07.12.2012 Views

financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB

financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB

financial report and registration document 2011 - Groupe SEB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� respect for rules governing division of responsibilities;<br />

� policies applying to insurance cover <strong>and</strong> hedging;<br />

� fi nancial <strong>report</strong>ing audit principles.<br />

The risk analysis <strong>and</strong> internal control processes use two basic tools:<br />

� an annual “top-down” review <strong>and</strong> analysis of the main risks. In <strong>2011</strong>, the<br />

members of the Group Executive Committee, the Director of Legal Affairs,<br />

the Director of IT Systems, the Director of Quality, the President in charge<br />

of Innovation, the President in charge of Strategy, the Presidents of the<br />

three core business units <strong>and</strong> the President for China were interviewed<br />

individually to help identify <strong>and</strong> analyse the top ten risks that <strong>Groupe</strong> <strong>SEB</strong><br />

is or could be exposed to. Each risk was evaluated in terms of probability<br />

<strong>and</strong> impact, <strong>and</strong> actions to mitigate each risk were identifi ed. This resulted<br />

in the annual map of risks faced by <strong>Groupe</strong> <strong>SEB</strong>;<br />

� a “bottom-up” process involving self-assessment questionnaires, based<br />

on processes. These are sent out to each operational entity <strong>and</strong> are<br />

designed to identify possible weak points <strong>and</strong> encourage the practice<br />

of internal control at all levels, with a view to making Group operations<br />

more effi cient.<br />

Internal control participants<br />

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE AUDIT<br />

COMMITTEE AND THE NOMINATIONS<br />

AND REMUNERATION COMMITTEE<br />

The role of these bodies is described in the “Organisation <strong>and</strong> Operation of<br />

the Board of Directors” section, pages 26, 27 <strong>and</strong> 28.<br />

GROUP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND GROUP<br />

MANAGEMENT BOARD<br />

Their role is described in the “Group Management Bodies” section, page 29.<br />

THE INTERNAL AUDIT DEPARTMENT<br />

Internal audit, as defined by professional st<strong>and</strong>ards, consists of<br />

“an independent <strong>and</strong> objective process which ensures that the Group has<br />

adequate control of its operations <strong>and</strong> which offers advice on improving the<br />

latter while contributing to added value. The internal audit function helps the<br />

Group to achieve its objectives by systematically <strong>and</strong> methodically evaluating<br />

its risk management, control <strong>and</strong> corporate governance procedures, <strong>and</strong><br />

through recommendations for their improvement.”<br />

The role of the <strong>Groupe</strong> <strong>SEB</strong> Internal Audit department is fully consistent<br />

with this approach.<br />

The Internal Audit department is responsible for evaluating, at all locations<br />

where the Group is established <strong>and</strong> for all functions, compliance with Group<br />

Internal Rules <strong>and</strong> procedures <strong>and</strong> any non-compliance with legislation, <strong>and</strong><br />

for ensuring that Group assets are protected. It is also required to evaluate<br />

the effi cient conduct of operations <strong>and</strong> to ensure that all business risks are<br />

anticipated <strong>and</strong> controlled.<br />

Financial Report <strong>and</strong> Registration Document <strong>2011</strong><br />

2<br />

Corporate governance<br />

Chairman’s <strong>report</strong> on internal control<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, the self-assessment process was completed as in previous years,<br />

with one questionnaire every two years for each Group entity.<br />

Added to these two methods of evaluation are internal audits of all entities<br />

<strong>and</strong> of all the Group’s functions, as well as the annual <strong>and</strong> half-yearly reviews<br />

carried out by the Statutory auditors.<br />

In <strong>2011</strong>, the Internal Audit department carried out missions at 12 market<br />

companies representing 29% of the Group’s sales, <strong>and</strong> at three plants,<br />

representing 32% of Group production, <strong>and</strong> it analysed fi ve Group processes.<br />

The crisis management system, established in 2010, was put into action<br />

in <strong>2011</strong> in response to the natural disasters in Japan <strong>and</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Improvements were made to the system based on these real-life situations.<br />

The parties involved underwent new training <strong>and</strong> are now equipped with<br />

additional <strong>document</strong>s that prepare them to deal with specifi c issues.<br />

In the area of risk management, the Internal Audit department draws up a<br />

map of high-level risks.<br />

Based on this map, on the self-assessment questionnaires <strong>and</strong> on the<br />

principle of an audit in each entity every three or four years, the Audit<br />

department proposes an internal audit plan for the following year.<br />

This plan is submitted to the Audit Committee.<br />

Each internal audit – adapted to circumstances <strong>and</strong> conducted locally by<br />

an average of three Auditors over a two-week period – gives rise to an audit<br />

<strong>report</strong> which is sent to the audited structures <strong>and</strong> their upline management,<br />

to the members of the Group Executive Committee <strong>and</strong> to the Group<br />

Chairman <strong>and</strong> CEO, describing the basic organisation of each process <strong>and</strong><br />

making recommendations.<br />

Steps are then taken by operational management to remedy identifi ed<br />

shortcomings in internal control, <strong>and</strong> to make any other necessary<br />

improvements. The implementation of resulting action plans is subjected to<br />

a systematic internal audit review within 12 months of the audit.<br />

The results of these audits are compared with the results of the selfassessments,<br />

thus completing the full circle of the internal control process.<br />

In order to ensure continuous improvement of internal control <strong>and</strong> Company<br />

effi ciency, the main recommendations issued by the Audit department for<br />

each process are shared annually with the Group Management Committee<br />

for the main Group divisions: Purchasing, IT, Quality, Finance, Human<br />

Resources, Supply Chain, Production, After-sales Service <strong>and</strong> Marketing.<br />

The Internal Audit department draws up an annual <strong>report</strong> of work done which<br />

is presented to the Group Executive Committee <strong>and</strong> the Audit Committee.<br />

The Audit Committee reviews the resources needed by the Internal<br />

Audit department to carry out its work, <strong>and</strong> makes observations or<br />

recommendations as required. The Internal Audit department has a staff<br />

of ten people.<br />

GROUPE <strong>SEB</strong><br />

2<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!