08.12.2012 Views

Myth, Protest and Struggle in Okinawa

Myth, Protest and Struggle in Okinawa

Myth, Protest and Struggle in Okinawa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

K<strong>in</strong> Bay <strong>and</strong> Shiraho 131<br />

one of the Gulf facilities, more than 190 tons of crude oil leaked <strong>and</strong> polluted<br />

the entire K<strong>in</strong> Bay area, kill<strong>in</strong>g white squid, shellfish, <strong>and</strong> other local fish, <strong>and</strong><br />

threaten<strong>in</strong>g people who lived by fish<strong>in</strong>g (Yoshida et al. 1975: 5). In the K<strong>in</strong> Bay<br />

area, the pro-<strong>in</strong>dustry local political leaders clashed with the residents’ opposition<br />

groups, especially those who were reliant on fish<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In the same month, residents of Miyagi Isl<strong>and</strong> (Map 8.1) formed the Miyagi<br />

Isl<strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Protection Society (Miyagijima Tochi o Mamoru Kai), <strong>and</strong> successfully<br />

fended off Arabia Sekiyu’s (Arabia Oil) CTS construction, despite the approval of<br />

the Miyagi Isl<strong>and</strong>’s economic development committee. 8<br />

Subsequently, the nearby Yonagusuku Village Council supported the l<strong>and</strong>fill<br />

plan of the CTS construction by Mitsubishi Kaihatsu. In September 1972, the Yara<br />

prefecture government authorized Mitsubishi’s l<strong>and</strong> reclamation of 640,000 tsubo<br />

(2.1 million square metres) between Henza <strong>and</strong> Miyagi isl<strong>and</strong>s. The l<strong>and</strong>fill work<br />

started the follow<strong>in</strong>g month.<br />

In September 1973, the anti-CTS local residents of a mostly fish<strong>in</strong>g population<br />

formed the K<strong>in</strong> Bay Protection Society (K<strong>in</strong>wan o Mamoru Kai). The K<strong>in</strong> Bay<br />

Protection Society repeatedly visited the prefecture government <strong>and</strong> Mitsubishi,<br />

dem<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g a stop to the l<strong>and</strong>fill work, <strong>and</strong> protest<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st the CTS construction<br />

<strong>in</strong> the area. In September 1974, six fish<strong>in</strong>g villagers <strong>in</strong> Teruma District <strong>and</strong> the<br />

K<strong>in</strong> Bay Protection Society brought the case to the Naha District Court, claim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that the Ok<strong>in</strong>awa prefecture government’s authorization of the l<strong>and</strong> reclamation<br />

project was illegal.<br />

Ironically, the defendant <strong>in</strong> the case was the progressive Yara prefecture<br />

government whom the pla<strong>in</strong>tiff had politically supported. The progressive political<br />

parties <strong>and</strong> unions constituted Governor Yara’s support base, his platform stressed<br />

‘anti-militarism <strong>and</strong> peace <strong>in</strong> Ok<strong>in</strong>awa’. However, after the reversion, those who<br />

regarded the <strong>in</strong>troduction of pollut<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries as a new form of colonization of<br />

Ok<strong>in</strong>awa by ma<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong> Japan grew critical of the Yara adm<strong>in</strong>istration. The member<br />

organizations of the progressive parties <strong>and</strong> unions that supported the Yara government,<br />

such as the Prefecture Workers’ Union (Kenshokurō), Ok<strong>in</strong>awa Prefectural<br />

Labour Union Committee (Kenrōkyō), <strong>and</strong> the High School Teachers’ Union<br />

(Kōkyōso) all expressed their opposition to the CTS construction (Yara 1985: 270).<br />

Yara took this seriously <strong>and</strong> announced on 19 January 1974 his <strong>in</strong>tention not<br />

to authorize petroleum <strong>in</strong>dustries’ quotas for CTS construction (Yara 1985: 278),<br />

as well as request<strong>in</strong>g Mitsubishi to <strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>in</strong>dustries other than CTS on the<br />

reclaimed l<strong>and</strong>. In this ‘1.19 statement’, Yara emphasized the need for an<br />

accommodation of the popular feel<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st environmental destruction (Yara<br />

1985: 275).<br />

In May, Mitsubishi completed the l<strong>and</strong> reclamation, <strong>and</strong> requested the local<br />

government to authorize the CTS construction. The K<strong>in</strong> Bay Protection Group<br />

members, b<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g together <strong>in</strong> a group of 40–50, frequently dem<strong>and</strong>ed direct<br />

negotiation with Yara, pressur<strong>in</strong>g him to refuse Mitsubishi’s application immediately.<br />

A group of attorneys, who associated themselves with the ‘progressive’<br />

political camp <strong>and</strong> called themselves the Progressive Attorneys’ Organization<br />

(Kakush<strong>in</strong> Bengodan), submitted to Yara an op<strong>in</strong>ion statement that dem<strong>and</strong>ed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!