;<br />
� a long-term growth rate of between 1% <strong>and</strong> 3%, unchanged from 2010<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2009.<br />
For all of these assets, the sensitivity of value in use to different scenarios was<br />
analysed for the period between <strong>2011</strong> <strong>and</strong> 2015, including their sensitivity<br />
to a one-point increase in the discount rate <strong>and</strong> one-point decrease in the<br />
growth rate to perpetuity. The decreases in value in use under each of these<br />
simulations would not result in the recognition of any impairment losses<br />
on the trademarks concerned in the balance sheet. The test margin on the<br />
Lagostina br<strong>and</strong> would be reduced to zero if the current 2012-2016 sales<br />
forecasts were reduced by 25%.<br />
GROUPE <strong>SEB</strong><br />
5<br />
103